🚨🚨🚨Science advisor and OSTP director will become a Cabinet position!🚨🚨🚨

Eric Lander will be among the first non-physicists in the role. This is exciting.

washingtonpost.com/science/2021/0…
If you're following me you're probably aware that the presidential science advisor position is a bit of an obsession for me. Here's the #longread I put up a couple months back on the position's history. It's weird and fun and interesting, I swear.

davelevitan.medium.com/the-presidents…
And here's my piece for @WIRED from late 2016 where I went to the WH and interviewed Obama's science advisor:
Here's some weird and wild documents relating to presidential science advisors I found in a few archives a few years ago:

And finally, here's my piece for @mental_floss on the letters that presidential science advisors received from the nation's crazy people over the years:

mentalfloss.com/article/541371…
Okay all that random stuff aside, science advisor to the president is a fascinating position with a fascinating history, and the fact that Biden has made it a Cabinet-level appointment is SUPER interesting.
One more thing: Back in the 60s, there was talk of creating a Department of Science in the executive branch. Among the people helping shoot this down was Nixon's first science advisor Lee Dubridge. Why?
Because science was *everywhere* he argued. Everyone in government (then) used a typewriter -- do we have a Department of Typewriters?

Elevating the science advisor position to the Cabinet isn't a Department of Typewriters, but it's an acknowledgement that EVERYONE types.
Anyway @eric_lander, please let me interview you immediately, thank you.
Ok predictably I wasn't actually done:

For 70 years, the president's science advisors were physicists. At first, this made sense -- it was more or less a "let's get ready for a nuclear war" position in the early years. ...
Obama's advisor John Holdren was an interesting compromise -- a physicist, who even gave a Nobel Prize acceptance speech on behalf of the Pugwash Conferences, on nuclear disarmament, but also a climate change expert who saw that as the defining issue of his tenure.
Elevating life sciences to the role now is an AWESOME idea. Climate change is now everywhere -- and Biden's appointments and plans make clear that it will dominate his policy choices. An advisor who can now help elevate CRISPR, and antibiotic resistance, and so on, will be HUGE.
Okay ONE more. Here are three ways presidential administrations dealt with/saw their advisors and OSTP. I find this instructive.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dave Levitan

Dave Levitan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davelevitan

16 Jan
Biden is introducing his science team: pscp.tv/w/1DXGyRlbgPyJM
It's the first time the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology has all-female leadership.
[adjusts glasses]

Biden said FDR asked his "science advisor" for guidance in 1944.

But there was no such thing. He asked Vannevar Bush, an unofficial advisor. But there was no such thing as a presidential science advisor for another seven years.

[unadjusts glasses]
Read 7 tweets
15 Jan
This is a remarkable account, and makes clear again that it is absolutely incredible that no lawmakers were killed.

newyorker.com/magazine/2021/…
Also, this seems like the kind of situation where no matter what @SenTedCruz might say about it, if these guys *think* he's on their side, he pretty much is.
Virtually indistinguishable from the rise of the Nazis
Read 5 tweets
30 Dec 20
The big New Yorker thing on covid is very impressive for sure but come on how is table 1 of an academic paper "buried"
lol did none of them read/see The Big Short
Look it's an enormous piece and full of great reporting and I know I'm being Salty Science Writer here but it does have a collection of minor misstatements/mis-characterizations of the science that you aren't likely to find in, say, @edyong209's stories.

newyorker.com/magazine/2021/…
Read 4 tweets
18 Jul 20
Shoutout to all the politicians rapturously memorializing John Lewis today while simultaneously working as hard as they possibly can to restrict voting rights.
Rep. Barry Loudermilk
Rep. Glenn Thompson
Read 20 tweets
3 Dec 19
I decided to do a bit of a close read of one particular part of a 1965 report sent to Lyndon Johnson, on atmospheric carbon dioxide. Because I hate myself, you see.

climatefiles.com/climate-change…
They acknowledge that at that point, firm predictions were hard. Okay. But also, this ⬇️.

[mashes calculator furiously]
[checks current CO2 concentration]

Ah, well, shit.
They knew, in 1965, that the 1885-1940 increase in CO2 likely led to half a degree C of warming. Which uh, maybe should have raised a few more alarm bells?
Read 15 tweets
9 Nov 19
Yes, it was the scientists who were wrong. They have doomed us all.
Woof. Okay, I have some thoughts.

nytimes.com/2019/11/08/opi…
The basic premise of this lengthy piece is that the rapidity of many climate change processes and impacts has shocked -- shocked! -- many scientists, and that their failure to predict well has helped lead us to our current predicament of fucked-ness. But. BUT.
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!