1/16

It is a little frustrating to see the response many analysts had to the GDP growth data Chinese released today. These numbers aren’t especially good, and they certainly shouldn’t have been surprising. Back in April and May, when most analysts...

reut.rs/3bMWOEm
2/16

were projecting negative or barely positive GDP growth for China in 2020 (the OECD, for example, expected China’s GDP to contract by 3.7%), I insisted that GDP growth for 2020 would be positive, and probably between 2% and 3%.

Today, it was reported as 2.3%. How did...
3/16

I know? Because I knew that while most of the healthy sources of Chinese growth would contract (except for exports, which would expand given Beijing’s intense supply-side response to the impact of Covid-19), Beijing was going to respond to a significant...
4/16

worsening of the healthy parts of its economy by unleashing enough of the unhealthy, non-productive growth it has long tried to constrain – basically real estate and infrastructure investment – in order to achieve as much economic activity as it...
5/16

needed for domestic political ends.

And that’s exactly what happened. While GDP grew by 6.5% in the fourth quarter, even with substantial tailwinds its retail sales measure – a proxy for consumption – was only up 4.6%, and it was down 3.9% overall in 2020.
6/16

That is pretty bad. Not only did the imbalances get worse in 2020, in other words, they even got worse in the fourth quarter, when we were expecting a partial consumption rebound.

Put differently, the consumption share of China’s GDP will have probably dropped...
7/16

by 3-4 percentage points this year, driving it almost back to its nadir in 2010-11. There is no way that this can be seen as good news, and is confirmed by the fact that while exports were up 3.6% in 2020, imports were down 1.1%. By the way those who say China’s trade...
8/16

surplus soared because Chinese factories opened first simply do not understand how the balance of payments work. The main way exports could have expanded while imports contracted is if the share workers retained of GDP contracted, and this is what happened. For all the...
9/16

promise that “external circulation” would be used to shift the Chinese economy towards “internal circulation”, what actually happened was a huge shift from internal to external circulation.

That isn't what anyone wanted, and the fact that more than 100% of...
10/16

China’s “recovery” was driven by supply-side measures, and that the economy is now more unbalanced than ever, has, of course, two important implications. First, China’s debt burden must worsen significantly, and of course it did in 2020, with China’s debt-to-GDP ratio...
11/16

rising by 25 percentage points, roughly 3-4 times its previous year’s increase. Second, that its trade surplus must soar, putting huge pressure on the rest of the world, and of course that happened too.

This means that China must reverse the consequence of 2020 as...
12/16

quickly as possible. We will probably see some partial reversal this year: consumption growth – along with the associated growth in business investment – should account for most if not all GDP growth this year. This will depend on whether Beijing is satisfied...
13/16

with 6-7% GDP growth or whether the authorities will demand more. If the former, the debt ratio should remain flat.

But without a serious – and politically difficult – push by Beijing, it isn’t clear that household income growth will even keep up with GDP growth...
14/16

in 2021, and it must sharply exceed GDP growth simply to return China to the unbalanced position from which it ended 2019. I think analysts should stop focusing on China’s GDP growth rate as if it could tell us about how well the Chinese economy performed in 2020.
15/16

It performed badly, like the rest of the world, and it is only because Beijing sharply increased all the things it has been trying to rein in that the GDP measure was able to rise. That’s like saying that if I can run faster after smoking a big bowl of crystal...
16/16

meth, it means I am healthier than I thought. To say that China was the only major economy to grow in 2020, in other words, is only to say that we are unable to distinguish between GDP and the economy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

20 Jan
1/6

Debt does matter, as Sharma argues here, but it matters because balance sheet structures matter. Fragile balance sheets limit operational flexibility, increase uncertainty, exacerbate volatility, and set off a wide range of financial distress costs.

ft.com/content/d49b53…
2/6

But the impact that government deficits have on the balance sheet isn't simply to increase debt and financial fragility. Its impact depends partially on the structure of the debt and mainly on what the debt is used for. To the extent that debt is used to fund activity...
3/6

that boosts real debt-servicing capacity, more debt can actually strengthen the balance sheet.

If the Biden administration funds the rebuilding of necessary infrastructure, in other words, or funds income transfers that strengthen domestic demand, the consequent fiscal...
Read 6 tweets
19 Jan
1/6

Good article on the real meaning of Chinese GDP growth figures. The article correctly points out that income inequality in China is extremely high, comparable to levels in the most unequal developing economies, and of course higher than in the...

bloomberg.com/markets/fixed-…
2/6

developed economies. It also points out that Beijing, like the rest of the world, recognizes this to be a serious problem and for years has pledged to redress it – so far unsuccessfully, also like the rest of the world.
3/6

But I would add that in fact China has two types of income inequality, which is why its consumption imbalance is so much more difficult to resolve. Not only do ordinary Chinese have too low a share of total household income but, what is worse, household income is...
Read 6 tweets
17 Jan
1/5

The first of these two articles – both published last week in SCMP – suggests that the PBoC wants to tighten credit and stabilize the debt burden, even if that means restraining GDP growth, while the second cites a senior PBoC official who...

scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/5

assures us that the PBoC will remain accommodative to "maintain necessary support for economic recovery", which Beijing seems to define as many years of at least 5% growth.

It seems every week we get the same conflicting signals from...

scmp.com/economy/china-…
3/5

the PBoC, in which at one time they prioritize financial stability and at another they promise economic stability. While these can in theory be compatible aims, I am pretty sure that the PBoC knows that growth in China can only be maintained with a rapid rise in debt.
Read 5 tweets
16 Jan
1/14

While I've long argued that the Trump administration’s approach to trade did more economic harm than good, I read the USCBC research report and I am very skeptical about its methodology. It seems to consist mainly of measuring the positive...

reut.rs/3spPO6d
2/14

impact on direct employment of each component of trade, while ignoring the indirect components. This is a problem when most of both the positive and negative impacts of trade are mainly indirect, affecting the economy primarily in the way they...

uschina.org/reports/us-chi…
3/14

change investment and/or savings in the economy, and yet these show up nowhere.

For example their analysis would not be able to distinguish between the employment impact of tariffs on the deficits the US ran in the 19th Century, when foreign capital inflows boosted US...
Read 14 tweets
15 Jan
1/5

An important point over which Chen Yulu is right to worry. The US-China trade relationship is a kind of machine that converts US consumption into Chinese savings, which in turn are likely to fuel more liquidity bubbles and speculative capital flows.

scmp.com/economy/global…
2/5

This wouldn't be the first time something like this will have happened. The three biggest trade surpluses of the past 100 years were the American surplus of the 1920s, the Japanese surplus of the 1980s, and China's more recently. I don't think it is at all a...
3/5

coincidence that the first two were associated with devastating asset bubbles, mainly in the surplus countries but also to a lesser extent in the big deficit countries.

The mechanism is complex, but there is likely to be a big difference between China's allowing inflows...
Read 5 tweets
15 Jan
1/4

According to this article, "The private sector is likely to increasingly take the lead from the public sector in spurring China’s economic growth. Infrastructure investment was a key driver of China’s growth last year, supported by strong fiscal...

scmp.com/comment/opinio…
2/4

stimulus. But increasingly, private-sector consumption and investment will play a more important role."

I think it would be far more accurate to say that the private sector is only temporarily likely to take the lead from the public sector as we see a partial reversal of...
3/4

the huge relative increase in the role of the public sector in 2020 (accounting, along with real estate development, for more than 100% of last year's GDP growth). This will happen mainly because, as the article notes, consumers will probably spend some of last year's...
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!