Had a chance to provide some info to @NatashaBertrand regarding the challenges associated with countering IEDs. That exchange caused me to ponder the question: “Could we be approaching the early stages of an insurgency in the US?” 1
Now, my friend and former DHS official @juliettekayyem has suggested the term “stochastic terrorists” to describe the actions of those who attacked the capital last week. Her model, in part, describes random timing & targeting to excite a generalized fear in society. 2
That could be past of an insurgency. But given expansive online collaboration & planning, this may be the beginning of something much more nefarious & more difficult to address. We ought to be wary of what we may be facing. Let me explain... 3
In 2003, I was in the Pentagon on the Joint Staff. The Chairman asked me to define what we were experiencing in Iraq. Was it guerrilla war, a counter-terrorism fight, an insurgency? After researching, I suggested we were facing a “complex insurgency.” 4
We had transitioned from a conventional attack to a new fight, and that “complex insurgency” should have caused our military and State Dept to do certain things. We didn’t adapt as fast as we should have in Iraq in 2003, and that negatively shaped the fight for years. 5
It’s always good to know the kind of fight you’re in. “Insurgency” is defined in our military doctrinal manuals, and that definition suggests certain actions. 6
Here’s the definition: “An insurgency is an organized uprising that uses violent & nonviolent means to overthrow an existing government, or to wrest away aspects of govt control, either de jure or de facto, over parts of its territory.... 7
The description continues: “Insurgents often count on government security forces (i.e., police, military, etc) to over-react, which may have the effect of driving more recruits who may question the legitimacy of the government into their ranks.” 8
Usually insurgencies flourish when the government is authoritative, does not support the desires of the majority of the people, or has not adequately addressed grievances of the population. 9
For example, in Iraq the Sunni and Kurdish population saw the Shia-led government as being authoritative and incompetent, the problems within provinces outside of Baghdad were not addressed by the central govt, and the population was aggrieved. 10
In the US today, lies and disinformation - fomented by those in government & foreign malign actors, echoed by media, and reinforced by government inaction to resolve crises - has stoked the desire to revolt against the government. 11
Additionally, loss of faith in govt intelligence, increased desire for greater individual freedoms with reduction to a social/societal contract, expansion of unregulated militias, and a modeling of military behavior by a non-mil segment of the population is troubling 12
This is NOT a prediction we will be fighting a large-scale insurgency in the US. But we ought be concerned about to counter continuing dysfunction from our elected officials, government processes, media activity, & how we live up to our personal responsibilities 13
What we are experiencing now - and what we may continue to see post-Biden inauguration - will require holistic changes...primarily a return to our nation’s values so we might ensure the continued health of our democratic republic. 14/End.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Hertling

Mark Hertling Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkHertling

11 Nov 20
Best to all on this 2020 Veterans’ Day!

Some have suggested vets post pictures in uniform. But...I’m going to post a few w those met among the way.

Here’s CSM Roger Blackwell, sharing thanksgiving dessert on top of Mt Sinjar. One of the best soldiers I’ve ever met. 1/
Here’s LTC (Dr) Kamal Kalsi, who was brave and courageous in combat and in making changes in the Army. dear friend & patriot. 2/
Here are 3 WWII veterans who parachuted into Normandy, at a reunion at St Mere Eglise, 68 years after they fought for freedom on the European continent. One of them now sadly gone to higher ground. 3/
Read 12 tweets
6 Oct 20
Gettysburg is one of my favorite places, I’ve been there hundreds of times.

It’s extremely wise for @joebiden to go there to speak about national unity and our values.

Lincoln’s was not the primary speaker in Nov 1863, months after the battle, but his words resonate today.1/
Edwin Everett, a famous orator of that period, was the main speaker. He attracted a large crowd & he gave a grand speech for over 2 hours.

President Lincoln, as an afterthought, was asked to provide “a few remarks.” He spoke 272 words & it took just under 2 minutes. 2/
What was unique in Lincoln’s speech was the use of key words: we, us, dedication to unfinished work, a reference to our nations documents, what should unite rather than divide us. 3/
Read 7 tweets
11 Sep 20
In the middle of a friendly conversation with a new civilian friend this morning, he asked: "Do you remember where you were on 9/11."

My wife and I glanced at each other with knowing looks.

"It's a long story, how much do you want to hear?" 1/
In August 2001, I was assigned to the Pentagon for the first time in my career. That's because I was selected for promotion to Brigadier General, but first had to serve in a "Joint Assignment" as per law.

Our family left the high Mojave Desert and we drove to DC in July. 2/
Arriving at the Pentagon, I was told I couldn't assume the position until the Senate confirmed my promotion. My boss, a great 3-star Marine, gave me stuff to read & told me to lay low until the Senate acted.

After 3 weeks, he told me to take some leave. That was 3 Sept. 3/
Read 18 tweets
29 Jul 20
"The plan to pull US troops from the long-time NATO ally has been met with broad bipartisan opposition amid concerns that it will weaken the US military's position vis a vis Russia, however the Trump Administration has decided to proceed with the move." 1/ (of 15)
Having just watched the SecDef, Vice CJCS and @US_EUCOM Commander, I am sickened by this decision and explanation.

It is not tied to any strategic advantage, and in fact is counterproductive to showing strength in Europe.

A couple things:

2/
First, what is obvious to me - having served 12 years in Germany and having participated in the last force structure change from 2004-2011, this is not a "strategic" move...it is specifically a directed personal insult from Trump to our great & very supportive ally Germany.
3/
Read 18 tweets
27 Jun 20
Report of Russia bounties on US Troops in Afghanistan is shocking but not surprising. There was intel on their arms transfers and support of the Taliban months ago.

Putin wants payback for our actions against their forces in Syria and for us supplying the Muj in the 1980s. 1/
The fact that no action was taken is also shocking, but not surprising with this administration.

The process of sound diplomatic engagements, application of strategy & policy, and use of all elements of national power is broken.

But it's not just with Russia. 2/
The multi-year strategy to address N.Korean missiles still simmers, and seems more dangerous than ever...
usnews.com/news/world-rep… 3/
Read 12 tweets
26 Jun 20
During this @WIMSummit conference last night, we spoke briefly about the importance of "communicating in a crisis."

After watching the @HHSGov briefing a few minutes ago, perhaps it's timely to share some thoughts on communicating... 1/12
First, communicating has many factors:
-Who's the messenger, what's the forum and what are the objectives?
-What are the facts?
-What's the message?
-How does body language, facial expression, tone of voice contribute?
...and most importantly, is there a basis of trust? 2/12
The key communicator(messenger(s)) must:
-have expertise
-must have the trust of the audience (if not, he/she must find ways to quickly establish that trust)
-speak plainly and clearly, after rehearsing
-establish a vision for what will happen 3/12
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!