Since 2017 it's become default move for Dem-run states to pass laws enabling at least anyone who is not incarcerated to vote.
Nevada, Colorado, New Jersey, and California did this in 2019/2020, joining 15 states who already had these rules.
Virginia falls way short of that.
And not just Dem states! Ohio, Indiana, Utah, and other red states allow anyone who is not presently incarcerated to vote.
(Louisiana in fact just enabled some people on probation & parole to vote in a 2018 law.)
Will the bill pushed by Virginia Dems really fall short of that?
For purposes of this thread, I did not get into question of enabling people who are still incarcerated to vote. (Which some VA groups are pushing for.)
But in 2021, it's out of even the Dem Party-mainstream (plus of states like UT or IN) to disenfranchise people not in prison.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There's important organizing around the important idea of eliminating disenfranchisement altogether.
But the fact that Dems are coalescing so clearly around the idea that anyone not incarcerated should vote is itself recent, & a huge deal. 4 states got that done in 2019/2020.
(That's why I said it was so disappointing earlier this week for the VA governor to propose felony disenfranchisement reform that would not at least enfranchise everyone not in prison: It leaves many behind, *and* in a way that's far from the mainstream politics of the moment.)
It doesn’t work to say “even the president of the United States” to convey dangers that people’s account could be deleted, when whole problem is that the most powerful person in nation— “even the president of the United States”—is agitating for a violent overthrow of democracy.
Corporate monopolies over communication & media are absolutely a problem we should confront. But Trump having power & directing it against democracy is not what vindicates that diagnosis: it’s an urgent danger to be taken as a premise if you care about the other problem as well.
Especially when he has built that power in great part thanks to the world created by those corporate monopolies — from his ability to lie with no context, to the decimation of local media & investigative newsrooms, to the mutual dependence of ratings/views between him and them.
A BFD deal today: Charleston County, in SC, was long run by a very pro-ICE GOP sheriff, but he was ousted in 2020 by a Dem who pledged to cut ICE contracts.
She's keeping that promise today, her first day in office, by terminating the county's contract with ICE's 287(g) program.
The same thing happened Friday in Gwinnett County, GA, a notoriously pro-ICE county: The new sheriff ran on terminating 287(g), & he did so immediately upon taking office.
In October, I did a list of the 12 most important elections for immigration & ICE cooperation. These two, of course, were on it. theappeal.org/politicalrepor…
You know of this new DA, Deborah Gonzalez, if you’ve been following me: she won a runoff in a race that almost didn’t happen after Brian Kemp tried to cancel it.
I reported last month Gonlazez was among a wave of new DAs who ran on never seeking the death penalty. (Hence why I focused on that in first tweet: memo says a lot else.) theappeal.org/politicalrepor…
George Gascon in LA has also confirmed this policy since taking office in December.