4) The intentional distractions from China through a laughable focus on false claims of Russian-Collusion did irreparable harm to our country.
To date there has been one conviction for an institutional attempt to impair - even bring down - President Trump's administration.
5) Justice delayed is justice foregone.
Why is it that Justice seems to so lean heavily in one direction?
And why do people pervasively believe the Institutions protect their own?
6) Many that worked to impair or end the Trump Admin are now the loudest voices - calling for further restrictions on liberties. Asking for punishment and submission.
The inaction of the GOP enabled this. You all enabled this.
7) We now see the GOP cower to the Left as retributions threaten and events of the past years are lopsidedly mischaracterized.
People become tired from a lack of basic fairness. We on the right understand it has long been so. But that doesn't change the mounting frustration.
8) Inaction from the DOJ, the actions from Congress, the GOP's abandonment of its base all speak to this distrust.
You did this. Not us.
I believe in the Constitution. But I have no faith in the Institutions of DC.
9) Politicians can cloak themselves in the Constitution all they want.
But it is their own self-serving actions - and inactions - that have brought us to this place.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) Congress is incentivized to see Pence's role as passive.
But Constitutional scholars differ and/or acknowledge that varying interpretations exist.
Note: I am NOT predicting what Pence will do. I will just be highlighting some ambiguities.
(Apologies - will be long thread)
2) Edward Foley is head of Election Law Dept at Ohio U.
He is Left & originator of Blue Shift theory
What follows are quotes from his "war-game" paper published in the Loyola University Chicago Law Journal - Preparing for a Disputed Presidential Election lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewconten…
3) "As part of an effort to prepare for the risk of a disputed presidential election in 2020, it is imperative to consider how the embarrassingly deficient procedures might operate if they were actually called into play."
“I think several senators from Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Arizona also wrote letters sent to the Vice President, [telling him] we want the vice president to at least delay it 10 to 12 days.”
Jan 20th is date that matters Constitutionally:
"Terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January"
Pence can, and in my view, should defer.
Allows Audit to proceed. Takes ECA away.
Gives states time to revisit, clarify. With new evidence.
3) …In the morning, new numbers show Trump’s lead starting to slip, and by noon, it is below 20,000. Impatient, Trump holds an impromptu press conference and announces:"
4) "So begins the saga over the disputed result of the 2020 presidential election.”
Although familiar, the passage isn’t taken from a recent article describing the Nov. 3, 2020, presidential election. Rather, it comes from a 55-page paper, published on Aug 31, 2019 by Ed Foley.
5) Foley’s paper, more of a Democrat war-game analysis, takes readers on a complicated electoral journey that may well prove to accurately foreshadow events through Jan. 20.
Foley has provided a complicated—but thus far surprisingly accurate—electoral roadmap to be used by Dems.
This issue was repeatedly highlighted bu Judge Totenberg:
Dominion’s system “does not produce a voter-verifiable paper ballot or a paper ballot marked with the voter’s choices in a format readable by the voter because the votes are tabulated solely from the unreadable QR code.”
Judge also found that Dominion's QR codes are NOT encrypted:
“Evidence plainly contradicts any contention that the QR codes or digital signatures are encrypted,”
This was “ultimately conceded by Mr. Cobb and expressly acknowledged later by Dr. Coomer during his testimony.”
Judge Totenberg said there was “demonstrable evidence” that the implementation of Dominion’s systems by Georgia placed voters at an “imminent risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote,” which she defined as a “vote that is accurately counted.”
“The idea that the Vice President has sole authority to determine whether or not to count electoral votes submitted by a state, or which of competing submissions to count, is inconsistent with a proper understanding of the Constitution.”
Foley, a lawyer/professor/WAPO contributor, is known for his Blue Shift theory
"election day results can initially indicate a Republican is ahead, but adding provisional ballots and absentee ballots into the count can eventually show a Democratic victory" papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…