As a political journalist there are such immensely interesting (& terrifying!) stories out there, from the interface of technology & politics, to climate change, an epochal social upheaval & rise of China.
This is all more important, & interesting, than whining about Twitter.
Does anyone really think it adds value to their audience to constantly whine about people they don’t like? Does anyone think people will want to pay for that?
I don’t agree with them on much but you have to appreciate quality press that doesn’t do this like the Economist & FT.
For me this explains the success of Monocle magazine since 2008. It’s overpriced and the articles often aren’t anything special but you read it and see people doing interesting things all across the world. You put it down feeling refreshed and optimistic.
Compare this to what is the default for quite a few people in politics and media who seem to increasingly focus on their own use of social media as something of huge importance. It isn’t. As a journalist you are a conduit for things that effect millions. This is also interesting.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Labour won't back the NEU and won't offer anything which differs from the Tories.
That's been Starmer's plan since he became leader, & everything is mood music until 2024. This isn't dithering, it's the plan.
Will it work? Who knows. But for now there isn't an opposition.
The model here is the Tories in opposition during the global financial crisis. But the difference is that unlike now Labour actually dealt with that. The equivalent would have been Brown allowing complete economic meltdown and opposition shrugging soldiers.
It's particularly odd seeing Starmer supporters like @paulmasonnews outlining smart, radical and necessary policies in response to the next few months ahead.
Labour won't adopt any of them. Again, Paul, that *is* the project for Starmer until 2024. He's been very open about it.
As Britain looks set to re-open schools after 4 consecutive days of 50,000 positive tests for Covid, let's recall that Vietnam closed schools on Jan 31st 2020 - and kept them shut for more than 3 months - when the country had 5 confirmed cases.
Since then they've had 35 deaths.
Vietnam has done nothing exceptional: it quarantined all visitors and anyone who contacted a Covid case in state centres, it closed schools, and it unrolled a huge test and trade system quickly.
This year they are posting GDP growth while UK GDP sinks 10%. Let's learn from them.
And I know its hard for anglo-exceptionalists to accept but Oxford professor's data tally with the Vietnamese government. They, like others in east asia, nailed it where we brutally failed.
In suspending @jeremycorbyn the Labour leadership defied the EHRC’s *key recommendation* within minutes of saying they would implement all of the report.
David Evans & @Keir_Starmer have questions to answer.
Here Starmer says the decision was made by the general secretary, but implicitly includes himself as well.
What is more the fact multiple MPs, including Tom Watson, appear to have encouraged Corbyn to act unlawfully (according to EHRC) has not been mentioned. Why?
As with Starmer & Evans now, political interference appears to be fine for media, as long as right people are doing it.
This 2018 picture from Congressman Bill Pascrell says a thousand words.
Despite having a median age of 38, & being one of the youngest countries in the OECD, America’s politicians are getting older while Europe’s get younger.
Senate president pro tempore, Charles Grassley, runs the Senate Finance Committee at 87. Jim Inhofe, chairman of the Armed Services Committee, is 85. Chairman of the Appropriations Committee, Richard Shelby, is 86. Dianne Feinstein is 87.
“Our investigation found that the Labour Party breached the Equality Act 2010 by committing unlawful harassment through the acts of its agents in *two* of the complaints we investigated.”
Two too many, of course but still...two. It continues:
“These included using antisemitic tropes & suggesting that complaints of antisemitism were fake or smears. As these people were acting as agents of the Labour Party, Labour was legally responsible for their conduct.”
It goes on” A further 18 ‘borderline’ cases. In these cases, there was not enough evidence to conclude that the Labour Party was legally responsible for the conduct of the individual. These were people such as local councillors, local candidates &...” >
After declaring the climate crisis is a threat to most life on Earth David Attenborough said disruptive protest was unacceptable and that the answer is individuals using less.
The disconnect between analysis & prescription couldn’t be more irrational.
This isn’t a remotely serious response. Two degrees is likely already locked in, mostly as a result of CO2 already emitted. We are living amid the 6th great extinction & immense change is on the way.
A lot of this boils down to the idea that ‘cultural change’ is the decisive factor in change happening, it isn’t.
The factory acts, the abolition of slavery, civil rights and so on had to be legislated for. They also needed a measure of coercion - the state.