✨NEW BLOG✨

@DanielGover & @james_lisak review the development of the hybrid Commons during 2020 - arguing that remote voting must now be restored, & that these events reveal the problems of government control over the Commons agenda

Summary 🧵👇 1/8

constitution-unit.com/2021/01/17/the…
Last spring, the Commons adapted quickly to the challenges of the pandemic. Hybrid arrangements for select committees & Commons debates, & online remote voting, were all in place by mid-May - a major achievement by Commons staff.

2/8
But in May the government simply allowed those arrangements to lapse, despite anger from opposition & backbench MPs.

It would take until 30/12 - when the government wanted MPs to debate its Brexit deal legislation - for full virtual participation in debates to be restored.

3/8
MPs & @CommonsProcCom called repeatedly for the extension of virtual participation during this period. But the govt ignored their calls

Some key debates which did take place were scheduled (by govt) in ways that probably affected the outcome. E.g. 👇
4/8
As a result, some MPs were excluded from debates on bills & motions for more than half of last year - their & their constituents’ voices were lost.

This was a clear violation of a core parliamentary principle: that all members should be able to participate.

5/8
Meanwhile, remote online voting still hasn’t been restored - again, despite calls from MPs & @CommonsProcCom

Instead, the proxy voting system has been massively expanded - to 572/650 MPs by 30/12. Whips hold 90%+ of those votes.

6/8
How did this happen? The Commons agenda is heavily controlled by the government - the govt can often simply prevent MPs from debating things.

There were various points last year where the hybrid Commons might have developed differently, had MPs been more able to act.

7/8
Giving MPs a say on restoring remote voting is an immediate priority

But these events also demonstrate the problems of govt agenda control - something the Commons should now revisit

For more on this topic, look out for a major new @ConUnit_UCL report, launching Tuesday 👀

8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Constitution Unit

Constitution Unit Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ConUnit_UCL

22 Dec 20
Statement from Unit Director Professor Meg Russell on the 16 new appointments to the House of Lords announced today.

"It is hard not to see the Prime Minister’s latest round of peerage appointments as anything less than outrageous"

1 of 3
It's 3 days before (what's left of) Christmas, so there will be no full analysis now.

But to see the effects of today's peerage announcements just add 16 (7 Con, 5 Lab, 4 Crossbench) to the details below. The rest of the analysis still stands.

2 of 3

constitution-unit.com/2020/07/31/bor…
The added problem with today's appointments beyond general unfettered patronage is the flouting of HOLAC's propriety recommendations.

That is openly admitted on the Downing Street website, here: gov.uk/government/new…

3 of 3
Read 4 tweets
20 Dec 20
A growing chorus of Conservative MPs is demanding a recall of parliament to discuss yesterday's lockdown announcements.

They are right. Such major decisions need parliamentary scrutiny. Indeed government has promised as much.

But there are two problems.
politicshome.com/news/article/m…
The first big problem is that only ministers can recall parliament, so can block MPs' request.

This is plainly absurd, given government is accountable to parliament.

There have long been calls for reform, as Meg Russell & @DanielGover discussed here:

constitution-unit.com/2019/07/23/pre…
The second problem is that with parliament in tier 4, travel and gatherings are ill-advised.

In theory MPs could participate & vote virtually. But this has been consistently blocked by... the government.

Despite warnings, there are no contingency plans.

Read 13 tweets
26 Nov 20
1/

NEW REPORT

Following 14 months of research, deliberation, interviews and consultation, the Working Group on Unification Referendums on the Island of Ireland launches its interim report.

Report: bit.ly/3nWfRiC

Here is the report distilled into a summary thread 👇
2/

What’s the report about?🤔

It explores how any future referendum on Northern Ireland’s constitutional status would best be designed and conducted.

The Group is neutral on whether a unification referendum should be held & on what the outcome should be.
3/

What is the Working Group?

The Group comprises researchers at universities in Belfast, Dublin, London, & USA, chaired by Unit Deputy Director @alanjrenwick

It is independent of both governments and all political parties.

Alan explains more in this 📹
Read 15 tweets
25 Nov 20
1/

📢NEW EVENT SERIES 📢

To launch the Working Group on Unification Referendums on the Island of Ireland’s interim report the Group is convening a series of webinars.

The webinars are an opportunity for discussion of the report’s purposes, analysis, and conclusions

Details👇
2/

The Unit is hosting one of the webinars

3 December @ 1pm

Chair of the group @alanjrenwick will be joined on the panel with Working Group member Alan Whysall, former senior civil servant Clare Salters & @martinkettle

Chair: Meg Russell

Book: bit.ly/2HDNyGa
3/

The Unit is co-hosting a webinar with partners @TriCONDublin @tcddublin and @ucddublin for audiences in the Republic of Ireland on 1 December.

Sign up here: bit.ly/3fAc0EE
Read 4 tweets
24 Nov 20
This looks bad. Government using its control of the Commons agenda to manipulate debate on whether MPs can participate virtually in proceedings during the pandemic.

Which is surely, if anything is, a matter that MPs themselves should be able properly and fairly to decide.
A reminder that the government has form on this.

This open letter to Jacob Rees-Mogg was sent in June by a group of democracy experts including @RuthFox01 @McEwen_Nicola @Smith1966G @estrangeirada @TimJHughes and @anthonyzach

constitution-unit.com/2020/06/08/end…
Oddly, this fails to mention Conservative @CommonsProcCom chair Karen Bradley, & the Conservative co-sponsor of @RhonddaBryant's amendment, & that they all supported that amendment in order to open up virtual participation to a larger number of excluded MPs but JRM blocked it.
Read 4 tweets
24 Nov 20
🚨EVENT: 'Reforming the House of Lords'🚨

Unit Director Meg Russell is joined on the panel by @Tanni_GT and @LordNortonLouth for what looks like will be a fascinating discussion on the House of Lords and reform @MileEndInst

Today at 12🕛

Sign up: us02web.zoom.us/webinar/regist…
Meg explains that debates on Lords reform have long been a feature of British politics. Going back as far as 1911 there have been incremental reforms to the chamber.

One of the more recent changes occurred in 2014 which allowed peers to retire. Image
Meg reminds us that debates concerning reform of the function and role of the second chamber is not unique to the UK.

Neither is the view that the second chamber is undemocratic, nor the failure to agree on reform.

So, what makes reform tricky?
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!