1/Nice viewpoint out today: "Balancing the Risks and Benefits of Benzodiazepines" -authors note risks of these drugs and their utility, in light of @US_FDA changing the label to highlight risks jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
2/FDA's revised warning will more thoroughly cover risks, and the authors endorse that "increased caution regarding benzodiazepine use is warranted; fewer benzodiazepine prescriptions are needed" ... with a careful stipulation...
3/Benzodiazepine risks needed to be highlighted, "However, when considered without an appropriate patient-centered context, this enhanced warning statement might lead to fewer appropriate prescriptions and unintended consequences" - this should echo what happened with opioids
4/In 2015-16, 30 million Americans reported "use" of a benzodiazepine and 17% of that 30m "misuse". Rate of benzodiazepine-related deaths increased by a factor of 10 from 1999 to 2017. 17% of addiction treatment admissions identify this drug type as one of the drugs of abuse
5/And yet benzodiazepines are effective for the treatment of anxiety disorders. Across 58 RCTs they were more effective than placebo, consistently: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30676225/
6/The authors note, correctly, that a beefed up FDA warning (which was justifiable!) "physicians might inappropriately withhold benzodiazepine therapy, thereby leading to poorly treated anxiety disorders and insomnia, as well as precipitation of withdrawal"
7/Antidepressant meds &psychotherapy will prove (and have proven) effective for many patients with anxiety disorders. And "a significant number of patients will derive inadequate symptom relief from these modalities or may have limited access to psychotherapeutic treatments"
8/"patients should be screened for risk factors before initiating benzodiazepines, including substance use disorders, a history of misuse of Rx'd medications, cognitive impairment, older age & risk of falls, and concomitant use of opioids."
9/A wise conclusion: "The newly enhanced boxed warning appropriately highlights the real risks posed by benzodiazepines; it is up to physicians to judiciously act on but not overreact to this information." jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Why did so many physicians become Nazis?” – this new essay bears on us, the non-Nazi doctors. In short, “science” can be invoked by immoral agents, & science language can seduce us into societal plans that override our duties to individuals @tabletmag /1 tabletmag.com/sections/histo…
Germany was extreme, of course.
Over 50% of doctors joined the Nazi party. There, Jews, gays & disabled persons were designated a disease on the German “body”. Ridding Germany of them was seen as good science.
We need not project the US will follow that, ever /2
But the US & other nations have not been alien to an immoral use of science-based authority.
Germany’s Laws for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring were based on American laws, passed earlier. We should all know about Tuskegee
/3 cdc.gov/tuskegee/timel…
2/Opioid prescribing has ⬇️37% since its peak in 2011. Today, many agencies agree that “deprescribing” was not carried out in ways that consistently protected patients.
We ask “how can well-intended changes to care transpire in ways that are unsafe or harmful?”
3/De-implementation= “reducing or stopping practices that are ineffective, unproven, harmful, overused, or inappropriate”
With opioids, that could be not starting, stopping or reducing.For us, this does *not* reflect a commitment to opioid elimination from care.h/t @VPrasadMDMPH
We are eager to hear the plenary speaker for @US_ASP (the new academic pain org for the US) Dr. Meghani of U.Penn Nursing.. on the "Guideline Epidemic and Pain Care" introduced by @JessicaMerlinMD@DrJohnPereira /1
Key points for Dr. Meghani:
*US fighting its drug war "like other resource poor countries"
*Broad misapplication of the 2016 @CDCgov
opioid guideline
*Seriously undermined care of patients with mod to severe pain
*Obligations of policy makers in scaling high policies /2
Key points made by Dr. Meghani, of U Penn Nursing for @US_ASP
Insurers and states acted rapidly, in 2016-17 after @CDCgov
, to impose hard #opioid dose limits, to require opioid stoppage and taper, all in apparent violation of the Guideline, which had a low evidence GRADE /3
1/Bravo to Dr. @BethDarnall for stating (and better, helping lead a trial) ethical principles of a taper in which the patient is the agent, it's voluntary, and dose might go UP too. Thank-you @OldHeadFighta for the image in the next Tweet that captures the ethics here
3/The obligation upon clinicians is to treat the people in our care as full-fledged. Don't treat patients as means to an end, we wrote. Mandated dose reductions of opioids are "Not Justifiable Clinically or Ethically": pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32631183/
Plenary: "The Evolving Relationship of Opioid Prescribing with Opioid Overdose and Suicide" - this topic will be presented of the new @US_ASP now by @AmyBohnert of University of Michigan - I'll share some points as they arise /1
Dr. Bohnert indicates she will focus more on overdose than on suicide because the combination of topics might exceed the time (and it would help to have suicide experts) /2
Opioid Rx and benzo Rx have been declining - for awhile, and for high-dose prescribing, etc. all of it is heading down @BrianMannADK of NPR please take note /3