On Wednesday mid-afternoon, I found myself simultaneously alarmed and mildly amused by the events on the Capitol. The first photos that came out were of quixotic, not particularly threatening folks like the QAnon Shaman.
It certainly was a bad sign for the state of our politics, but it fit with the "what if Watergate but stupid" view of the Trump regime. It didn't seem particularly sinister, in other words.
But then more photos started coming out, photos that were not amusing in any way. I felt the turn viscerally as my stomach dropped. Maybe for you it was the barricaded Senate chambers. For me it was this photo:
That is a man who came for trouble. He's not a silly "riot tourist" stealing a lectern w/ a shit-eating grin. He's a bad dude there to do bad things.
He's armed & armored carrying zip ties. There aren't many non-sinister reasons to be carrying zip ties around the capitol.
Just to be clear for those who don't know, zip ties are used to secure peoples' hands and feet. When you take them into action, you have them partially pre-zipped so that you can quickly slip them on someone. It's a classic tool of the hostage-taker.
Bear in mind, it was only a few months ago that alt-right terrorists planned the occupation of the Michigan state capitol building, taking hostage lawmakers, and executing Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Something similar might've been planned for DC on Wednesday.
If so, thankfully they failed because lawmakers were successfully evacuated. But realize just how serious this might have been. Using a protest march--whipped to a frenzy by an oafish narcissist--would've been the perfect set up.
Again, this is not dispositive, but it's also quite possible and something that's bothering security experts.
The last time far right-wing violence was this concerning was the 90s with the attacks on abortion clinics and the OKC bombing.
If QAnon continues to metastasize and takes a violent turn now that a Democrat takes office, we could be looking at a similar wave of terrorism.
This would track, of course, with the wave in the 90s. Once Bush Sr. left office and Democrat Bill Clinton took over, the far right movement went into overdrive. Militias started popping up all over, white supremacists had a recruiting field day.
All of that to say, don't be surprised if in the next several years (or even the next twelve days) a QAnon true believer, angry about the death of QAnon advocate [note the shirt] and "martyr" Ashli Babbit, commits an act of terrorism in her name.
She could play the same role that Vicki Weaver did in the 90s, when federal agents shot her at the Ruby Ridge standoff. It was a key event in the radicalization of Timothy McVeigh, the OKC bomber.
All of that to say, this might not be over. The worse could be yet to come. Adjust your expectations accordingly and then think about how that should calibrate your reaction to the political questions of the moment.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a great question from @HeerJeet and it has very old roots. In my book, I discuss a similar period of anxiety in the 1960s about the possibility of Air Force officers being involved in a coup. Thread.
Given the size of the US military in WW2, afterwards there was a spike in concern that some of these demilitarized veterans would be amenable to radicalization and supportive of insurrection. These fears heightened after the coups in France/Algiers in 1958 and 1961.
This was the peak era of the Cold War, so anti-communist anxiety was layered over top. The Right feared that communist infiltrators in the government would subvert the Republic. The Left feared that anti-communist military officers would launch a preemptive, paranoid coup.
I'm going to walk you through several common responses from Republicans to the insurrection yesterday and show why they are incorrect.
- "It wasn't Trump supporters. It was Antifa."
Claims of false flag operations are always tempting because it redirects blame. We all prefer it when *our* side is straightforwardly good and the *other* side does all the bad stuff. It's very natural to want this to be true.
The problem is that it is only rarely correct. Usually, when someone wears MAGA clothing, shouts about their support for Trump, and does so in the company of thousands of other people doing so, they are what they appear.
Trump knows he's going to have to leave office in two weeks. He knew that Pence didn't have the power to reject state electors. So why then would he spread misinformation, undermine our democracy, and incite today's violence?
Because it works whether or not it changes the result. It's a pattern he's followed Trump throughout his term.
He identifies a wedge issue, fans the smoldering embers of that controversy into open flame, and then enjoys the adulation, attention, and donations from the slice of America who falls for the trick. The only way he knows how to lead is via division.
10 former defense secretaries felt the need to assert the military's neutrality in partisan politics. That's disconcerting, sure, but when the coup comes someday, it's not the military you need to worry about the most. Thread.
Remember, there are 132,000 armed federal agents, most of whom are based around Washington, DC. That's over a quarter of the size of the actual, active-duty US Army, and many of them are military veterans with access to military-grade firepower.
After all, when Trump needed a paramilitary force to do what the military was reluctant to do--clear peaceful protestors out of Lafayette Park for a photo op--he turned to a mix of forces from the Bureau of Prisons, Park Police, Secret Service, and so on.
- added weeks (at minimum) and months (at maximum) to the approval process for the vaccines, most notably by taking from November 20 to December 11 to complete a review at a time when ~2,000 people were dying per day.
How to Pull Off a Coup; or, at least, How to Do it Better than Donald Trump.
Trump’s half-assed attempts at using bogus claims of election fraud in order to *himself* commit election fraud are doomed. But... 1/
...it’s worth considering how easy it would have been for a somewhat more competent wannabe authoritarian to steal the 2020 election. But consider this not just a “what might have been” scenario but also a “what could be” situation at some point in the future. 2/
Here’s how you’d do it:
First, follow Trump’s own pre-election strategy of spreading doubt about the upcoming outcome. It’s important to convince enough of your supporters that any election outcome other than your own victory is ipso facto evidence of a stolen election. 3/