The real story of QAnon starts almost exactly one year before Q's first "drop" on 4 Chan. In late October 2016, Steve Pieczenik, former PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE EXPERT with the CIA and the State Department, put out a You Tube video in which he claimed...
...of having launched a "countercoup" against Hillary and Bill Clinton with the help of a secret group in intelligence and the military to prevent the Clintons from stealing the 2016 election. Pieczenik described how his group was allied with JULIAN ASSANGE to use the DNC...
..and Podesta emails to foil this plot by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

This story is a variant of two opposing stories in the saga of the 2016 election that dominated news and politics for the past 4 years--The QAnon story and the Trump-Russia-Wikileaks story...
...that claims Russian spies stole the DNC emails to help elect Trump, which is the fascinating part about this whole phenomenon. Check out these videos below to see what I mean:
Pieczenik announces his countercoup:

INFOWARS commences its promotion of the Pieczenik claims:

Infowars had a huge following while it was on You Tube which brought the Pieczenik claims to that large audience. By early 2017, the position of Infowars was that the Democratic Party was completely defeated and no longer had any ability to resist Trump's administration.
Long January 3, 2017 interview. Comments about Democratic Party being "irrelevant" in first half hour.

In late 2017, Mueller filed his first indictment in the Trump-Russia-Wikileaks "investigation." This contradicted Pieczenik's position that Mueller and the Democratic Party were impotent and no threats to Trump. This posed a problem for the Pieczenik narrative of countercoup.
Enter QAnon--Q takes Pieczenik's place as head of a secret group in intelligence and the military working against The Cabal. The prediction is Q's group, in alliance with Trump, will bring down The Cabal in what is called "The Storm."
Early Pieczenik interviews on Infowars of November-December 2016 claimed "The Storm" was Pieczenik's countercoup, but that already happened. There is now a need for such a movement with a FUTURE payoff. That became "The Storm" borrowing from David Wilcock and...
...Benjamin Fulford's predictions. During early 2018, JEROME CORSI, then running Infowars' Washington, DC desk, starts his own QAnon You Tube channel, as Infowars embraces Q as an intelligence source, contradicting Pieczenik's claims of "The Storm" happening in 2016.
Since Mueller's investigation actually had teeth, making it impossible to keep claiming Pieczenik's countercoup of 2016 made the world safe from The Cabal, changes had to be made that sent Pieczenik's countercoup down the memory hole. That is Q's purpose...
...Q replaces Pieczenik. The 2016 countercoup is replaced by THE STORM, which has not yet happened, so the world is still imperiled by The Cabal, not already rescued as Pieczenik told us in 2016. Simple cut-and-paste.
With Q becoming part of Infowars with the efforts of Corsi, the large Infowars audience feeds into the You Tube channels and blogs featuring Q's cryptic posts on 4Chan, and later, 8Chan. That this pivot actually worked without anyone wondering what happened to...
..the 2016 Pieczenik countercoup is testimony to the public's lack of concentration and critical thinking. The links to both are simply not deniable. The legend, an intelligence term for a false biography, of Q as countercoup leader exactly copies Pieczenik's.
The public is not the only one that had trouble keeping it all straight. In a July 2018 interview on Owen Shryoer's Infowar's show, Pieczenik corrected Shroyer when Shroyer predicted that THE STORM "was coming." Pieczenik said it already happened, meaning the countercoup.
The supreme irony in all of this is that not only does the legend of Q flow from the Pieczenik claims of the countercoup, but Trump-Russia-Wikileaks, the conspiracy theory of the LEFT, also flows from the Pieczenik countercoup.
In the above videos, we hear Steve Pieczenik claim that Julian Assange, using the DNC and Podesta emails, made the countercoup against Hillary in the 2016 election possible. This makes me wonder if both the RIGHT and LEFT sides of this conflict both originated...
...from the same source, and have been nurtured from that same source.

That is scary territory.
I had to get this from The Wayback Machine because it is no longer on the Internet:

web.archive.org/web/2017072116…
As you read the above article from the archived June 4, 2017 Infowars Web site, this is the source of the 2017-2018 editorial position at Infowars that there was nothing on the horizon that could possibly disturb the Trump Administration.
In 2017, Infowars echoed Steve Pieczenik in telling their audience that the Democratic Party was spent, a political empty husk that could do nothing to stop Trump. In 2018, The Storm was on the way thanks to QAnon.
Then the Mid-Term elections took place. Suddenly, Pro-Trump people weren't "in the streets of Berlin" near victory over The Cabal, but were slugging it our in the hedgerows of Normandy, stuck in the beachhead lodgement. Alex Jones knows what I mean.
@threadreaderapp I need an unroll, please. I accidentally deleted this one once before!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Guy Jordan

Guy Jordan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Farrier105

25 Dec 20
@franifio How did Putin get Trump nominated? Trump had to get nominated for Putin to get him elected. Your answer must include evidence, including documents, testimony, and other forms of evidence as defined in the Federal Code of Criminal Procedure, The Rules of Evidence.
@franifio I have the answer to how Trump got nominated, and the evidence, which is considerable. Putin had nothing to do with it.
@franifio Here we go---First, Hillary asked her friends in the media to "elevate" Trump as she wanted to run against him.

medium.com/@bjcampbell/th…

observer.com/2016/10/wikile…
Read 13 tweets
8 Nov 20
@RichHiggins_DC Total Votes by Position, GOP and Democrat

Congress: GOP Democrat Totals
257,487 182,632 440,119

President 257,005 275,293 532,298

Difference 482 -92,661 -92,179

Drill down:
@RichHiggins_DC The problem is there are votes just for President totaling 92,179 as opposed to the candidates for Member of Congress (MC). If the Democrat candidate for MC and the GOP for MC had split the difference, there wouldn't be an issue.
@RichHiggins_DC This reflects electronic votes or paper ballots with votes only for President, and not for MC. Those votes went to Biden. That is clear by the numbers. This needs explained. See, if votes went to the MC candidates in that quantity, that would cover it. These votes only...
Read 8 tweets
6 Nov 20
@MariaBartiromo The system used in Arizona's voting sounds a lot like the one we used in Venango County, Pennsylvania. If the ballot is good, and you removed your ballot stub, the votes are scanned in and the ballot is RETAINED by the machine.
This means you have an electronic tabulation of each individual vote, which is likely tagged by ballot number, mine was 15. You have controls like total votes by candidate, total votes for all candidates (hash totals) that can be matched by the darkened circles on the ballots.
The number of each ballot is also tagged to the voter's name, which means in a recount, your vote might no longer be secret, but anyone auditing the results could have the option of contacting voters directly to ask about ballot numbers and if they voted at all.
Read 5 tweets
3 Nov 20
@Beer_Parade @JimStarkey16 @Barnes_Law Looks like Q was bowing out anyway regardless of who would win the election.
@Beer_Parade @JimStarkey16 @Barnes_Law The point I tried to make in my earlier post to @Barnes_Law was that it was significant that the Q channels were deplatformed by You Tube just before the election. My reasoning was that the whole Q Legend does not work without Trump as President.
@Beer_Parade @JimStarkey16 @Barnes_Law As the Legend (which is intelligence speak for false biography to provide a cover to an operative) of Q goes, Q heads up a secret group in intel and military working with Trump to apprehend (during "The Storm") the cabal trying to take over the world.
Read 12 tweets
31 Oct 20
@ai_jared I tried using a timeline to suggest what probably happened after the Mid-Term elections. I forgot to include Trump's decision to not declassify Trump-Russia-Wikileaks documents just before the Mid-Term election of 2018. I think that ties in with the other events.
@ai_jared September 21, 2018--Trump reverses decision to declassify Trump-Russia-Wikileaks documents.

November 7, 2018---Democrats win House majority in mid-term elections.

November 8, 2018---Trump fires Attorney General Jeff Sessions
@ai_jared December 7, 2018--Trump nominates William Barr to replace Jeff Sessions as Attorney General.

January 4, 2019---Mueller granted six months extension on Trump-Russia-Wikileaks grand jury.

February 14, 2019--Barr confirmed by Senate as Attorney General.
Read 16 tweets
30 Oct 20
@CBSNews "the New England Patriots of messing with elections"

Now, just how can that be? Let's take a look at the history of the intelligence about Russian interference in elections.
@CBSNews We have to go back to 2014 to find where the saga of "Russian Interference" began. It is early spring and John Brennan is on the ropes with the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Investigated by the committee because of the torture stories in the media, Brennan is now...
@CBSNews ...struggling. His answer was to HACK the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) to find out what SSCI knows and how they know it. Brennan's hack is detected, and now he has a hacking investigation to go with torture. It was at this point that the...
Read 36 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!