a detail from Steele 302 for people interested in data, as opposed to wild speculations. Identity of the SSA who accompanied SIA Brian Auten to Steele Oct 2017 interview is presently unknown. There is 12-character and 9 character redaction below. Prob SSA 12345678 and SIA Auten
2/ from comparison of slightly different redactions in first paragraphs of two 302 versions, it appears that SSA 1234567890123 in 1st paragraph is SSA 1234 12345678 - no initial.
3/ some time ago, walkafyre observed that Paul Woodbery, Priestap's former Chief of Staff, became ALAT in London in May 2016. He was still ALAT in London in Oct 2017.
4/ I pointed out last month that the London ALAT (Woodbery) got a cameo in Strzok's book as Strzok's pal who had helped to arrange the Downer interview.
6/ there is zero indication that ALAT Woodbery had any knowledge, let alone, in-depth knowledge of contradictions between Steele and Danchenko information. The 2017 interview was singularly useless.
7/ It was, as the file name itself says, a "debriefing" of Steele, not the arduous examination that even the most remote Trump associates were subjected to. The interview drifted off into tangential topics that shed no light on Crossfire Hurricane.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Solomon has published two new documents, only one of which is listed on his Dig Here page justthenews.com/sites/default/…. and is rehash of notes released by Grassley in Dec. See my thread here
2/ Solomon said that the 302 of the Steele October 2017 is the "first" declassified document. Solomon told Lou Dobbs yesterday that he would be up all night with the releases. Morning has come and thus far. the 302 is the ONLY declassification.
3/ most of the content of the 302 was already known from the (redacted) SIA notes on the Steele Oct 2017 interview which were published in December 2020 and slightly, and mostly irrelevantly, less redacted in this version.
Solomon has just published first supposed drop from much ballyhooed declassification. justthenews.com/accountability…. A slightly varied redaction of agent notes on Steele's Oct 2017 interview that were already published by Grassley on Dec 3, 2020 hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
What BS.
2/ to show the obstinacy of intel agency bureaucrats, redactions on first page of 2021 version (right) are GREATER than corresponding section of prior version. Unbelievable. (There is some microscopic new info, which I'll parse.)
3/ top of page 2. Left- old. Right -new. Some already public material redacted. Tillerson name unredacted. Uninformative unredaction about former Steele network.
Remember when Gonna Graham said that he was going to "get to the bottom" of something or other. And was even going to call witnesses. I'll give a short thread from questioning of SSA1 (Pientka) to give you a flavor of the abject uselessness and failure of Gonna's process.
2/ On hand to ensure that Pientka didn't answer questions were eight (!) lawyers: three for Pientka personally, three from FBI and two from DOJ.
3/ when Committee counsel inquired about predication of Flynn investigation, Pientka lawyer directed him not to answer, so he didn't. Committee lawyer didn't object or inquire as to basis of refusal.
2/ Solomon says that Fiona Hill will be named as person who introduced Danchenko to Steele. This isn't a surprise. I and others surmised this last summer.
what is probably going to be missing are the key attribution documents on DNC hack? Bannon's original request in transition was to see the exact document that Obama was presented was with to justify Dec 29, 2016 measures. Obama admin refused to provide it.
Five hours after @politicalwilli (and then me) drew attention to this guy, FBI asked for information Their timestamp is 7:59 PM Eastern (2021-01-13T00:59:40+00:00) fbi.gov/wanted/seeking…
The FBI poster doesn't show the arrival of this guy. He is first seen at 24:20 of Jayden X video emerging from behind police lines (as @politicalwilli explained earlier).
unanticipated consequences: de-platforming of Trump by US social media is forcing other countries, especially other big countries, to assess penetration of their communications systems by US social media.
2/ Why should India, with all of its computer skills, out-source social media to US corporations, especially ones that are politically partisan?
3/ there's an important economic incentive for other nations to seize this issue while it's hot. Big social media are so profitable because they've captured local and national advertising markets at expense of local newspapers and magazines, now out of business or state supported