1/ Some people believe on Tuesday, the December quarter "earnings season" kicks into a higher gear.

Smart investors know this is actually the "free cash flow season" and their better investing outcomes reflect that realization.

Why the focus on earnings? People are lazy.
2/ Justifying your professional existence is hard. Early securities analysts had to find ways to convince customers they could predict which stocks would outperform others. They naturally were attracted to "earnings" due to a mental bias Charlie Munger calls "overcounting."
3/ Everyone knows the history of depreciation and why tax laws are focused on earnings. home.treasury.gov/system/files/1… The good news for everyone is that they can decide to invest based based on the metric which actually determines value (AKA, free cash flow). Differential advantage!
4/ Edge can come from informational, analytical or behavioral sources. Get:

1) better information

2) the same information sooner or

3) analyze that information differently in ways that lead to variant perceptions about an asset’s value.

Chasing the crowd = lousy outcomes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tren Griffin

Tren Griffin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @trengriffin

14 Jan
How exactly are all "seed and angel" rounds included in this chart when public filings aren't always available to scrape to generate this number?

Maybe there should be an asterisk which states: "That we know of"? news.crunchbase.com/news/global-20…
"The total number of early stage deals in the US decreased for the second year in a row, sinking to 6,022" claims this report: straitstimes.com/business/start…
Wait! This number is not like the other! It's lower. And the previous report says global. Maybe some definitions and notes about methods would, you know, be helpful. Just a thought. news.crunchbase.com/news/global-20…
Read 5 tweets
12 Jan
1/ The new Howard Marks memo contains this reference: mastersinvest.com/newblog/2020/1…

"Applying the mental model of ‘mean reversion’ for a ‘fade-defying’ business model will lead to an erroneous conclusion. If the mental models are wrong, the spreadsheet model will be wrong. Period."
2/ "The onslaught of startups with readily available capital and minimal barriers to scaling means that the durability of legacy businesses has never been more vulnerable or uncertain.' Howard Marks in today's memo.

"Fight the Fade." #SanteFeInstitute

mastersinvest.com/newblog/2020/1…
3/ “Competitive advantage period (CAP) is how long returns above the cost of capital will be earned. CAP is similar in concept to 'fade rate.'”

Michael Mauboussin, Chair of the Santa Fe Institute's Board of Trustees people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfil…
Read 6 tweets
12 Jan
1/ This Howard Marks memo describes why I am a "Charlie Munger investor" and why the term "value investor" is dead for me. oaktreecapital.com/insights/howar…

"There is no such thing as value and growth investing.” Buffett

"Dividing it up into 'value' and 'growth' is twaddle." Munger
2/ "Value can be found in many forms. The fact that a company grows rapidly, relies on intangibles such as technology for its success and/or has a high p/e ratio shouldn’t mean it can’t be invested in on the basis of intrinsic value." Howard Marks
3/ If a genie asked me what meeting I would have liked to attended as a fly on the table, very high on the list would be one of the breakfasts where Charlie Munger and Howard Marks exchanged ideas. Here's some of the memo I cited in the first tweet:
Read 5 tweets
10 Jan
Can you guess who this is?

Clue: He worked on capital hill for a US senator who was President Pro Tem of the Senate, Chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee and who was third in the line of succession to be US President. Image
What was Bill Gates doing in 1978 when I was doing this? He was working in New Mexico (the move to Washington state happened on January 1, 1979).

Microsoft had 1978 year end sales of $1 million and famously it had 13 employees. The third language product COBOL shipped in June.
We were both born in 1955. That was a lucky birth year since we were too young for the Vietnam draft and too old to be ruined by disco music.

Microprocessors, which arrived when we were attending high school, would create huge opportunities for our birth cohort. Big tailwind.
Read 6 tweets
10 Jan
1/ Lazaridis was on his treadmill watching TV when he first saw the iPhone in early 2007. He said inside Blackberry:: "If that thing catches on, we're competing with a Mac, not a Nokia. How did they get AT&T to allow [that]? It'll collapse the network.'' theglobeandmail.com/report-on-busi…
2/ "iPhone broke all the rules. The operating system alone took up 700 megabytes of memory and the device used two processors. The entire BlackBerry ran on one processor and used 32 MB. Unlike the BlackBerry, the iPhone had an Internet-capable browser." 25iq.com/2017/02/24/why…
3/ I've been involved in cellular since the first Seattle system was turned on in December of 1984. That system was just eleven cell sites all on tall buildings and big towers. There was A/B roaming for almost a year. I used a Motorola DynaTac 8000X, which is now in a museum. Image
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
1/ When I think about a particular decision that relates to Covid, I try hard to think like Richard Zeckhauser. Pretending that all you face is risk, rather than uncertainty and ignorance, is dangerous. Probabilities and future states are not always known.
google.com/amp/s/25iq.com…
2/ Charlie Munger: “The right way to think is the way [Harvard Professor Richard] Zeckhauser plays bridge. It’s just that simple.” “Smart people make these terrible boners. …Well maybe a great bridge player like Zeckhauser [doesn’t], but that’s a trained response." Image
3/ Risk is when probabilities are well defined. It is much less important than uncertainty.

Uncertainty, not risk, is most regularly before us: we can identify the states of the world, but not their probabilities.

Ignorance is when some potential states cannot be identified. Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!