🚨While we were focused on the insurrection, SCOTUS quietly took a case that it had been holding for some time: AFPF v. Becerra.
AFPF is a Charles Koch opaque front LLC.
The GOP was happy to pass the bill to ban anonymous shell co’s.
Is this a back door?
h/t @JannusWilhelmus
AFPF is a Charles Koch opaque front LLC.
The GOP was happy to pass the bill to ban anonymous shell co’s.
Is this a back door?
h/t @JannusWilhelmus
https://twitter.com/senwhitehouse/status/1348293518758973442
If this seems far-fetched, consider the way the Supreme Court has ruled in *all* of its 80 cases where there was a 5-4 split decision.
It ruled in the interests of Republican donors - like Charles Koch - every time.
And the Kochs spent millions to promote Kavanaugh and Barrett.
It ruled in the interests of Republican donors - like Charles Koch - every time.
And the Kochs spent millions to promote Kavanaugh and Barrett.
https://twitter.com/clearing_fog/status/1315352225720410112
And if you are not familiar with the “dark money” concept, or think that it isn’t as bad as it has been made out to be, please do yourself a favor and watch Sheldon Whitehouse’s presentation during the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation hearings.
https://twitter.com/clearing_fog/status/1316089774575288320
Oct 12, 2020, NYTimes:
“Charles Koch has activated his political network to support Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination, and to tip the scales on her nomination battle in the U.S. Senate.”
“Charles Koch has activated his political network to support Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination, and to tip the scales on her nomination battle in the U.S. Senate.”
https://twitter.com/clearing_fog/status/1315751572077375488
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
