@cjsnowdon @mitrebarnet Then why do you reply with something about deaths, not hospitalisations?

1. Data on hospital ‘admissions’ of patients with C19 includes anyone who has had a positive PCR test up to 14 days before admission, on admission or after admission: (coronavirus.data.gov.uk/about-data#eng…)/
@cjsnowdon @mitrebarnet 2. Any person testing positive within different seven day periods would be counted within each of those? See, from the NHS publication:
For example, if a person was tested on Thursday and Friday of the same week, they would only be counted once in the reporting week.
@cjsnowdon @mitrebarnet However, if someone was tested on Tuesday and Friday of the same week, that individual would be counted in 2 reporting periods, as the 2 tests fall into different 7-day reporting periods.
(gov.uk/government/pub…)
@cjsnowdon @mitrebarnet Thus, those who are included on the data as having been ‘admitted’ to hospital with Covid-19 include:
(a)Those who tested positive up to 14 days before admission but have not had had the virus for weeks or months (‘false positives’);
@cjsnowdon @mitrebarnet (b)Those who tested positive up to 14 days before admission but are asymptomatic;
(c)Those who tested positive up to 14 days before admission who, while unwell, were admitted to hospital for another reason;
@cjsnowdon @mitrebarnet (d)Those who caught the virus in hospital, not in the community, whether or not they are ill with and being treated for C19; and
(e)Anyone who has previously counted as an ‘admission’ who tests positive in a subsequent weekly testing period.
@cjsnowdon @mitrebarnet Which is why the only objective way of measuring the severity of this winter is by comparing total occupancy of hospitals and ICUs with other winters in the last twenty years. When one does that, it is not outside the envelope.
@cjsnowdon @mitrebarnet And it is far less severe than the winter of 1999-2000.
@cjsnowdon @mitrebarnet But even if it was outside the 'envelope' of the last 20 years, that would not remotely justify the extraordinary and unprecedented (before 2020) Chinese totalitarian measures being imposed now; measures that any right thinking person would before have dismissed as unthinkable.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Francis Hoar

Francis Hoar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Francis_Hoar

10 Jan
The People’s Republic of China is the most dangerous evil in our world today. Particularly due to its pernicious influence throughout the world and in international institutions.
No, the most *dangerous* evil for the world. There are worse regimes - Isis, etc - but they are not as dangerous. China’s tentacles, on the other hand, are everywhere.

https://t.co/t7DWAoicuo
Read 5 tweets
10 Jan
Surprise, surprise. The Year Zero idea that we can end a pandemic through vaccination - which has never happened before - has feet of sand. Every other respiratory pandemic has ended through exposure, natural immunity and evolution to less fatal strains.
blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04…
I say Year Zero because the singular feature of the reaction to this pandemic has been the refutation of all prev experience of how pandemics develop & how they are addressed; & all previous pandemic planning, right up to October 2019, as I set out below:
That is not to say that vaccines might not have a part to play. They might. But the fact that vaccines take years to develop is not merely due to the need to test them adequately for adverse reactions. It is because of the need to test their effectiveness.
Read 8 tweets
8 Jan
Powerful? You mean a powerful symbol of how far we have gone from having an independent judiciary? A judge expanding his own propaganda when punishing a man for exercising his fundamental democratic rights.
It isn't either, in my view. The decision is the sentence. That isn't what the complaint about. Nor is this a matter of case management....
Read 4 tweets
7 Jan
‘Anyone who stands outside hospitals saying theyre empty really need to grow up.’
The Buffoon.

The question is whether they are any busier than average for the time of year.
Stop lying.
This is an excellent resource:
https://t.co/69IIBYEp5m
See the ‘once in a century pandemic’ ‘crisis’ marked in yellow. Image
Read 4 tweets
19 Dec 20
Tyrannical governments drunk on power and governing through lies are not legitimate. Are never legitimate.

The social contract is broken asunder.
Lies. We are governed on the basis of a tissue of lives.
Those responsible will pay for this.
And this is what they are doing to good people across the country.

Shame on them.

Shame on all who have enabled them.

Read 7 tweets
17 Dec 20
I see that Hancock is still promoting the lie of asymptomatic transmission. Without that lie, the whole house of cards - anti-social distancing, masks, closing hospitality and restricting day to day life - would collapse. aier.org/article/asympt…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!