The use of 'Her phone' in the headline straight away implies to readers this is an unusual case of a female teenager who has committed the crime of accessing child pornography - a crime more commonly committed by members of the male sex /2
This is further substantiated by the word 'woman' in the first sentence of the text. This is a breach of the Editors Code on Accuracy because this is misleading. The individual involved was not born female and is in fact someone who was born male and now identifies as a woman /3
This will have been known to the court reporter or easily checked because the defendant was listed as STEVEN (see copy of court listing below). /4
It is now common practice for court officials to use feminine pronouns if a male person identifies as a woman. This means feminine pronouns should no longer be considered an accurate reflection of an individual's sex. Court reporters will be aware of this practice now /5
While verbatim quotes from judges and barristers will necessarily contain preferred pronouns any comments made by the newspaper such as "a woman who downloaded...." should not be using gendered terms without context because this misleads the reader. /6
This can be achieved by not using gendered terms at all. "a teenager who..." or "a person who...". Or if they do choose to use gendered terms then be clear this is in reference to a gender identity and not sex "A teenager who identifies as a woman...". /7
This inaccuracy regarding sex is in a breach of the code because it significantly affects the central point of the article - a male found downloading child pornography. It matters because this is giving the false impression this person was female /8
This distorts public perception about the sexed pattern of this particular crime. It is incredibly rare for females to download child pornography but relatively common offence in males (today there are ~13,000 males in prison for sexual offences and less than 150 females) /9
The complaint to IPSO has been submitted today. We will update in a few weeks with their reply and decision /end
The use of the word 'female' in the headline and text is inaccurate and misleading. The story is based on crime statistics recorded by the police. The police do not record the birth sex of an individual in crime records. /1
They record someone's self declared gender. This means the statement such as 'female paedophiles has almost doubled' cannot be made based on these statistics. The statistics quoted to show the increase includes both sexes; it includes women born female and transwomen born male /2
Readers understand the word 'female' to mean someone born the female sex. A headline saying 'female paedophiles almost doubles' and accompanying text "an 84% increase in female perpetrated child sexual abuse" misleads readers and therefore breaches the Editors Code on Accuracy /3
Tonight the @BBCRadio4 documentary 'File On Four' made the claim that growing numbers of women are sexually abusing children. The data cannot be used to show this because police no longer record a perpetrator sex. They now record self-identified gender /1
The BBC claims “Between 2015 and 2019, the numbers of reported cases of female-perpetrated child sexual abuse to police in England and Wales rose from 1,249 to 2,297 – an increase of 84%.“ /2 fairplayforwomen.com/sex_data_wrong/
The vast majority of child sexual abuse is committed by the male sex. The Crime Survey for England and Wales revealed 96% of adults asked about their experiences of child sexual abuse said it involved a male perpetrator. It is unusual for a lone perpetrator to be female /3
Last year Kate McEwan wrote a blog published on Graham Lineham's website. She revealed how a trans-identified male called Karen Passmore was bullying a woman called Esther. /1
It is only a criminal offence to disclose protected information about someone with a GRC (including birth sex) if the person who discloses *knows* the other has a GRC. /3 legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/7/s…
Liberal Democrat Party requires parliamentary candidate to apologise and seek mentoring after calling women 'terfs' /1 fairplayforwomen.com/liberal-democr…
On 2 December 2020 the Liberal Democrats held an official complaints hearing after receiving multiple reports from members of the public about the unacceptable behaviour of one of their prospective parliamentary candidates (PPC) on social media /2
They ruled that a tweet posted by Dan Schmeising, their parliamentary candidate for Cardiff South and Penarth, during the run-up to the 2019 General Election brought the party into disrepute.
"Save yourself the stress and just block them mate, TERFs aren’t worth the hassle”. /3
MPs asked gentle, empathetic, sometimes leading questions of the trans witnesses. They expressed sympathy with their position, did not challenge or request evidential back-up for a single claim. That their sympathies lay with trans people & not women was clear from the start /2
Peter Gibson’s questions were based on the premise that the needs of trans community had simply been ignored by the government rather than fairly balanced alongside all stakeholder groups in society /3
Legislators and policy makers must make evidenced-based decisions to ensure the impact on all affected groups is considered, understood and fairly balanced. This means they need information on the demographics of different groups in society, including for transwomen /2
Our evidence matters in two areas of law: Equality Act 2010 & GRA2004. It helps service providers evaluate whether their single-sex service is a "proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim". It also informs legislators on the impact of GRA reform on women in prison /3