For the first time ever, a credit rating agency in China is forced to pay ~$8 million for bond defaults of a construction firm.
Why?
A thread...
You see, Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) are independent entities that evaluate a borrower's creditworthiness. They tell you about a borrower’s state of affairs and offer you an objective assessment of their repayment ability.
And if a company is rated by a CRA, the chances of scoring a loan increase rather disproportionately. So, most corporates actively seek out CRAs to get a rating and pay them good money in the process. Of course, it’s not a bribe. It’s just professional fees.
However, the whole arrangement where corporates pay the rating agencies for getting their creditworthiness evaluated does look a bit suspect. What if there’s a conflict of interest? What if CRAs are too generous in rating a company?
And this is exactly what happened in China. Many companies defaulted on repayment obligations within weeks of receiving an AAA rating (meaning the likelihood of default was near negligible).
So, in a bid to make CRAs more accountable, China is forcing Dagong Global Credit Rating Co. to repay 10% of at least 494 million yuan of combined debt claims to more than 400 individual bondholders of Wuyang Construction Group Co.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A thread on how P&G cracked the Indian detergent market.
P&G's detergent brand Tide has been a market leader in the US for many decades. However, when P&G launched Tide in India in 2000 it failed abysmally. Tide could capture just 0.7% of the market after 3 years of its launch.
So the executives were compelled to conduct market research on the Indian detergent market. And they were taken aback by the results.
The research showed about 80% of consumers in India washed their clothes by hand. On the other hand, most people in the US use washing machines so it didn't really matter how the detergent affects your skin.
Amazon paid $0 in federal taxes even after making profits of $3billion and $10billion in 2017 and 2018 resp.
How did they do it?
For the uninitiated, companies in the US pay two types of taxes on their profits. First, a federal tax of 21%, which they pay to the Central Govt, and second a state tax that's paid to the local state govt.
Also, the US govt wanted companies to spend more on R&D so that the US can continue their tech dominance. So, they offered incentives and tax breaks. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, 2017 allowed companies to account for new capital/R&D investments as expenses incurred in the same year
For over 70 years after its inception, Coca-Cola was sold at 5 cents ($0.05). This price remained constant even after the beverage gained popularity.
Why?
Well, it all lies in a business decision made by the then President of the company- Asa Candler. Back in Candler's time, Coca-Cola was mostly sold through soda fountains. But in 1899, two lawyers had a bright idea- they wanted to sell Coke in pet/glass bottles.
So they approached Candler to buy the bottling rights. Candler thought the idea would never really take off, and agreed to sell the lawyers the syrup at a fixed price- forever. They, however, could sell bottled Coca-Cola at any price they deemed fit.
Since RCEP is trending right now, we thought we could whip up a quick explainer on the subject matter and maybe tell you why India decided to walk out of the agreement last year
The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is a free trade agreement between the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations and a few other partner countries. But it's mainly spearheaded by China
So with the RCEP, Indian manufacturers could have shipped certain goods and sold them elsewhere without having to worry about, say a 30% tariff. This way our prices could've remained competitive & domestic manufacturers would have actually had a shot at selling their goods abroad
Chinese tech giants lost ~$260 billion in market cap in just two days after news broke that the Chinese Govt is trying to clamp down on tech companies.
So, why is the Chinese govt doing this?
China’s authoritarian Govt is notorious for keeping an uncomfortably tight grip on the country’s economy. However, it has more or less given free reign to sprawling businesses like Alibaba and Tencent, that dominate China’s internet, e-commerce, and digital finance industries.
These companies have been free to explore new ventures, invest in multiple startups, amass huge swathes of customer data, and set whatever prices they like for their services. And as a result, they have become way too powerful.
The Association of Sugar Mills wants you to eat more sugar. But why?
“Avoid sugar!” It's the first advice most of us receive whenever we raise concerns about our health. But curiously, that’s not the mantra that ISMA (association of India’s sugar mills) wants us to follow.
So much so that it has launched a knowledge portal meetha.org to educate masses about the benefits of sugar consumption. This whole exercise is quite elaborate and mills have begun an online campaign in order to boost domestic demand, involving workshops and webinars
But why are they are doing it all of sudden? Well, we can largely attribute it to the fact that India has excess stockpiles of sugar.
See, the production of sugarcane attracts farmers because of the relatively high minimum support price (MSP) for the crop