If you're a keener, you might have observed yesterday that people need more than just food. Like, say, clothing and shelter. #AdamSmith is ON IT. (I.xi.c.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Before land was improved, there was lots of material for clothing and housing, but not enough food for all the people. Once the land is improved to grow food, clothing and shelter become scarce (and valuable). (I.xi.c.3) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Hunters and gatherers must have had so much extra material for clothing and shelter that some of it was thrown away. But once they were given access to an expanded market, they could trade their surplus and it became valuable. (I.xi.c.4) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Food is really the binding constraint, Smith reminds us. But once you've got it sorted, clothing and housing tends to follow. (I.xi.c.6) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Once you start improving the land, less labor is needed to feed the same number of people, and so they can turn their resources to fulfilling other wants and fancies. It's that special sauce: The Division of Labor at work. (I.xi.c.7) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
(This applies, by the way, to rich and poor people more or less equally. How much someone eats isn't affected by how rich they are, say Smith. So it's not like rich people can eat all the food and leave nothing for the rest.) (I.xi.c.7) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The rich consume other things at a higher rate than the poor. By producing frivolous trinkets for the rich, even the poor can earn enough to make sure they're fed, clothed, and sheltered. It's not perfect, but it gets the job done. (I.xi.c.7) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
All this matters because it explains why food isn't just the original source of rent, but the thing that makes rent from every other sort of production possible. (I.xi.c.8) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Coal mines were not always a great investment, sometimes not even producing enough income to pay rent. Plus their produce tends to be for local markets. On the other hand, metal mines produce for the world market and tend to pay rent. (I.xi.c.10–23) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Because they're operating in a world market, metal mines' revenue was a result of their richness. Less rich mines could be outcompeted by the discovery of more rich mines, for example Peruvian silver mines. (I.xi.c.23–25) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Taxes on mines work a lot like rent, except when revenues won't cover rent the landlord can work the mine, whereas when revenues won't cover tax the mine won't be worked at all (or the metal will be smuggled to avoid the tax.) (I.xi.c.25–28) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The lowest price for precious metals depends on covering the cost of stock and labor. But the highest price? That's all about scarcity! At least, if you're Smith. The demand, he says, comes from their beauty. (I.xi.c.29–31) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Finding lots of precious metals or precious stones won't make the world much richer: They're only so valuable because they're scarce. If we get more, they'll just become cheaper. #ButWaitDoesntThatMakeUsWealthier (I.xi.c.34) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
(This, Smith says, is why the less developed gold- and silver-rich countries discovered by Spain were so ill-prepared for Spanish lust for gold and silver. Pretty gold pebbles on the ground were worth less than food. #DiamondWaterParadox (I.xi.c.36)) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Above ground production, though, makes us richer. The more land is improved, the more valuable other land becomes. More food➡more people➡more wants and fancies➡production even on land that won't yield food. (I.xi.c.35–36) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And if you can make enough money from your production, what can you get from that land? Rent! (I.xi.c.35–36) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Oh King Edward III, it’s adorable that you think you can just decree that servants and laborers become permanently content with wages fixed at the rate they were at five years ago. gph.is/1Uy1VKJ (I.xi.e.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
He’s already digressing, and he can’t take a minute to share the menu from that famously magnificent feast with us? (I.xi.e.4–5) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Does anyone else feel like #AdamSmith has been talking about Rent for a really long time already? Like 525, 600 minutes, maybe? Here we go again! #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
So land that produces food will always produce rent. (Yes. We are still talking about rent. We are talking about rent forever. This is our life now.) (I.xi.d.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The more food we produce, the more people can be alive! 🎉The more people, the more demand for stuff. And so the production of food, which always pays rent, supports the production of everything else that can pay rent. (I.xi.d.1) #RentRentRent#WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
OK! It's time for #WealthOfNations Book I, Chapter 11! Which is longer than all of Book II. Are you ready? Are we ready? Can anybody really be ready? #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And it's all about...the rent of land, or the price paid for the use of the land where production takes place. Gripping! It's naturally a monopoly price, says Smith. (I.xi.a.1,5) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
You might think, says Smith, that the rent of land is partly the result of improvements to the land (I.xi.a.2) but you'd be wrong. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Yesterday #AdamSmith said things work pretty well when people have perfect liberty to choose a trade and where to practice it? In this half of the chapter he specifies the ways people aren’t at perfect liberty, and whose fault it is. (I.x.c.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And (spoiler) it's government policy’s fault! They restrain competition in some places, increase it in others, and obstruct free movement of labor. (I.x.c.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Many government restraints on competition are “as foolish as can well be imagined.” Like how coachmakers can’t make the wheels for coaches, but wheelmakers can make coaches. (I.x.c.9) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
If a society has perfect liberty and if workers are perfectly free to choose, they will naturally move to the most advantageous forms of employment. Those are some big ifs, but we can be 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 at this, if not perfect. (I.x.a.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Today we're gonna talk about profits. They come from stock! #AdamSmith reminds us that stock is any resource paid for in advance when doing business. In general, profits and wages don't move together. (I.ix.1–2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
As stock goes up, there's more of it to employ more workers (by paying them or providing machines for them to work or both). This raises wages! But new stock competes with existing stock, which tends to lower profit. (I.ix.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
If you thought figuring out the average wages of labor was complicated, don't even think about trying to figure out the average profit of stock. Basically impossible. Luckily, the rate of interest tends to vary with the profits of stock. (I.ix.3–4) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets