I get a lot of questions about #Navalny. I am not the world's leading expert on the man, but I can answer most of them with enough veracity.
Specifically:
"Is it true he is a neo-Nazi/homophobe/mysogynist/anti-Semite?"
"What are the charges against him?"
"Why did he return?"...
"Why is Putin afraid of him?"
"Does he pose real danger to Putin?"
OK, let's start with the first one, because it definitely contains bad news.
Yes, Navalny has in the past openly promoted views that can only be described as white nationalist and xenophobic. No doubt here at all
He has attended and has been a vocal participant in "The Russian March", an annual gathering of right-wing nationalist groups, most of whom are unambiguously anti-semitic, anti-minority and doubtlessly homophobic. He has made videos portraying Muslims as pests...
He was an advocate of individual gun ownership for the purposes of defending one's domicile from non-Slavic "invaders."
Even though his supporters say he has tempered his views since, I have never heard him publicly renounce them, apologize or take anything back.
So, yes, he's fashy enough to be considered quite unsavory in the Western cultural context. I have never heard him voice expressly anti-Semitic views or anything too homophobic or misogynistic for Russia. His white nationalism seems to be mostly directed at migrants from Caucasus
This is not the entire picture of his political persona. He is a free-market classical liberal who supports democracy and free elections. He is moderate and mainstream on climate. He is nationalistic on Russia's foreign policy and does not support returning Crimea to Ukraine...
So, yes, it's complicated. Being his fan is a step too far for me personally.
Question 2.
The charges against him are absolutely bogus, his prosecution is illegal and baseless, his detainment is politically motivated. None of this is in any dispute, none of this is even secret...
He is charged with defrauding his business clients. Business clients who have specifically signed an affidavit saying they have no complaints with the services his company rendered. All of this is trumped up, the original trial years ago was nothing but a kangaroo court...
Question 3.
Navalny is doubtlessly gifted with the kind of personal courage few people possess. He had a choice between fighting Putin's regime from abroad and, possibly, fading into obscurity or becoming a Russian Mandela. Ironically, he chose the latter.
Questions 4/5.
Navalny is not a political threat to Putin as we understand political threats. Putin has no political opposition, because he fully controls who gets and who doesn't get to be on the ballot or on TV. Navalny will never get elected to anything in Putin's Russia...
Additionally, Navalny isn't even a unifying figure for the Russian opposition. He is a terrible team player, seems to be mostly concerned with doing his own thing and is not terribly liked by most people who know him personally. He has alienated as many allies as he's made...
And those people who like and respect Navalny mostly view him as a blogger, a reporter, an investigator, a truth-teller, a corruption fighter, but not as a potential political leader. This could also be something he aims to change by becoming a Russian Mandela.
But it is Navalny's investigative work that Putin is furious about. Navalny has exposed him and his cronies as a bunch of avaricious grifters that they are. He is showing them to be ridiculous, tacky, shameless leeches swimming in luxury and defrauding the common man...
I don't know what the proportions of hatred and terror are in the emotions Navalny elicits in Putin, but the emotion is undoubtedly strong enough to have him eliminated, even at the cost of (further) political isolation.
And now, the last question.
"Why should I support Navalny?"
Several reasons. 1. He is not great, but he is legitimately the best Russia has right now. 2. He may say lots of nonsense, but he deserves saying it as a living and free man. 3. Not all dragon-slayers are people you want to have a coffee with. But someone needs to slay dragons.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you are not one of the 75+ million people who have seen this video on YouTube, here is Navalny's investigation into Putin's ridiculous $1 billion royal palace on the Black Sea, built on taxpayers' money.
You may need to sit down for this.
It's subtitled
Among the highlights:
- A full-size hockey arena built underground
- A full-size luxurious theater
- Handmade Italian furniture, with couches that cost $20-30K
- A hookah room with a stage for pole dancing
- A tunnel blasted through a hillside for a wine-tasting room with a view
- A private casino
- Thousands of acres of forests and vineyards
- $1000 toilet paper holders and toilet brushes
- A no-fly zone around the compound
The slush fund required to build the Venetian palazzo was started with money meant for purchase of medical equipment for hospitals
There is absolutely nothing, nothing at all, that would make anyone watching the #Sabres play hockey in any way hopeful, excited or willing to ever repeat the experience again.
If a long-dead corpse still moving due to escaping gasses were a sports franchise, this would be it.
Literally. All attempts to revive the team with new talent or new coaching approaches are akin to giving electric shocks to a rotting corpse. It shakes up the maggots, but nothing more.
The Sabres are the most depressing sight in sports. They are not even adorable losers...
They are not "so bad, it's good" or "a ragtag gang of misfits." Their badness, their sheer, utter inadequacy is simply appalling. It's revolting. It makes one question the existence of truth, morals, right and wrong. It makes one doubt that there is a limit to human depravity...
To all you media types who still think we need to talk to Trump voters, understand them, hear them. Can I save you a bit of trouble? Here is a (short, I promise) thread about who they are, what they want and where they are coming from.
It's not complicated, either...
My bio says "sports writer", and this is what I used to be (and still am, occasionally), but my full time job is a public school teacher. I teach in Baltimore, in low-income areas. One of my former jobs was in a mostly white, working-class community, full of rabid Trumpers...
This was probably the worst job I ever had, which had little to do with the community or the kids and a lot to do with admin, but that's beside the point. The kids all came from very poor, very dysfunctional families, rife with drugs, abuse and violence. Many were unmanageable...
The biggest danger of shrewd, unprincipled demagogues their utter lack of self-reflection and shame. And if those of them who also lack brains, like Trump, at least amplify their evil nature with poison and viciousness, crafty ones, like Cruz, will climb the high horse in a jiffy
This vile, despicable vermin has assumed the role of the chief "owner of libs" ever since was so foolishly ushered into Congress. To say that he has treated "half the country that doesn't agree" with him with contempt is to say nothing.
Yet he dares to lecture us on unity!
He has called the other side every name in the book, slandered and ridiculed everyone in the other half of the nation, cursed them for communists and baby-killers, yet he dares to lecture us on civility!
The best Kazakhstani player of all time is Evgeni Nabokov. But, like Antropov, he is an ethnic Russian. The best Kazakh is Talgat Zhailauov.
The best Latvian of all time is Helmuts Balderis. This is not in dispute.
Best Lithuanian: Darius Kasparaitis
Best Belarusian: Mikhail Grabovski
Best Spaniard: Valeri Kharlamov
Best Tatar: Danis Zaripov
Best Jew: well... it pains me to say but Evgeni Malkin and Vladimir Myshkin are both quite, quite goyishe. We'll have to go with Panarin.
Panarin is at least quarter Jewish. His maternal grandfather bears the amazing name of Vladimir Ilyich Levin.