No speculation is needed. Those who wield power are demanding it. The only question is how much opposition they will encounter.
The more honest proponents of this new domestic War on Terror are explicitly admitting that they want to model it on the first one.
Continuing to process Washington debates of this sort primarily through the prism of “Democrat v. Republican” or even “left v. right” is a sure ticket to the destruction of core rights.
This isn't a leftist or conservative tactic but a ruling class tactic: to quash all dissent.
This New War on Terror is domestic in name from the start and carries the explicit purpose of fighting “extremists” and “domestic terrorists” among American citizens on U.S. soil, and thus presents the whole slew of historically familiar dangers.
This is so important and fantastic to see, @RashidaTlaib: real leadership. Congrats to you and the other progressive members who signed this important letter.
A left-wing wall against a new War on Terror, in alliance with right-wing members to block it, would be spectacular:
An alliance of the most left-wing members of the Congress (the Squad and others) standing unified with right-wing members in defense of civil liberties — blocking a new War on Terror from Adam Schiff, Liz Cheney, CIA/FBI & friends — is like political ecstacy to me.
Pinning this letter to my wall:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Is an American citizen now deemed by Democrats of suspect loyalties if they have a Russian spouse? The reason Parler is using a Russian service is because DEMS FORCED Apple, Amazon & Google to cut them off - now want to investigate them for it:
Here's the letter of @RepMaloney -- Chair of the powerful House Oversight -- demanding the FBI investigate a US citizen, the founder of Parler, for ties to Russia, citing - among other things - that his wife is Russian.
Two key points I want to flag about these interviews on the threatened Domestic War on Terror. But first: please watch this short clip of Obama's former CIA Director and drone-killer guru describing with great glee how he envisions this war and who is targeted (via @tomselliott):
The first key point: none of this requires speculation. Those who now wield power -- establishment Dems, neocons, security state ghouls and their media allies in you-know-which-outlets -- are explicitly saying they want the New War on Terror to copy the first one, but in the US:
"The commentary from TV broadcasters across the board, all day long, was at times embarrassingly complimentary" -- The Washington Post's @Sulliview, with great understatement on yesterday's festivities and how the media covered them.
Sullivan adds it's understandable, but media dangers with Biden are clear:
"We run the risk of being seduced by an administration that, in many cases, closely reflects our values: multiculturalism, a belief in the principles of liberal democracy, and a kind of wonky idealism. "
In extremely related news, a new poll today finds "Trust in traditional media has declined to an all-time low....For the first time ever, fewer than half of all Americans have trust in traditional media."
Censorship never was a left-wing tactic. Opposing censorship was never the hallmark of right-wing values. And censorship is never aimed at one ideology or the other, but at *dissent* from the ruling class wherever it comes from.
Listen to Noam Chomsky:
Read how Chomsky, in 1981, object to the attempts to have a tenured professor in France fired for Holocaust revisionism, because Chomsky knew that that framework, once implanted, would be used against people like him, Edward Said, Howard Zinn, etc.:
Here's the ACLU today explaining why it's so proud of its decision in 1977 to represent a neo-Nazi group's right to march through Skokie, Illinois, a town filled with Holocaust survivors.
Keep telling me "Liberals' 9/11 and War on Terror" is hyperbole and I'll keep posting tweets like this one, from the still-embittered Dem colonel who lost to Madison Cawthorn, explicitly comparing him to GITMO detainees, calling him a "terrorist," and urging a "war on sedition":
Do you think if establishment Dems join with people like Liz Cheney & Mitt Romney to launch a domestic War on Terror -- new anti-terrorism bills, new FBI surveillance & infiltration powers, more internet censorship -- that most of the left would support or oppose it? Don't know.
"Hoover started amassing secret intelligence on 'enemies of the US' — a list that included terrorists, communists, spies — or anyone Hoover or the FBI had deemed subversive." It
"led to FBI's secret intelligence ops against anyone deemed 'subversive.'"
"Anti-war protesters and civil rights leaders were added to Hoover's list...These people were enemies of the state, and in particular MLK was an enemy of the state. And Hoover aimed to watch over them."
As you root for and help the FBI, guess who its DC HQ is still named after?
In one of MLK's greatest speeches - on why the fight against racism can't be separated from anti-imperialism - he called the USG "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today."
No domestic progress possible, he said, without ending US militarism: