Tom Wolf Profile picture
16 Jan, 21 tweets, 7 min read
🚨 BREAKING CENSUS NEWS: The Trump administration pledges it will stand down on reporting #2020Census numbers—including, but not limited to, citizenship numbers—in a significant victory for our lawsuit challenging the rushed count. 🧵👇 @BrennanCenter
The “we”: the relentless coalition of @BrennanCenter @LawyersComm @lathamwatkins @NatUrbanLeague @LWV @BAJItweet @NAACP @CityAttorneyLA @sliccardo @Chicago @CountyofLA @GRIC_Official and the Navajo Nation, who have been fighting, 24/7, since the summer on this case.
The basic details…
The federal government has pledged in writing to a federal court that it will not release any census data—including citizenship data for apportionment or redistricting—during the remainder of Trump's term. @BrennanCenter
In exchange, we have agreed to a three-week pause in our case, which has been traveling quickly toward trial in March.
This pledge has been memorialized in a joint stipulation filed this evening in the federal court in the Northern District of California and accepted by Judge Koh.
What this means...
1. This ENDS any attempts to rush the count out before Trump leaves office and, by extension, to rush out numbers with undocumented people removed. Before today, the admin. had not expressly committed to this, only suggested the rush might be off.

Now, it is officially OFF.
2. The Census Bureau will have more time to work on the numbers before they are released, instead of facing an artificial deadline of completing the task before President Trump leaves office. This increases the likelihood of a full, fair, and accurate count.
3. The Presidential Memorandum to exclude undocumented people from the Count—which was in front of SCOTUS at the end of November—will NOT be implemented under Trump. This ensures that the count won't be illegally reduced, in violation of the Constitution and federal statutes.
(For more on the Exclusion Memo and how SCOTUS handled it: brennancenter.org/our-work/analy…)
4. This agreement is a next step, not the final step. Our case is on pause, not concluded.
We will continue to work to get all the time necessary to ensure that communities of color and other undercounted communities are fully counted and receive the political power and federal funding that the law guarantees them.
We will also continue to hold the federal government to the highest standard. And we’re looking ahead to the next steps in the case.
And, make no mistake, there have already been many steps in this case! We filed our complaint back in August. brennancenter.org/our-work/analy…
Within weeks we were winning and defending significant court orders extending counting to Oct. 15.
brennancenter.org/our-work/analy…
Only a late ruling from SCOTUS’s shadow docket stopped us from getting the full extension to Oct. 31 we sought.
nytimes.com/2020/10/13/us/…
Following that ruling, we pressed forward to ensure that the Bureau had enough time to process all the data it had collected.

We didn’t give up.

We worked harder.

Which brings us to today: the Trump administration will stop trying to rush the count. @BrennanCenter
Now, we look forward to finishing the job.
For more on this case as it develops, visit our frequently updated case page: brennancenter.org/our-work/court…
And for more on @BrennanCenter’s census project, visit our website: brennancenter.org/issues/gerryma…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Wolf

Tom Wolf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tomTMwolf

18 Dec 20
❗️BREAKING SCOTUS has announced it will take a wait-and-see approach to Trump’s proposal to manipulate the #2020Census results by excluding undocumented people. In short: Big gamble, wrong on the law, VERY bad policy.

Unpacking this new development in the 🧵👇 @BrennanCenter
The full Exclusion Memorandum Opinion is here: brennancenter.org/sites/default/…
Back in July, President Trump issued a Presidential Memorandum—known as the “Exclusion Memo”--stating that it would now be US policy to exclude undocumented people from the census head count used to divvy up seats in the US House. npr.org/2020/07/21/892…
Read 35 tweets
11 Dec 20
❗️CENSUS NEWS: A federal court has ordered the Trump administration to produce documents shedding light on the rushed close to the 2020 Census, granting our motion to compel production in our ongoing challenge. @BrennanCenter (short🧵👇)
Setting aside the technical discussion of the documents we should receive, the court's order very clearly explains the stakes of our case:
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct 20
BREAKING: Trump is trying to rush the #2020Census results out the door on Dec. 31, but we’re not going to let him.

This morning, we launched the next phase in our push to save the census. Read the full complaint here: brennancenter.org/sites/default/….

Details in the🧵👇 @BrennanCenter Image
Back in April, when the covid pandemic erupted across the country, the Census Bureau’s experts put forward a plan to ensure that everyone got counted AND stayed safe and healthy.
Read 16 tweets
22 Oct 20
Today's San Jose ruling that Trump can't exclude undocumented people from the #2020Census is smart. And not just because the panel got the issues right. It makes it MUCH harder for the Supreme Court to do the wrong thing and for Trump to worm out. Let's unpack it 🧵@BrennanCenter
Context: A panel of judges in New York last month ruled that Trump's plan to exclude undocumented people from the #2020Census numbers used for apportionment was illegal under federal statutory law. That case is now on appeal to SCOTUS, scheduled for argument on Nov. 30.
Plus, a baseline to set real quick: It’s going to be exceedingly difficult for SCOTUS--or any court--to rule that what Trump wants to do is legal. And that's regardless of whether SCOTUS has 8 Justices or 9, or who the swing Justice is. Why?
Read 14 tweets
12 Jun 19
So, if your main argument for the citizenship question is that we asked about citizenship before the 1960 Census, you’re relying on a completely flawed census paradigm.
(4) And if you’re relying on the appearance of citizenship questions on the sample surveys from 1970 onward as some kind of stamp of approval for their appearance on the 2020 head count form, you’re also on bad turf.
Citizenship questions have been confined strictly to the sample forms because the Bureau has long recognized that trying to assess everyone’s citizenship in times of hyper-xenophobic, anti-immigrant politics would destroy the count.
Read 5 tweets
12 Jun 19
It's another day ending in "-day," so of course folks are spreading bad history to protect the #2020Census citizenship question. Claims that these questions have a deep history, etc. are misleading, where they’re not outright FALSE. Why? Stroll with me for a minute or two 👇
First, the receipts
We’ve comprehensively and exhaustively dismantled the mythical history of citizenship questions in The Georgetown Law Journal (@GeorgetownLJ): georgetownlawjournal.org/articles/311/c…
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!