Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote,
"AMERICANS LIKE TO LOOK TO THE BILL OF RIGHTS, THE 10 AMENDMENTS TO THE US CONSTITUTION AS THE GREATEST PROTECTION OF LIBERTY,....
1)
But it only works as that protection if it is read and understood, and to really understand it, one needs to look back at what its authors intended.
2)
A. The Bill of Rights states as a fact that these are rights that are the property of the people, individually. They are not rights granted by Government or allowed by the powerful.
3)
They are the natural rights of every human being that Government or some class of people cannot restrict or remove.
4)
B. The Bill of Rights, in effect, defines democracy because it protects dissent. Majority opinions do not need protection. Minority opinions need protection from the power of the majority.
5)
When a politician tells you that “everyone knows”, or “everyone thinks”, or “everyone agrees” that politician is trying to coerce you to believe something or think something, to conform to what he or she says the majority thinks.
6)
He or she is doing this to control you, to diminish your opinion in favor of conformity to those in power.
7)
But the Bill of Rights tells you that you can speak what you wish, publish what you wish, believe in and practice a religion that you choose, and associate with whomever you want.
8)
The Bill of Rights protects dissent, and that right to dissent is the basis of any real democracy.
9)
That does not mean there should be chaos. What it does mean is that open and free discussion, debate, reasoning with one another is the way to deal with issues — not coercion, not force, and not mind games to get conformity.
10)
C. And finally the Bill of Rights, in the 10th Amendment, tells us that the Federal Government needs to be limited and a function of the will of the people as expressed through their local states.
11)
Read the Bill of Rights. Understand that these are not limits on you. They are limits on the powerful."
12)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "OVER THE LAST 4 YEARS, HILLARY CLINTON, NANCY PELOSI, CHUCK SCHUMER, MAXINE WATERS, ADAM SCHIFF AND A WHOLE LIKES OF PEOPLE ON THE LEFT OF US POLITICS, REPEATEDLY ENCOURAGED PEOPLE TO GO INTO THE STREETS AND PROTEST AGAINST TRUMP
1)
In many cases, these people and others advocated violence against the President, Waters saying that he should be killed, Schiff claiming that he should be arrested and imprisoned, Biden threatening to beat him up,
2)
And all of these creatures applauded the Black Lives Matter demonstrations that deteriorated into looting, violence, shootings and burned out stores in major cities across the USA.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote:
שבת שלום
SHABBAT SHALOM
Shemot in a Nutshell
Exodus 1:1–6:1 1)
This parsha, by itself, is not very optimistic. It begins w/us being told how the Hebrew population grew rapidly, to the point that having an alien population in Egypt that did not share Egyptian culture & language, was seen as a potential threat to Egypt’s orderly society,
2)
which if you study Egyptian history, was not so much orderly as a history of coups d’etat, army rebellions & takeovers, & a couple invasions.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "SHABBAT SHALOM. שבת שלום
Parshat Vayechi
Genesis 47:28–50:26 1)
Jacob lives the final 17 years of his life in Egypt. Before his passing, he asks Josef to bury him in Eretz Yisrael.
2)
He blesses Joseph’s two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim, making them and their descendants equal in status to his own sons as inheritors in the Covenant of the nation of Israel.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "IRELAND AND ISRAEL. — WHAT MAKES NO SENSE.
1)
If one looks at the history of Ireland & the History of the Jewish People, one would automatically assume that the Republic of Ireland would be one of the greatest fans and supporters of the State of Israel.
2)
But, actually, Ireland has been more often hostile to Israel than sympathetic and supportive. On the surface, that does not seem to make sense.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "GIVEN CURRENT ISSUES WORLDWIDE, IT MAY BE THE TIME TO CONSIDER AN IDEA THAT WAS FLOATED BY SEVERAL PEOPLE IN THE UK, AUSTRALIA CANADA AND NEW ZEALAND SOME YEARS AGO.
CANZUK
1)
A GIVEN CURRENT ISSUES WORLDWIDE, IT MAY BE THE TIME TO CONSIDER AN IDEA THAT WAS FLOATED BY SEVERAL PEOPLE IN THE UK, AUSTRALIA CANADA AND NEW ZEALAND SOME YEARS AGO.
CANZUK
A free trade and travel zone uniting post-Brexit UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.
2)
Such a union, would be of countries that share close legal systems, traditions, and histories, and most importantly language, which would become the 3 most important union on the planet if it were done.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "San Francisco IS BUSY REMOVING NAMES FROM SCHOOLS AND PUBLIC PLACES
Jefferson and Washington. — removed because they were “Colonizers and oppressors”
1)
Diane Feinstein’s name removed — Because “she allowed a Confederate Flag in one instance years ago”
Any mention of the Transcontinental Railroad, expunged from school books because “the building of it destroyed opportunities for native Americans and imposed oppression”.
2)
But, things named for Bill Clinton can remain, though he authorized as Governor of Arkansas, the flying of the Confederate Flag at the state capitol.
3)