It's no surprise that Joe Biden plans to begin his administration with a flurry of executive actions—that's what presidents tend to do as leaders of the Executive Branch.
"Executive action" isn't the same as "executive fiat" or "executive overreach." 1/
In the end, "executive overreach" is whatever the courts find to be outside the authorities granted to the Executive Branch by Congress or the Constitution.
But in the beginning, as a policy takes shape, you could say that executive overreach is a state of mind.
2/
Under Obama, executive actions went through layers & layers of scrutiny from gov't lawyers before they were initiated.
It wasn't just fear of losing in court—officials wanted to stay on the lawful side of statute & judicial precedent.
Expect the same from Team Biden.
3/
Under Trump, "lawful executive action" was redefined to mean "whatever we want to do & let's hope 5 Supreme Court justices ultimately agree."
From the very first week, policies flew out the door with minimal-to-zero internal legal scrutiny.
Howls about "executive overreach" will soon pour forth from Joe Biden's opponents. You can set your watch by it.
But the lawyerly policymaking process under Biden will be nothing like the nihilistic power plays under Trump.
5/
(Speaking of lawyerly, here's a rundown of executive orders vs. presidential memoranda vs. regulations vs. all kinds of other stuff commonly lumped together as "executive actions," focusing on immigration policy. Enjoy?)
Joe Biden will present Congress with an immigration reform bill on his first day in office—Wednesday!—including a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, immediate green cards for DACA & TPS holders, & more...
Legal immigration items newly reported:
*Recapturing unused green cards
*Work permits for spouses & children of H-1B workers
Prior promises by candidate Biden:
* No green card caps for STEM PhD grads
* No caps on spouses & children of permanent residents
* No country caps
2/
Lots to anticipate starting on Jan. 20—not only these legislative proposals that Congress will still need to pass, but also a great many new executive actions to start rebuilding our immigration system in the meantime.
3/3
If Dems control the Senate, then the Congressional Review Act (CRA) suddenly snaps into major relevance as a blunt instrument to eliminate Trump-era rules—at least from the past 6 months or so.
The CRA lets Congress take a simple majority vote on eliminating most any rule from the past 60 "days of continuous session"—when you include recess days, that ends up being several months.
The CRA is a two-way bazooka: It destroys the existing rule *&* in the future prevents the agency from issuing a "new rule that is substantially the same" or reissuing the rule in "substantially the same form."
Here's an error worthy of Encyclopedia Brown: The Federalist Papers came *after* the Constitution was written, so this shouldn't be an acceptable answer.
2/
Name 3 "rights of everyone living in the United States"—but don't sweat anything after the 1st & 2nd amendments, like, say, equal protection or due process.
Can you imagine the uproar if a Democratic administration put forward a list of rights & left out the 2nd amendment?
🚨DHS just changed the policy manual for @USCIS officers, making it much more difficult & confusing to get a green card (and ultimately US citizenship).
Let's dive into what is changing, & then why this is happening now...