1. About Erin O’Toole — some conspiracy theorists wonder if we really had an interview with him. It’s a weird question, since you can read the interview here: rebelnews.com/exclusive_erin… The whole interaction was done over email, so I’ll share some screenshots.
2. As you know, we had the scoop of the year with our TheChinaFiles.com story. We broke the news, it was reported around the world, from the @globeandmail to @TuckerCarlson. Huge story, right on brand for @erinotoole who raised it in question period.
3. O’Toole had a press conference on the story (my scoop!) I dialed in but oddly enough I wasn’t chosen to ask a question. The CBC got two and so did CP, even though they never actually asked about the documents. That’s odd. So I sent a DM to O’Toole who follows me on Twitter.
4. I was delighted to receive an email back from O’Toole’s press secretary, @ChelsMTucker. She said he was just too busy to do the interview that day.
5. No problem. But could Tucker please clarify: was O’Toole really just too busy, or was @AndrewScheer’s unpopular boycott of Rebel News still in effect? I asked twice: are you still banning us? If so, please tell me and I’ll stop pestering you! (Yellow highlights in original).
6. To my delight, Tucker wrote back assuring me that O’Toole was indeed engaging with us. We are members of the Independent Press Gallery, and O’Toole had a TV one-on-one with our Keean Bexte. It really just was a question of time — could we do it in writing instead?
6. Well, I wasn’t thrilled — we are a TV outlet, not a newspaper, we like video. Again I asked her if we were still banned. I grumbled a bit but I sent over my interview questions. Frankly, they were softballs.
7. And then I thought @ChelsMTucker panicked. Because I didn’t hear back. I assumed I wouldn’t — I assumed she was told by her bosses to keep the Scheer ban on Rebel News in place. But I kept asking. If the answer is “go away”, just say so. I checked four times.
8. I mean, seriously: when you Tories are done your S&M sessions with the CBC, come on over for a real question about a real issue. Or not.
9. And then — it was a Christmas miracle! — I got the answers to my interview questions. It was so late in the year, I didn’t want to have the story buried in the Christmas break. Since they were exclusive comments I knew I wouldn’t be scooped if I waited till after Christmas.
10. As you can see, the answers to my series of questions were written in the first person. “As Prime Minister I...”. So it was obviously from Erin O’Toole. But I was being meticulous. So I checked. Yup: it’s O’Toole (duh).
11. So that’s it. The entire exchange was by email — and you have just seen it all. I DM’d O’Toole, he had his assistant email me, I asked for a TV interview, they offered one by email instead, they finally sent over some good answers, to be quoted in the boss’s name. QED.
12. So what changed between Monday morning and Monday afternoon when O’Toole practiced a little cancel culture? Which he repeatedly promised he would stand up to? He folded in a matter of hours!
13. Did I misquote him? No, we published his answers verbatim. Did we engage in any questionable conduct? Of course not. Was it an interview? Of course — a series of questions and answers between a journalist and a politician. Done by email at their request.
14. My favourite line in the Globe story was thi: "“Mr. O’Toole did not have an interview with the Rebel and will not in the future,” Mr. O’Toole’s press secretary Chelsea Tucker said in an e-mail. She did not say why Mr. O’Toole’s office agreed to the interview." Ha!
15. So we're doing a poll -- should O'Toole ban Rebel News? Here's a video I did about the ban:
16. Here are the results so far: 73 people think we should be banned. 6,598 don't think so. What do you think? VOTE NOW! BanRebelNews.com
Weird. He just did a whole email interview with me. I thought it was pretty good. He doesn’t really explain what changed other than the obvious: he folds under pressure. Liberals have his number now. I guess all that “cancel culture” stuff was just to win the leadership. #Scheer2
If you are a Conservative leader, but you do whatever the Liberals and the CBC tell you to do, you probably don’t have the stuff to withstand an election. Too bad — we need a guy with guts. I would have expected more from a military man.
In politics, appeasing your opponents doesn’t win them over. You just give them unearned moral authority; you give them a veto over you. Ask Rosemary Barton how Andrew Scheer’s appeasement worked on her. But more important: it demoralizes the party base, who love Rebel News.
I’m sorry. This video is the tipping point for me. For 48 years I have been pro-police, almost fanatically so. I cannot say that anymore. I know there are still good cops out there. Some are my friends. But as the violent enforcers of the lockdown I no longer support them.
I agree with @jkenney’s defence of the airlines. We should get back to normal as soon as possible. But not for the enforcers of the lockdown. Not for the ruling class. You can’t lock down the poors and then sneak off to Hawaii. If Kenney won’t FireAllard.com, we will.
We have 3,010 @RebelNewsOnline supporters in Grande Prairie. I dare say that’s more than @TracyAllardUCP has in her constituency organization. If she won’t step down, we will kick her out.
I encourage @TracyAllardUCP’s board to disown and disavow her now. Or we’ll replace them too.
1. I think we have a window here into the systemic problems with @CalgaryPolice.
They're obsessed with being woke, with racial & gender quotas, with politics. So they hire people who are emotionally unsuited to policing, like the two abusers who attacked that hockey player.
2. @CalgaryPolice are now explicitly hiring for qualities other than competence. They're hiring based on politics. And so the two quote hires who attacked the hockey teen know nothing about how to actually handle a real-life policing situation. They panicked and it showed.
3. A real policeman would use his discretion; would, at most, have "lectured" the teen. @nenshi's abusive cops swore at him; wouldn't answer what he did wrong; were violent; and drew their weapons improperly. Such a discredit to real police everywhere.
Hello my friend. Bullying and brutality by police and security have been my primary concern about 2020, and it will surely be worse in 2021. Our viewers have crowdfunded civil liberties lawyers to fight back. Here's our latest case, in Toronto: HelpJoshua.com
Actually, come to think of it, that's not our latest case -- we launched a new civil liberties battle literally this morning, defending a father of five who was fined for playing with his kids in a park:
Here we are, hiring a lawyer for a pastor who was fined $1,200 for feeding the homeless -- police said it was an "illegal gathering":
He says he received an "order" from @epdevilla under the Health Protection Act to seize @adamsonbarbecue. But she has no such power under the law; she has to go to a judge to get an order. Did she?
2. To be accurate, Supt. Sinopoli says @epdevilla "ESSENTIALLY giving us her power" under the act. What does that mean? Can we see this "order" please? Is @epdevilla a judge now?
3. Here's a copy of the Health Protection Act: ontario.ca/laws/statute/9… Police are mentioned in only two cases -- arresting a "Typhoid Mary"-type superspreader under s. 35, and having access to a locked premises under s. 43. Neither apply to your 100-cop SWAT-style raid.