Tarlochan Singh, an elderly farmer, summed up the mood, saying:
“It is not merely about a few legal infirmities in the laws. It is the philosophy of governance that will trigger a national crisis, a situation that will widen the conflict between the rich and the poor...
If this direction is not changed, we may be heading for civil war in this country. We have to understand the nature of the threat first; it is not about legalese, it is about life.”
“Everybody is going to be affected — the small businessmen, the agriculture workers, the consumers. We don’t need governments, courts and committees to tell us what our pain is.
Why is the government doing such a favour that will endanger our lives?
None will move from here until the laws are repealed.
The government can fire on us, unleash tanks or do bombarding from fighter planes. We die or defeat this government.”
Asked what would happen if the leaders strike a deal with the government and decide to give up, he said:
“It is not possible now. You must have a very low-grade moral fabric to strike a deal with the government on this issue. Our leaders aren’t like that.”
The movement had crossed the phase when compromises were possible.
It is a unique mass movement which has acquired a life of its own. It is controlled by the collective spirit now.
“We know the worth of the government’s assurances. The Prime Minister says the corporate entities will pay higher rates than the MSP. We are fighting for the lowest benchmark — give us legal guarantee of MSP. Good for the corporates also.
What is the problem in creating safeguards for the farmers? Don’t give us subsidies, no cash… just ensure MSP. Doesn’t the Prime Minister know how much is the dues of sugarcane farmers despite repeated assurances?”
Jathedar Baba Mohan Singh, who was overhearing the conversation, gave his final verdict:
“The Prime Minister and the Supreme Court judges should come here and see the truth. This is a people’s movement. Farmers ensure nobody goes hungry in India...
That’s why every Indian, cutting across region and religion, is supporting us.
We are here till this bekaar sarkar withdraws these bekaar laws.
Our langar has continued for 550 years and we are determined to serve the farmers here for as long as they continue the struggle.”
Farmers' protest: why courts don’t matter any more
At Singhu and Ghazipur borders, it is about life, not legalese
While the Prime Minister tweeted his outrage at the insurrection at Capitol Hill, he has been silent on the Badaun rape of a 50-year-old woman in a temple.
How many farmers have died on the outskirts of Delhi, in the freezing cold, as they protest peacefully against the Modi government’s farm acts? At last count, 60.
The dear PM has felt no remorse or pain or shame. He carries on with his publicity routines while pretending to work
Not one tweet from our prolific tweeting PM.
The 56-inch strongman who does not have the courage to face India’s farmers.
He is helped immeasurably by a pusillanimous media, the bulk of which has been unable to cover the farmers’ protests with any semblance of professionalism.
Psychological scientists Martin Reinmann and Philip Zimbardo came with an idea as to why we are capable of horrible acts.
In their 2011 paper," The Dark Side of Social Encounters", the authors states that two process are more important deindividualisation and dehumanisation.
Deindividualisation happens when we perceive as anonymous.
Dehumanisation happens when we stop seeing others as human beings. The authors explain dehumanisation as a "cortical cataract", a blurring of our perception. we stop being able to really see people
a dramatic example of dehumanising was seen in Hitler's genocidal propaganda, where he described Jewish people as "untermenschen" - subhumans.
The Nazis also compared other groups they targeted to animals, insects and diseases.
The BJP’s and RSS’s antisocial, antihuman policies need to strongly be condemned not because they are “bad for growth and GDP,” but because they are simply immoral and inhumane. theindiaforum.in/article/why-i-…
I also want to warn people who read such analyses that there is something called the “tyranny” of economists, who notoriously have “reduced a question that dogged political philosophers for centuries—about how much harm is acceptable in a society—to a math problem.”
It is frightening that the thrust of the Indian state and India’s elite today is to flatten all of our awe-inspiring diversity into misguided “one nation one system” absurdities.
Present excise duty on petrol is Rs.32.98, which, when UPA-2 left office was just Rs.9.48 per litre. In other words, excise duty on petrol is 348% higher now than in 2014.
Also, the present excise duty on diesel is Rs. 31.83 which has increased by 894% more than Rs.3.56 in 2014
Flood is always a rate problem. There are attempts to say that it is all about total quantities, yep, depressing to see such narratives from academia of Premier institutions without grappling practical side.
The chasm between research & real world in India are oceans apart
Then we should understand that we cannot create systems for once in bluemoon events.
Also no reservoir systems has endless capabilities, like all other things in the universe.
All systems we design & maintain with an acceptable risk criteria, this is a call of the society
Many of the expert engineers and doctors are bad communicators, they only know to converse with their peers. They struggle to explain the nuances.
Our decision makers are impatient to listen to the details and nuances because sometimes the details make their head spinning