I cheered to see the results of the US election. It was an enormous relief (as many Republicans agreed) to see the defeat of Trump. An enormous relief for the environment; /1
An enormous relief for all those desperate for COVID relief and a centralized vaccination and testing program; /2
An enormous relief for undocumented immigrants, who have been living in fear; /3
An enormous relief for those concerned for the preservation of democracy and voting rights; /4
An enormous relief for those who are eager to see a renewed commitment to facts, to science and to the truth. To renounce lies. Let’s agree to commit to facts, science and truth./5
Everywhere./6
Let’s make sure that people understand it is not scientific or truthful to base policy on the nebulous concept of “gender identity” instead of the scientific, factual truth of biological sex./7
It is also not “kind”. Let’s forge ahead, not just in the US but everywhere, with policies ensuring that everyone is treated with dignity and without discrimination./8
But girls and women, lesbians, gays and bisexuals have rights too. Perhaps you have been told that all LGBT people agree with the gender identity lobby. Not true./9
Let’s start a conversation. About the US Equality Act #HR5 and similar legislative proposals worldwide. Without polarizing or hurling insults. About how to treat kids with gender dysphoria. About how to be fair and truthful to everyone. Facts matter. Fairness matters./10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@StemopeenVrouw Volgens @StemopeenVrouw is iedereen die zich identificeert als vrouw een vrouw. (En omgekeerd een man, neem ik aan). Geen discussie. Dit betekent dat de definitie van “vrouw” naar binnen worden verplaatst, naar een persoonlijk gevoel, in plaats van objectieve werkelijkheid. /1of2
@StemopeenVrouw Als er geen vrouwen zijn die objectief als zodanig kunnen worden beschreven, zijn er geen #vrouwenrechten meer. Er is in Nederland geen linkse vrouwenbeweging die deze elementaire waarheid begrijpt. In de VK gelukkig wel. Vrouwen van #Nederland, word wakker!/2of2
What Graham says here, “I didn’t think I’d have to talk about it long. I thought others would see this was obviously wrong, and step in” rings true. I remember thinking it several times.
I thought it about athletes with male bodies taking part in women’s sporting events. “Well, people who know about sport will soon point out that that is completely unfair and put a stop to it”!
I thought it when I first heard the cotton ceiling rhetoric: “Well, all women, and certainly all lesbians, will immediately identify this as homophobic and misogynistic and rise up in fierce opposition!”
Our letter in today’s Sunday Times
“GAY PEOPLE LOSING FAITH IN STONEWALL
Last October a group of LGB rights supporters asked Stonewall to “commit to fostering an atmosphere of respectful debate rather than demonising as transphobic those who wish to discuss,/2
or dissent from, Stonewall’s transgender policies”. Since then, Stonewall has refused repeated requests to enter into any such dialogue.
The government continues to treat Stonewall as if it represented the views of progressive thinking in general, and specifically LGB opinion./3
It does not. We believe it has made mistakes in its approach that undermine women’s sex-based rights and protections. The most worrying aspect of this is that all primary-school children are now challenged to review their “gender identity”/4
So. After @ruth_hunt’s interview with @GuardianAnushka I tweeted on 30 April: “Ruth, I listened with interest and noted your call for a civil discussion. I agreed with many points while others perplexed me. Are you willing to engage, e.g. by email?
I am really interested in your replies to my questions. I am committed to civil debate.” She tweeted back: “Sure, drop us an email. Info@stonewall.org uk.”
So I did. It’s certainly a long letter with lots of questions, but no one could say it’s not civil.
To this day she has neither replied nor acknowledged it. So here it is. I’ll make it into a proper thread at the end. "1 May 2019
Dear Ruth,
Thank you for being willing to engage.
Helpful advice from Stonewall's website:
Q “How do you know you’re trans?”
A "Many people know they’re trans from a young age. Some trans people might not have the language or understanding of what it means to be trans until later in life.”/2
“But it is always something innate and absolutely core to your sense of self. It’s not something that’s a fad, a 'lifestyle choice' or something that comes and goes. It is an essential part of who you are that can’t be changed."/3
"If you aren’t recognised as being the gender you know you are, it’s extremely damaging.”/4
Here are the definitions of male and female on MedicineNet. “Female: The traditional definition of female was ‘an individual of the sex that bears young’ or ‘that produces ova or eggs’."/2
“However, things are not so simple today. Female can be defined by physical appearance, by chromosome constitution (see Female chromosome complement), or by gender identification.”/3
“Female chromosome complement: The large majority of females have a 46, XX chromosome complement (46 chromosomes including two X chromosomes).”/4