1/ This story omg nytimes.com/2021/01/22/us/…
3/ This kind of direct and illegal pressure on DOJ (and Georgia, and god knows who else) to overturn election results isn't in the articles of impeachment but maybe it should be.
If Republicans think two weeks is going to present a better set of facts, boy I don't know.
If Republicans think two weeks is going to present a better set of facts, boy I don't know.
4/ Hard to even tell anymore, but this might be in top five most bonkers/illegal/scary stories of the entire Trump era.
5/ Tried to illegally influence election officials to overturn election
Tried to illegally influence DOJ to overturn election
Tried to illegally influence VP to overturn election
When that didn't work, he incited a mob to storm Capitol
Tried to illegally influence DOJ to overturn election
Tried to illegally influence VP to overturn election
When that didn't work, he incited a mob to storm Capitol
6/ Increasingly clear that we had a closer call than even nail bitters like me knew at the time.
7/ Clark—a leading DOJ lawyer—being radicalize by some crap he read on the Internet is the low-key scariest bit of all this maybe.
They should review his browser history.
They should review his browser history.
8/ What's fascist for chutzpah?
9/ This maybe helps explain why Rosen (and Wray?) kept such a low profile after 1/6.
Knowing that Trump and Clark would go this far...
Knowing that Trump and Clark would go this far...
10/ Do not miss that Jeffrey Clark is also the guy that Trump put on trying to keep @ejeancarroll from suing him for libel (and getting DNA discovery admitted re her rape allegation): twitter.com/ejeancarroll/s
11/ In addition to possibly explaining why Rosen and Wray were mum re 1/6, this story might be key to the resignation of US Attorney BJ Pak and maybe even Bill Barr. npr.org/2021/01/05/953…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
