No head of state ever reads every word of an FTA. In fact does anybody? Dozens of pages of rules of origin, product-by-product?
I am ready to say he hasn’t, nor should he.
And yes yes head of government. But the Queen shouldn’t either...
Just to make sure - of course the head of government SHOULD be aware of all major decisions and their impact. And yes, I would argue that includes reading some of the text.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Holger Hestermeyer

Holger Hestermeyer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hhesterm

15 Jan
And divergence is in the news again. And Peter gets the order exactly right: before we even get to rebalancing, we should have a discussion: do we actually WANT the different rules and here a fundamental problem kicks in (thread)
The EU debate has been messed up for a long time, because too often public debate became "the EU forces us to do X, how dare they". And the nuance was gone. What nuance?
The nuance that on the EU level much like on the national level some people push left, some people push right, some yell "vegan bonanza" others "beef boom" and in the end you get to an outcome, quite often with a significant UK impact.
Read 5 tweets
15 Jan
Some quick thoughts at what's going on in Brexit (thread)
What's happening is not unexpected. And there are a number of causes: 1) non-tariff barriers as a consequence of moving from CU+SM to FTA 2) teething problems made worse because 3) no prep time for an FTA announced last second.
Over time, a new normal will settle in with higher transport costs, more red tape and less trade.
Read 6 tweets
14 Jan
Many excellent contributions on the future of EU-UK relations by @SamuelMarcLowe , @fromTGA , @DavidHenigUK . Maybe the debate could be summarised as follows (short thread)
For a while UK politics will inevitably be looking for regulatory divergence with the EU. After that there are two scenarios: either the debate continues to focus on divergence at all cost - without regard to the regulatory content. In that case the TCA will fail.
Or we enter calmer waters, regulation is debated on its merits, divergence will happen here and there, but the obsession with being different fades away. In that case, a partnership can built. That partnership can go further than the TCA also on trade...
Read 4 tweets
11 Jan
EU-UK TCA - parliamentary scrutiny edition (Thread)
The EU-UK TCA is an EU-only FTA. Technically the partners are the UK and the EU. So let's start with them /2
On the UK side scrutiny takes two forms: debate of implementing legislation and CRaG 2010 treaty scrutiny. /3
Read 23 tweets
10 Jan
Quick "what should we be upset about" state of Brexit thread because of the article by @tobyhelm theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
To start off - this actually is a zero-tariff and zero-quota deal. Which, for "normal" free trade agreements is unusually good. (Yes, wait for it)...
In every FTA only qualifying goods get these conditions. Yes. Rules of origin. This is a difficult topic and requires administration. The deal is not unusual in that regard at all.
Read 15 tweets
7 Jan
For two days we now had surprise at the fact that Rules of origin become relevant in UK-EU trade. A surprise that, as @SamuelMarcLowe has eloquently pointed out, surprises trade people. So: a very very short thread on: WHY are there rules of origin?
And FTA is concluded between 2 (or more) parties. So it benefits those parties. Not others. What does that mean for goods? It benefits goods "from those parties". How do you know that the goods are from those parties? Well, that's what RoOs do.
Why can we not just get rid of this unnecessary red tape? Quite simple. Let's say the government says: there shall be no red tape.
From tomorrow on, China would export every single item it exports to the UK via the EU. And it would be tariff-free.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!