11/OK, so in the next two decades, as we install solar and batteries at exponentially increasing scale, these technologies will have a chance to make a big real difference in our world.
But installation isn't sufficient for them to raise productivity. There's one other piece...
12/To really raise productivity, solar and batteries don't just have to be cheap enough to replace fossil fuels.
They need to be so cheap that they provide SIGNIFICANTLY CHEAPER ENERGY than fossil fuels.
Cheap energy is what will drive productivity growth.
13/Fortunately, the trends look unstoppable. Solar and batteries (and probably wind, and maybe other storage technologies) WILL provide much cheaper energy than fossil fuels...eventually.
14/Here's a summary of the latest trends in solar costs, via the incomparable @ramez.
16/...And of course this is all IN ADDITION to the fact that solar and batteries are much more sustainable than fossil fuels and hurt the climate far less, which allows productivity *today* to be matched by productivity over the *long term*.
17/So the techno-pessimists are wrong about solar and batteries. This is a true technological revolution, it is still ongoing, and it will touch all of our lives in big important ways.
I respect disagree with this thread. The idea that hyperinflation results from a regime change is an unproven hypothesis. It's something we should be studying, yes, but for now it's just a guess.
In particular, if we stop worrying about austerity like we used to, and then at some point we DO experience hyperinflation, the Tom Sargents of the future will look back and call our attitude shift a "regime change". And who will be able to disprove them?
2/Some people say that we're already heading into the danger zone with respect to debt.
My instinct is that these people are completely wrong, and we're not in danger. But I can't *prove* them wrong, because we don't actually know how much is too much.
Biden's vaccine target should be 200 million in 100 days, not 100 million in 100 days.
I guess with only 235 million adults in the U.S. and a large fraction hesitant about taking the vaccine, 200 million probably isn't possible. But 100 million seems like a lowball.
Also, vaccine production is running at about 2 million doses a day (enough to vaccinate 1 million people), so 100 million in 100 days is probably close to the limit of production capacity unless we approve the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.
2/Left-NIMBYs have developed a canon of interlocking, mutually reinforcing beliefs about housing and urbanism.
These beliefs are mostly false, but they form a powerful "canon" that quickly ossifies into a hardened worldview.
It looks something like this:
3/Fortunately, Nathan J. Robinson of Current Affairs has written an article that perfectly encapsulates the Left-NIMBY worldview (and quotes me in it!).
1/Today in @bopinion, I talk about the legacy and career of Jim Simons, the founder of Renaissance Technologies, who is stepping down as the hedge fund's chairman.