The plan is scheduled or a Feb. 16 public hearing and vote.
Specifically, we're talking about Community Connectors. Basically a form of cultural brokers who serve to connect underserved communities to the city gov't (programs, services, etc.)
Ryan Hanschen has that Colorado accent where he leaves out most of the consonants in a words. "Counity Coectors"
Ya'll ever notice that or is it just me?
Adele Aguirre is a community connector from Orchard Grove mobile home park, for example. Help keeps the residents there engaged and informed.
Community Connectors are introducing themselves per a pre-recorded video.
Juan Moreno repping the pansexual community! (Among others) Woot woot!
OK, back to Aimee Kane, racial equity manager.
Often in council meetings, members will ask if a program, etc. has gone through the racial equity tool, Kane says.
Council going to ask the question of what projects they want the racial equity tool applied to. This will "focus our energy" and "ensure we are having the most impact," Kane says.
Brockett: I'd turn that around and say I hope we can integrate this work as much as possible in our work plan. Idk that council is the best expert on where to apply this tool.
Kane: That's the eventual goal but having that focus on some real high-priority issues will help.
Young suggests workplan items "that have some element of economic mobility."
OK, so council isn't exactly giving ideas for where to apply the tool. Kane says once council's priorities are hammered out, the community connectors will decide where the tool could be most effective.
Council will get an update March 16, and the racial equity instrument will start being implemented March 17.
Soo... I guess that was it for racial equity...?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Weaver, Joseph and Young apparently have no understanding of what it means to have a "holistic discussion" on homelessness.
That's not me saying it... that's literally what they are saying in a scheduling meeting now about the followup to Tuesday's meeting.
"I don’t really comprehend what that means bc in the end we make discrete decisions. ... I don’t understand what a holistic (discussion) means." boulderbeat.news/2021/01/21/bou…
Council decided last week that camps will keep being removed BUT they didn't weigh in on staff's recommendations for more enforcement. Members Brockett/Friend said they didn't want to vote on those without also considering more services....
We're gonna move to talking about boards and how they interact with one another / council. Won't be ask exciting as the last item (which was the meat) but I'll tweet what's necessary.
First up is the interaction of DAB/Planning Board. Reminder: Council's justification for having a PB with ZERO industry professionals on it was that DAB could provide that. boulderbeat.news/2020/04/02/cit…
DAB = Design Advisory Board. They focus on projects of a certain value (over $25,000, I think?) in the downtown area. New development or external renovation.
Another Friend suggestion: Do we want to require all new buildings to be electric, like other cities have done? Seems like the time given our Xcel partnership.
Weaver also had this on his list.
Jonathan Koehn: This is ongoing work. We've been thinking about it as part of the Climate Action Plan coming to council for an update this year.
"We really do need to be mindful of costs and equity," Koehn says.
Moving on: Council priorities and work plan for 2021. With input from staff.
First q: Do we want to add COVID as a priority? Given that, well, you know, it is. So this is really about "formalizing" by adding it to the Official List.
No opposition to that, so it will be added, and the 12 existing priorities will remain.