ON PRINCIPLES

The recent censorship events have shown that many don't understand what's a principle.

If you only practice it when convenient, it's not a principle.

1/11
This doesn't mean that a principle cannot be partisan.

For example, "I put the family first" can be a principle.

But then you must put your family first, both when it's convenient for you and when it isn't.

Otherwise it's not a principle.

2/11
What is the purpose of principles?

They keep us focused on the long term when the short term would misguide us

For example, I do not like Trump. And yet, yesterday I defended his free speech. Because I believe that defending free speech is ultimately good for everyone.

3/11
Principles protect us from undesired or unthinkable consequences.
They protect us from the problems we didn't experience and from what could go wrong.

They are there for when we think they could be transgressed. They are there for when we think it makes sense to skip them.

4/11
Rights are a form of principles.

Rights are preserved by granting them to our enemies.

The moment we cease to grant them when inconvenient for us, we cease to have them too.

The moment we destroy their sanctity, we open the door to someone else taking them from us.

5/11
Theoretically, you can draw a line to when a right is suspended. For example, you could decide that speech can be censored when inviting to violence

However, in practice, lines can be moved. Say, someone could define an opinion creating emotional discomfort as violence.

6/11
Some organizations have principles. They're called Core Values.

Anyone who worked in a company knows that Core Values become meaningless as soon as lines are drawn, explicitly or implicitly.

Eg, we request respect for people, unless you're a star performer.

It won't work

7/11
In the short term, it might seem efficient to violate principles when convenient. In the long term it never is.

This is because violating principles has second-order effects, and in the long term, they catch up with you.

8/11
Violating principles is like the Russian Roulette.

Five out of six times, you'll be better off.

And some idiot-yet-intellectual might even justify that the average outcome is positive. And he might be right.

But if you keep doing it, the bullet eventually hits you.

9/11
(A justification for the previous tweet here: )

10/11
Conclusions:

– Principles are there to guide you towards what's good for your long term.

– If you only practice it when convenient, it's not a principle.

– Rights are preserved by granting them to our enemies.

11/11

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Luca Dellanna

Luca Dellanna Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DellAnnaLuca

8 Jan
Imagine it’s 2024, Trump runs for presidency again, and he wins.

The Democrats, surprised by the results in a few counties, ask for a forensic audit of the voting machines but some get denied, “there’s no evidence”.

1/N
2/ You, a Democrat, don’t like the answer, because the other party spent the last 4 years talking about interference during the elections.
3/ You get told to respect the democratic process.

But you do already want to respect it! Perhaps, you even believe that your candidate did lose, but now you get suspicions because the Republicans are dismissing the claims of foul play rather than investigating them.
Read 13 tweets
8 Jan
THOUGHTS ON CENSORSHIP

1/ Censorship you don’t like always begins as censorship you like.

2/ Allowing censorship assumes that this power can be taken back and that it won't corrupt the censor. Two strong assumptions.
3/ Censorship assumes that your party will stay in charge forever and won't turn against you. Strong assumptions.

Rule of thumb: don't allow censorship if you're not willing to have your enemies as the censors.

4/ The moment you withhold your enemies a right, you open the door from it being withhold from you.

Rights are preserved by giving them to your enemies.
Read 20 tweets
6 Jan
This report, published 2 months before the COVID-19 outbreak, got it so wrong that it's worth asking ourselves what could avoid similar failures.

More competent people, yes, but there's more. Thread.

For the curious, the full report is here: ghsindex.org/wp-content/upl…

In the next tweets a few highlights.
The report got so many things wrong. For example, it gave maximum preparedness scores to the US, a country that didn't act like it was very prepared.

Does the fact that the report was largely US funded matter? Did it "force" a high score?

Read 16 tweets
6 Jan
SEMANTIC WARS

In the physical past, power was monopoly on violence.

In the digital future, it is about controlling who processes information and how.

(Thread, 1/N)
2/ First, a note. The distinction is not so black and white. For example, the use of force can still be relevant in the digital world (e.g., coercion).

As another example, in many dystopias, power is monopoly on information enforced through physical means.
3/ But the point is, the logic of violence determines the structure of society. And what is valuable and how it can be seized is a key input.

(examples over the next tweets)

Read 15 tweets
5 Jan
Also, the idea that North Korea is ranked third-last should have been a tell.

Isolation and authoritarianism seem an advantage here.
So, let's see who are the IYI who worked on the pile of BS that is this report.

"The GHS Index is a project of the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (JHU) and was developed with The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU)"
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!