1/ Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 303

Exciting day. @UCSF Grand Rounds, we covered our vaccine rollout, vaccine issues more generally (w/ @drpauloffit), & then the new viral variants (w/ Charles Chiu @cychiu98. On youtube here: Worth a watch.
2/ A few highlights. First, the UCSF vaccine experience, w/ Susan Smith & Desi Kotis. We’ve now delivered 20,261 shots, and we’re doing well with just-in-time vaccination –we've injected 84% of supply. We get ~1 week notice of when more is coming, but it’s not always accurate.
3/ Our current dashboard is below. We’ve now offered vaccine to 99% of those in Phase 1A. 77% have received first dose, and 17% have received 2nd dose. 83% of our highest priority group (subgroup a) have been vaccinated; 56% have already received shot #2.
4/ At this point, we’re moving beyond our front-line staff, beginning to invite our patients over 75 (soon 65, but we need to work through the operational details first), as well as opening up to SF physicians and staff who aren’t UCSF affiliated. I’m glad – it’s crucial…
5/ …that we begin vaccinating patients, & I’m glad we’re starting w/ those at highest risk. I’m also pleased that we (& other large healthcare systems in SF) are now ready to help vaccinate physicians & office staffs who lack institutional affiliations; up to now, it’s been…
6/ …unclear who would.

We’ve seen very few vaccine side effects; 2 people had allergic reactions that required Benadryl, none needed epinephrine. And nice to see that relatively few of our people have chosen not to be vaccinated; we suspect that that the 20% of people…
7/ … who were eligible but haven’t been vaccinated have mostly been thwarted by the process (email access, signing into the patient portal, that sort of thing). While there is doubtless some vaccine hesitancy among UCSF people, it doesn't seem to be a major issue – reassuring.
8/ Nice to hear relatively optimistic view from @drpauloffit, who thinks we’ll overcome the slow rollout & reach herd immunity at a lower vaccinated proportion than is the conventional wisdom. Paul thinks it’ll be more like 60% than 80%. Some of this is because the path to …
9/…herd immunity is the combo of vaccinated population & those with prior infections (the latter group already makes up ~20% of U.S. population). Paul also thinks cases will fall as weather warms.

And also: "we’ll have an administration that has a clue, so that’s good.”
10/ Caveat re: lower herd immunity threshold is that it requires that vaccines not only prevent cases of Covid, but also asymptomatic shedding/contagion. He's optimistic: “I believe that, though you may be asymptomatically infected [after vaccination]...you will shed less virus.”
11/ Paul is also quite reassuring about the safety & efficacy of the vaccines. For one thing, he and other vaccine experts cannot think of a historical example of a serious vaccine side effect that emerged more than a couple of months after a vaccine came into general use.
12/ Offit also critiqued the roll-out so far. The U.S. de-risked vaccine development with a $24M investment, he noted. “At the same time we were doing that, we should have put in an infrastructure [to actually deliver vaccinations],” which we did not do. It was a huge error.
13/ Part of the problem is that Operation Warp Speed placed the Defense Dept. in charge of distribution. It was a “clash of cultures;” the DoD was concerned about trucks getting hijacked, but didn’t really think through the problem of getting vaccines from freezers into arms.
14/ Paul is not a fan of the argument (which @ashishkjha and I made in the @washingtonpost tinyurl.com/y7c6v9hz) that 2nd dose should be delayed in order to vaccinate more people w/ first dose more quickly. He worries about the messaging, particularly that people may say,…
15/ ...“I hear 1st dose is 80-90% effective, why should I get 2nd dose?" I respect Paul a lot and this is a reasonable concern. Receiving 2nd dose (at some point) is crucial.

He's fine w/ decision to release 2nd doses from stockpile; he doesn’t think 2-5 wk delay is a problem.
16/ We also heard from Charles Chiu @cychiu98, @UCSF virology expert, who described the new viral variants. His talk reinforced our thinking about the UK variant (more infectious, but not more virulent or able to evade vaccination) & the South African variant…
17/ … which may or may not be more infectious, but has changes that, at least theoretically, may lead to less effective vaccination (though vaccine likely will have some benefit, possibly just less).

Luckily, this variant has not yet been found in the U.S.
18/ Reassuringly, Charles doesn’t think that exponential growth of either variant is inevitable in the U.S. But they could grow fast (as UK variant did in England). The new variants make it even more critical that we get people vaccinated as quickly as possible.
19/ Hope you have a chance to watch, it's here:

Other news today: appointment of @ASlavitt to help lead the administration's Covid response. Andy is one of my heroes – it’s an inspired choice that increases the chance of getting Covid response right.
20/ Biden team also announced its Covid plans today; they seem spot on tinyurl.com/y3nyyp3c Huge investments in testing, vaccination, schools, & supporting people & cities/health depts. Yes, it's expensive, but far less costly than Covid – in lives, anguish, illness, & money.
21/ Overall, I finished the day more optimistic than I started, both that we’re going to turn things around on Covid and on what life may be like under the Biden administration – an administration that will begin in 132 hours, 12 minutes, and 36 seconds. But who’s counting?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bob Wachter

Bob Wachter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Bob_Wachter

13 Jan
I can’t prove cause and effect, but since @ashishkjha & I published our 2 editorials on vaccine distribution – one @washingtonpost advocating we consider deferring 2nd doses in order to give more people first doses quickly tinyurl.com/y7c6v9hz... and another in the... (1/12)
... @nytimes recommending a much simpler allocation system (age first, then random allocation via lottery) tinyurl.com/y2mqqxae – the Biden administration has made moves to embrace the spirit of both recommendations, which is great. (2/12)
Last week, Biden team announced that they’ll no longer withhold 2nd doses – recognizing (as our WashPo piece advocated) that pushing 2nd dose back a few weeks (which may happen) is likely less risky than giving half as many people their 1st dose tinyurl.com/y3tnn2pr (3/12)
Read 12 tweets
7 Jan
Today @nytimes, @ashishkjha & I make the case for a more straightforward, less-gameable & (we think) more equitable way to roll out vaccines: older people first, then use a lottery. tinyurl.com/y24vncws. Here's our reasoning: (1/15)
(It's worth noting that ours is part of a set of 4 interesting articles, the others on targeting hot spots, not pressuring the vaccine-hesitant, and a better way of thinking about distribution algorithms. All worth your time.) (2/15)
Our thinking: after we finish healthcare workers & people in nursing homes, question is: who goes next? Efforts to prioritize groups like "essential workers" & people with pre-existing conditions seem reasonable, but we fear that they are devolving into an unworkable mess. (3/15)
Read 15 tweets
7 Jan
How is the person at Walgreens or CVS going to verify that someone is a bus driver, or a grocery store clerk, or a preschool teacher? A note from HR? The honor system? Really?

And preexisting conditions are even harder. Will you need a note from your doctor? What if.... (5/15)
...you don't have a primary care MD? And what's a pre-existing condition? Diabetes, sure. How about diet-controlled diabetes? Pre-diabetes? Cancer, of course. I had a fairly benign type of thyroid cancer in my 20s. 40 yrs later, I'm pretty sure I'm cured. Does that count? (6/15)
In the end, @ashishkjha & I felt that – in a well-intended effort to promote equity thru distribution – we had built a system so complex that it would actually be inequitable. Why? Who figures out how to get ahead in complex systems? The privileged. Exhibit A: the tax code (7/15)
Read 11 tweets
6 Jan
1/ Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 294

Lots to talk about, so today I’ll do an update on things @UCSFHospitals (now adding vaccine rollout), SF and CA. Then quick takes on a bunch of issues, mostly vaccine-related. The news is coming fast and furious – too much of it bad.
2/ Let’s start @UCSFHospitals, now having our biggest surge yet: 83 pts, 14 on vents (Fig L). It’s busy but it's not yet stressing our capacity in both hospital & ICU. Test positivity rate 5.1% overall – 16% (highest yet) in symptomatic pts; 2% (stable) in asymptomatics (Fig R).
3/ Interesting that our hospital cases keep rising despite fewer new cases in SF – down to 237/day from peak of 290 (Fig L). But a worrisome new uptick – might be holiday/New Year’s effect. Test positivity rate pretty close to @UCSF’s: 4.49%. SF hospitalizations=218 (Fig R), w/…
Read 24 tweets
4 Jan
As expected, our @washingtonpost editorial today on the delayed second dose vaccine strategy has generated a vigorous and interesting dialogue. tinyurl.com/y7c6v9hz Here are my takeaways (a thread): 1/18
The debate is healthy. There are pros and cons to the current strategy and the alternative we present, and there are real uncertainties associated with them both. They should debated thoughtful and studied to the degree possible. 2/18
Many people seem focused on the source of the delays in vaccination, as if it matters whether the bottleneck is from vaccine production or distribution/injection. I don’t think it does. Starting soon, there will be doses available and people to inject them – and... 3/18
Read 18 tweets
31 Dec 20
U.S. is now considering idea of a single vaccination shot, delaying shot #2 until months later. Last wk, I thought that was a bad idea – the trials that found 95% efficacy were 2 shots; why add extra complexity & a new curveball. But facts on the ground demand a rethink. (1/7)
The two main changes are the slower-than-expected vaccine rollout and the new variant virus being found in the U.S. Both demand that we turbocharge the process of getting a large chunk of the population at least partly protected. (2/7)
Here's my back-of-the-envelope math:
- Single shot seems to be about 80% protective after a month
- 2nd shot adds some efficacy (up to 95% protective), and maybe (tho not yet proven) some durability.
- New variant is here, and undoubtedly far more widespread than we know. (3/7)
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!