One more thread for the day. I want to talk about X. But it’s hard to talk about X these days. X is incredibly controversial, and when it is brought up, tempers quickly flare. People have very strong feelings about X. People who are concerned about X fall into a number of camps.
There are those who believe outlandish things about X despite evidence to the contrary. These people often react very strongly to attempts to point out that their beliefs about X don’t necessarily accord with reality. Even raising questions about their beliefs provokes a reaction
Other people have reasonable and legitimate questions about X. They are deeply concerned about X, and the way that X affects them or others in our society. And of course many people concerned about X fall along a spectrum between radical and reactive, and reasonable and measured.
However, all of them are very frustrated with our society on account of X. They see X as evidence of a widespread problem in our society. At times they take to the streets to express frustration over X. They march & rally & demand that elected officials take action to address X.
Some of our leaders have spoken very strongly on the subject of X. They have joined these marches and spoken at these rallies and encouraged the people to make sure that something is done about X.
Like the people, some leaders are reasonable & want to get to the bottom of X. But others are opportunistic & are willing to indulge the most extreme elements of those who care about X.
They stoke outrage over X and engage in various kinds of political theatre in order to take advantage of outrage over X.
At various times, marches and rallies about X have turned violent. Encouraged by both elected and unelected leaders, these marches have become mobs, filled with violence, looting, and rioting.
Rioters have assaulted government buildings, occupied government buildings, and caused property damage. Even worse, in the midst of these riots over X, both law enforcement officers and protesters have been killed.
Of course, not all of those involved in these marches have rioted. Many are simply protesting in order to express their concern about X. But it’s very easy for the radical rioters and the reasonable protesters to be lumped together in the popular imagination.
A few questions about X:
1) How important is it to discuss X with clarity, distinguishing between various perspectives on X and various ways of seeking to rectify the challenges posed by X?
1) How important is it to discuss X with clarity, distinguishing between various perspectives on X and various ways of seeking to rectify the challenges posed by X?
2) How important is it to avoid lumping everyone who cares about X into the same boat and seeking to scapegoat particular groups over X?
3) How important is it for there to be universal condemnation of those who engage in riots and violence over X?
4) How important is it for there to be universal condemnation of those leaders who indulge and encourage the rioters and the violent?
4) How important is it for there to be universal condemnation of those leaders who indulge and encourage the rioters and the violent?
5) Assuming you answered "very important" to the four previous questions, how are we doing as a society in clarifying, distinguishing, and condemning?
6) Most importantly, how are *you* doing as an individual in clarifying, distinguishing, and condemning?
6) Most importantly, how are *you* doing as an individual in clarifying, distinguishing, and condemning?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
