1/6

Shortly, Curve will start supporting a new @synthetix_io feature - ‘Virtual Synths.’ Presumably, this will open the door to infinite liquidity for large trades.

Along with this, Synthetix Exchange had record trading volumes a few days ago.

But is everything so good? Image
2/6

A week and a half ago, @lawmaster noticed that all these volumes belong to a few specific addresses.

For some reason, these addresses were using the new ‘Multi-Collateral Loans’ feature, although they were not receiving any visible profits.

3/6

Without these “wash” traders and the DeFi summer mania we experienced, volumes on Synthetix rarely exceed 1 million.

And to a great surprise, people rarely use DEX aggregators to trade “synth-synth,” despite the ads.

4/6

Until March 2020, the exchange was actively used by frontrunning bots for profit, but possibly one of the updates put an end to this.

From that moment on, Synthetix began to be used mainly through the front-end and by simple bots that did not need atomic transactions. Image
5/6

If we consider the trades that were not caused by interaction with the Synthetix proxy contract, we will clearly see an increase in popularity for @dHedgeOrg.

In part, this may be because this project has found the right market fit. Image
6/6

Perhaps after launching virtual synths, Synthetix itself will be able to find a market fit.

The main thing is that it will not consist in the fact that very smart bots profit from the loss of SNX stakers, whose number is increasing. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Igor Igamberdiev

Igor Igamberdiev Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FrankResearcher

10 Jan
The significant growth in new weekly Twitter followers affected not only crypto exchanges but also many others.

For example, the new weekly followers of coin accounts have reached levels of early December 2017. Image
Interest in cryptocurrency wallet providers and popular sites like Coinmarketcap is at the level of early February 2018. Image
The Twitter accounts of data providers and research companies did not have a long history back then.

At the moment, indicators of interest in them are breaking historical records. Image
Read 4 tweets
29 Dec 20
1/7 Let’s take a look at the addresses that exploited bugs in @CoverProtocol today.

Specifically, those addresses that able to receive more than 100 COVER using the exploit.👇 Image
2/7 Grap Finance (0x000075), who performed a white hat attack, creating 40 quintillion COVER.

Only 72.9k tokens were sold through 1inch, Sushiswap, and Uniswap for 4.3k ETH.

ETH was returned to the Cover team, and the remaining tokens were sent to the ‘ecrecover’ address. ImageImage
3/7 Cover Exploiter 1 (0x5d8d9f), in turn, was the first to be noticed for an exploit.

They could mint 11.7k COVER, which swapped with 1Inch for 83.46 WBTC, 866.3k DAI, and 1.5k ETH.

All funds received in the amount of $4.4M are located at the new address. Image
Read 7 tweets
26 Dec 20
1/6
Currently, 49% of addresses eligible to claim $1INCH tokens have done so.

They took 75% of what was originally available on a $1INCH distributor smart contract. This is primarily because many big claimers are liquidity providers, and they needed to create markets. Image
2/6
The chart shows the distribution of the first actions which were taken by the wallet owners with all their 1INCH tokens.

Only 19% are holding tokens or stake them in the @1inchExchange ecosystem.

Almost 25% of wallets sold all their tokens at once after a claim. Image
3/6
29% transferred all their tokens to another address. This is because these are mainly additional user wallets.

The “Others” includes wallets that performed actions with parts of the claimed tokens, such as sending tokens to several addresses or selling them in parts.
Read 6 tweets
23 Dec 20
1/6 Today we continue to plunge into the jungle of DeFi decentralized governance. Compound, which launched its governance this year, definitely deserves a mention due to its governance framework’s innovativeness and popularity. theblockcrypto.com/genesis/88681/…
2/6 Compound launched Autonomous Proposals (CAPs) for greater inclusiveness, allowing holders to delegate votes for a specific proposal, not a delegatee. Out of ten created CAPs, only three became formal proposals. In each case, this was due to support from whales. Image
3/6 I also noticed the rare use of the offline signatures feature (only 15 times since launch) due to the lack of infrastructure. But everything may change shortly, as today, a convenient interface for gasless voting and delegation was presented.
Read 6 tweets
16 Dec 20
1/5 Although there is enough big news today, I want to share my latest piece on MakerDAO governance. Below there will be literally a couple of thoughts from it.
theblockcrypto.com/genesis/87759/…
2/5 Despite its long history, MakerDAO governance continues to be relatively centralized and passive at all voting stages. For example, two-thirds of “Signal Request” topics on the MakerDAO forum were started by six people. Image
3/5 Voting in government polls with no need for MKR locking also leaves much to be desired. Image
Read 5 tweets
9 Dec 20
1/8
In my last research, I look at data storage on the Ethereum and Bitcoin blockchains. This could become a series of researches related to decentralized storage solutions. Check out this topic superficially here or deeper on @TheBlockRes. theblockcrypto.com/genesis/87043/…
2/8
Blockchain size growth leads to an increase in the cost of running a node. 256 GB HDD was enough for a node 3 years ago, but today it is better to use at least a 1TB SSD. For this reason, storing data directly on the blockchain is expensive. Image
3/8
The average block size in Bitcoin and Ethereum has increased by 2 and 100 times since 2015, respectively. Bitcoin blocks are 26 times larger than Ethereum blocks, but because of the shorter creation time, 25% more information is written every day due to blocks in Ethereum. Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!