OK! It's time for #WealthOfNations Book I, Chapter 11! Which is longer than all of Book II. Are you ready? Are we ready? Can anybody really be ready? #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And it's all about...the rent of land, or the price paid for the use of the land where production takes place. Gripping! It's naturally a monopoly price, says Smith. (I.xi.a.1,5) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
You might think, says Smith, that the rent of land is partly the result of improvements to the land (I.xi.a.2) but you'd be wrong. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
It's really all about the price of what's produced and therefore what the tenant can afford to pay. Because of the monopoly thing, surplus value goes to the landlord. (I.xi.a.6–9) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
This means that rent is related to price in a special way, if you're #AdamSmith. High wages and profit are the 𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 of high prices, but because landlords hoover up surplus value, high rents are the 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵 of high prices. (I.xi.a.8) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
What kind of produce always affords rent? Food! It's 'cause everyone's gotta eat. (Really, that's the explanation.) (I.xi.b.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The need for food, which takes a lot of land to produce back in the 18thC, is also the cause of trade between town and country. And so, as we learnt thoroughly in I.iii, roads, canals, etc. that make the country accessible matter, too! (I.xi.b.5) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
We, the SmithTweeters, are so happy for the opportunity to read this book through with you. But OMG SMITH WE DON'T NEED TO KNOW THE PRICE OF EVERY HECKIN THING YOU SEE AROUND YOU. Ahem. (I.xi.b.6–37) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
These price comparisons are meant to convey the importance of covering the costs of improvements/insurance and of the relative price differences between, say, beef and wheat when thinking about how land is going to be improved and used. (I.xi.b.6–27) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
So long as all production has to compete for land with non-optional food production (everyone's gotta eat!), land rents will all be at least partly regulated by the prices and production of the common crops that sustain the people. (I.xi.b.28) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Special case: if there isn't enough land to meet the demand for something, e.g., the most fashionable/scarce wines, the price will exceed the cost of wages, profit, and transport. This makes landlords happy, 'cause they get the rest. (I.xi.b.31–34) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And, as Adam Smith would have predicted, this leads landlords to call for restrictions on the development of land to produce those goods. Or they might burn excess product. Smith doubts this is the secret to sustained high rents. (I.xi.b.27–33) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Now Smith spends some time speculating on whether there might be better crops for landlords to encourage than beef and corn. Rice has high yields, but boglands where rice is grown don't have a lot of other uses. (I.xi.b.35–38) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The British East India Company (Smith was no fan) was influenced by Smith's claim that potatoes would produce more food (reducing famine) and make for better (and more beautiful!) workers #DigressionOnPotatoes (I.xi.b.39–42) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
So the East India Company pushed for potato cultivation to try to raise their rents. It didn't really make sense if you knew as much about India as, say, Indians did. But when did that ever stop colonists? #DigressionOnPotatoes (I.xi.b.39–42) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
We do not think that Smith would have been a fan of the use of this part of the text to further and justify imperialism. But we hope he might have enjoyed a masala dosa. #DigressionOnPotatoes (I.xi.b.39–42) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Just to be clear: Potatoes would have made it to India anyway, and Indians would have found the best way to use them. But it's SO WEIRD that the way they were actually introduced is related to these few paragraphs. #DigressionOnPotatoes (I.xi.b.39–42) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
So the next time you enjoy aloo matar, think of Adam Smith, the colonized peoples who managed to make something their own in spite of physical, legal, and cultural oppression, and weird happenstance. #DigressionOnPotatoes (I.xi.b.39–42) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Does anyone else feel like #AdamSmith has been talking about Rent for a really long time already? Like 525, 600 minutes, maybe? Here we go again! #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
So land that produces food will always produce rent. (Yes. We are still talking about rent. We are talking about rent forever. This is our life now.) (I.xi.d.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The more food we produce, the more people can be alive! 🎉The more people, the more demand for stuff. And so the production of food, which always pays rent, supports the production of everything else that can pay rent. (I.xi.d.1) #RentRentRent#WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
If you're a keener, you might have observed yesterday that people need more than just food. Like, say, clothing and shelter. #AdamSmith is ON IT. (I.xi.c.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Before land was improved, there was lots of material for clothing and housing, but not enough food for all the people. Once the land is improved to grow food, clothing and shelter become scarce (and valuable). (I.xi.c.3) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Yesterday #AdamSmith said things work pretty well when people have perfect liberty to choose a trade and where to practice it? In this half of the chapter he specifies the ways people aren’t at perfect liberty, and whose fault it is. (I.x.c.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And (spoiler) it's government policy’s fault! They restrain competition in some places, increase it in others, and obstruct free movement of labor. (I.x.c.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Many government restraints on competition are “as foolish as can well be imagined.” Like how coachmakers can’t make the wheels for coaches, but wheelmakers can make coaches. (I.x.c.9) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
If a society has perfect liberty and if workers are perfectly free to choose, they will naturally move to the most advantageous forms of employment. Those are some big ifs, but we can be 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 at this, if not perfect. (I.x.a.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Today we're gonna talk about profits. They come from stock! #AdamSmith reminds us that stock is any resource paid for in advance when doing business. In general, profits and wages don't move together. (I.ix.1–2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
As stock goes up, there's more of it to employ more workers (by paying them or providing machines for them to work or both). This raises wages! But new stock competes with existing stock, which tends to lower profit. (I.ix.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
If you thought figuring out the average wages of labor was complicated, don't even think about trying to figure out the average profit of stock. Basically impossible. Luckily, the rate of interest tends to vary with the profits of stock. (I.ix.3–4) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Good morning, Smithketeers! Time for Book One, Chapter 8 of #AdamSmith's #WealthOfNations. Today, we're talking wages. Not that they're a topic with any contemporary relevance, or anything. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
It’s a state of nature story, like Locke or Hobbes or Rousseau, but Smith’s state of nature is defined by the product of each person’s labor belonging to that person. Sounds great, but again, we don’t want to get paid in SmithTweets. (I.viii.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets