🚨 BREAKING CENSUS NEWS: The Trump administration pledges it will stand down on reporting #2020Census numbers—including, but not limited to, citizenship numbers—in a significant victory for our lawsuit challenging the rushed count. 🧵👇 @BrennanCenter
The federal government has pledged in writing to a federal court that it will not release any census data—including citizenship data for apportionment or redistricting—during the remainder of Trump's term. @BrennanCenter
In exchange, we have agreed to a three-week pause in our case, which has been traveling quickly toward trial in March.
This pledge has been memorialized in a joint stipulation filed this evening in the federal court in the Northern District of California and accepted by Judge Koh.
What this means...
1. This ENDS any attempts to rush the count out before Trump leaves office and, by extension, to rush out numbers with undocumented people removed. Before today, the admin. had not expressly committed to this, only suggested the rush might be off.
Now, it is officially OFF.
2. The Census Bureau will have more time to work on the numbers before they are released, instead of facing an artificial deadline of completing the task before President Trump leaves office. This increases the likelihood of a full, fair, and accurate count.
3. The Presidential Memorandum to exclude undocumented people from the Count—which was in front of SCOTUS at the end of November—will NOT be implemented under Trump. This ensures that the count won't be illegally reduced, in violation of the Constitution and federal statutes.
4. This agreement is a next step, not the final step. Our case is on pause, not concluded.
We will continue to work to get all the time necessary to ensure that communities of color and other undercounted communities are fully counted and receive the political power and federal funding that the law guarantees them.
We will also continue to hold the federal government to the highest standard. And we’re looking ahead to the next steps in the case.
And, make no mistake, there have already been many steps in this case! We filed our complaint back in August. brennancenter.org/our-work/analy…
❗️BREAKING SCOTUS has announced it will take a wait-and-see approach to Trump’s proposal to manipulate the #2020Census results by excluding undocumented people. In short: Big gamble, wrong on the law, VERY bad policy.
Unpacking this new development in the 🧵👇 @BrennanCenter
Back in July, President Trump issued a Presidential Memorandum—known as the “Exclusion Memo”--stating that it would now be US policy to exclude undocumented people from the census head count used to divvy up seats in the US House. npr.org/2020/07/21/892…
❗️CENSUS NEWS: A federal court has ordered the Trump administration to produce documents shedding light on the rushed close to the 2020 Census, granting our motion to compel production in our ongoing challenge. @BrennanCenter (short🧵👇)
Back in April, when the covid pandemic erupted across the country, the Census Bureau’s experts put forward a plan to ensure that everyone got counted AND stayed safe and healthy.
Today's San Jose ruling that Trump can't exclude undocumented people from the #2020Census is smart. And not just because the panel got the issues right. It makes it MUCH harder for the Supreme Court to do the wrong thing and for Trump to worm out. Let's unpack it 🧵@BrennanCenter
Context: A panel of judges in New York last month ruled that Trump's plan to exclude undocumented people from the #2020Census numbers used for apportionment was illegal under federal statutory law. That case is now on appeal to SCOTUS, scheduled for argument on Nov. 30.
Plus, a baseline to set real quick: It’s going to be exceedingly difficult for SCOTUS--or any court--to rule that what Trump wants to do is legal. And that's regardless of whether SCOTUS has 8 Justices or 9, or who the swing Justice is. Why?
So, if your main argument for the citizenship question is that we asked about citizenship before the 1960 Census, you’re relying on a completely flawed census paradigm.
(4) And if you’re relying on the appearance of citizenship questions on the sample surveys from 1970 onward as some kind of stamp of approval for their appearance on the 2020 head count form, you’re also on bad turf.
Citizenship questions have been confined strictly to the sample forms because the Bureau has long recognized that trying to assess everyone’s citizenship in times of hyper-xenophobic, anti-immigrant politics would destroy the count.
It's another day ending in "-day," so of course folks are spreading bad history to protect the #2020Census citizenship question. Claims that these questions have a deep history, etc. are misleading, where they’re not outright FALSE. Why? Stroll with me for a minute or two 👇