A majority of you quickly settled on one of two names: Johnson and Clinton. Those are the two front-runners… but JOHNSON is the winner here. There have been 5 people named Johnson to receive Electoral College votes.
- Richard Mentor Johnson, VP candidate in 1836 & 1840 (the 2nd was an odd one)
- Herschel Vespasian Johnson, Stephen Douglas’s 1860 running mate.
- Andrew Johnson, 1864
- Hiram Johnson, TR’s 1912 “Bull Moose” running mate
- Lyndon Johnson
There have to date been FOUR Clintons to receive electoral votes:
- George Clinton (got VP electoral votes in 1788, 1792, 1796, 1804, & 1808, & pres votes too in 1808)
- His nephew DeWitt Clinton, the federalist nominee in 1812
- Bill Clinton
- Hillary Clinton
So Johnson and Clinton are two of the five last names with three or more individuals to receive Electoral College votes. Two of the other three were common enough guesses: ADAMS and HARRISON.
Among the Adamses, you have John and John Quincy. Sam Adams also got some Electoral College votes in 1796.
On top of William Henry Harrison & his grandson Benjamin, one Robert Harrison got some votes in 1788. (He actually came in 4th, behind only Washington, Adams & Jay!)
Only two of you, I think, guessed “Davis.”
- David Davis got one single electoral vote in the messed up 1872 election
- Henry Gassaway Davis was the Democratic VP nominee in 1904
- John W. Davis was the Democratic VP nominee in 1924
You can see a list of EVERYONE to receive Electoral College votes here, thanks to the tireless labor of Wikipedia contributors: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_p…
More trivia: George Clinton is one of two men to serve as vice president under two different presidents. He was Jefferson’s running mate in 1804 (replacing Aaron Burr, for obvious reasons), and then stayed on in the job as Madison’s 1808 running mate.
(The other is Calhoun.)
Richard Mentor Johnson has TWO odd elections. In 1836, he was the running mate to the victorious Martin Van Buren. But the Virginia delegation, pledged to Johnson, refused to vote for him because he was in an open common-law marriage with Julia Chinn, his slave.
Virginia’s abstention meant the Electoral College didn’t have a majority for any VP, so the Senate had to pick it. It chose Johnson, on a party-line vote.
In 1840, Van Buren wanted to dump Johnson as his VP, but feared doing so would split the party. So Democrats didn’t nominate ANYONE for VP alongside Van Buren, letting states choose their own candidates. Johnson campaigned for himself as VP and got 48 electoral votes.
The 1872 election was another odd one. Newspaperman Horace Greeley was the nominee of the Democratic Party and a group of anti-Grant Republicans under the “Liberal Republican” banner. But Greeley, who lost, died before the Electoral College met. His electors voted for whoever.
Davis, who got a single 1872 electoral vote, was a Supreme Court justice (he wrote “Ex parte Milligan”) with a powerful reputation for independence. He tried to get nominated for president in 1872 as a sitting justice, then went right back on serving on the bench.
Davis also played a huge & crazy role in the disputed 1876 election. A commission was appointed to settle disputed votes: 5 Republican senators, 5 Democratic representatives, 2 Republican justices & 2 Dem justices — and Davis, famously independent, set to be the deciding vote.
BUT Illinois Democrats came up with a too-cleve scheme: they elected him to the U.S. Senate, perhaps to buy his support. But Davis promptly resigned the court to accept the seat, upsetting the commission’s balance! The only remaining justices were Republicans.
And so the commission voted on party lines, 8-7, to award the disputed electors to the Republican candidate, Hayes. I discussed that mess in an earlier thread:
Later, again because of his unshakable reputation for independence, now-Sen. Davis was chosen as Senate President Pro Tem. That meant when James Garfield was assassinated, Davis was next in line for the presidency had Chester Arthur died! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Dav…
15 other last names have had exactly two people get electoral votes: Bryan, Bush, Butler, Hancock, King, Lincoln, Marshall, Pinckney, Roosevelt, Smith, Stevenson, Wallace, Warren, Wheeler and Wilson.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Minnesota reported 21 #COVID19 deaths today. That’s the lowest figure on a Friday since the 18 reported on Oct. 30. Just two Fridays ago, Minnesota reported 48 #COVID19 deaths.
Cases and positivity rate have also been trending down:
It looks like #COVID19 ICU admissions in Minnesota might have bottomed out at around 10 per day. That’s about where Minnesota was at for about 4 months earlier this year, from early June through late September.
As of today, Minnesota has reported more than 6,000 #COVID19 deaths.
Tomorrow, January will probably pass May as Minnesota's third-deadliest month of the pandemic so far. But we’ve fallen behind the pace of deaths in November (when deaths were rising, not falling as they are now):
Minnesota has averaged about 28 #COVID19 deaths per day over the past week. That compares to an average of 35 deaths/day last Thursday.
For context, on Nov. 1, MN was averaging 18 COVID deaths/day. On Oct. 1, 9/day.
Alright, America has a new president, but #COVID19 stats keep on coming, and so do the graphs.
Minnesota reported 34 additional #COVID19 deaths today. That’s down from 50 last Wednesday (but possibly is nudged down by the holiday Monday). The 7-day average is down to 29 deaths per day — the first time Minnesota has averaged fewer than 30 COVID deaths per day since Nov. 10.
An extra 1,237 newly reported cases is down from 1,504 last Wednesday. The 7-day average is down to 1,324 cases per day, the lowest since Oct. 15.
TRIVIA: Two people with the last name “Roosevelt” have received electoral college votes, one of 20 such last names with multiple electoral vote recipients.
What last name has the MOST individuals bearing it who have received electoral votes?
A follow-up question: there are FIVE last names born by three or more individuals to receive Electoral College votes. (Another 15, like Roosevelt, have received two.) What are these five names?
I’ll announce the answer in 10 minutes, so get your guesses in now!
Reading HW Brands’ “The Zealot & The Emancipator,” I was struck by a good way to analogize Lincoln’s famous lack of political experience — a single, decade-old term in Congress, and a few even older terms in the state legislature, before an unsuccessful bid for U.S. Senate. 1/
2/ It’s not that Lincoln was an outsider, like Zachary Taylor, elected president on the basis of his war heroism despite having never served in any prior political office and indeed never really expressing any political beliefs. Lincoln was intensely involved in IL politics.
3/ No, Abraham Lincoln in the 1850s was the 19th Century equivalent of a modern cable news commentator.
This piece gets at an element of the ongoing debate over whether certain terms — “lie,” “coup,” “fascist,” “socialist” — should be applied today. The two sides are sort of talking past each other, with some people focusing on LOGICAL definitions & others on EMOTIONAL ones.
One person says, “Well, I define [Term X] as [definition], and event A, while terrible, doesn’t fit that definition. Rather, we should use [alternative technical term].”
Others basically argue, “Stop quibbling! This is bad, let’s use the term that conveys how bad it is!”
People using “emotional definitions” don’t want to use a dry technical term to describe something or someone they dislike. They want to use a term with a powerful (negative) emotional valence, to capture the proper attitude to the target.