1/Some people look at the amazing cost declines in solar power and batteries and ask "Where's the productivity growth?"

In this post, I answer that question: "It's coming."

noahpinion.substack.com/p/answering-th…
2/It's true that solar, for example, has come down in cost by a truly stunning amount.

This is a LOG plot. Check out the y-axis!
3/Some people look at this graph and ask "So, where's the productivity growth?"

Honey, you gotta actually BUILD the solar before it does anything.

applieddivinitystudies.com/stagnation/
4/Solar installation is ramping up at an exponential rate:

But that's from a very low base. It's still only maybe 3% of global electricity generation!
5/As of 2019, solar and wind together were 2/3 of new installed electricity generation.

about.bnef.com/blog/solar-and…
6/Even the most optimistic forecasts for solar are probably way too conservative (they have been in the past).

7/"B...but...but solar is intermittent!", cry the skeptics.

LOL, that's fine. It's so cheap now that we can afford to overbuild, so that we have plenty solar power on cloudy days and during the winter.

qz.com/1950381/the-ca…
8/And at night?

Batteries.

Did I mention that batteries are getting exponentially cheaper as well?
9/Speaking of batteries, we're just about reaching the point where electric cars will begin replacing our auto fleet.

theguardian.com/environment/20…
10/Automakers are starting to cancel gasoline-powered models.

electrive.com/2021/01/22/aud…
11/OK, so in the next two decades, as we install solar and batteries at exponentially increasing scale, these technologies will have a chance to make a big real difference in our world.

But installation isn't sufficient for them to raise productivity. There's one other piece...
12/To really raise productivity, solar and batteries don't just have to be cheap enough to replace fossil fuels.

They need to be so cheap that they provide SIGNIFICANTLY CHEAPER ENERGY than fossil fuels.

Cheap energy is what will drive productivity growth.
13/Fortunately, the trends look unstoppable. Solar and batteries (and probably wind, and maybe other storage technologies) WILL provide much cheaper energy than fossil fuels...eventually.
14/Here's a summary of the latest trends in solar costs, via the incomparable @ramez.

rameznaam.com/2020/05/14/sol…
15/In fact, cheap energy might be uniquely powerful in terms of driving productivity growth, even relative to other types of technology!

noahpinion.substack.com/p/why-im-so-ex…
16/...And of course this is all IN ADDITION to the fact that solar and batteries are much more sustainable than fossil fuels and hurt the climate far less, which allows productivity *today* to be matched by productivity over the *long term*.
17/So the techno-pessimists are wrong about solar and batteries. This is a true technological revolution, it is still ongoing, and it will touch all of our lives in big important ways.

(end)

noahpinion.substack.com/p/answering-th…
Anyway, if you like this sort of stuff, subscribe to my free email list here! Get Noah Smith Thought delivered directly to your inbox. 😊

noahpinion.substack.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noah Smith 🐇

Noah Smith 🐇 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Noahpinion

24 Jan
1/I've been thinking back on the Bernie movement this week. And I felt it was time for a retrospective.

So let's talk about that movement, and what it was, and how it changed our country, and how it failed to change our country.

noahpinion.substack.com/p/the-bernie-m…
2/Thanks to Bernie, "socialism" isn't a dirty word in America anymore.

wsws.org/en/articles/20…
3/And even the "centrist" Biden is putting forward the boldest, most progressive legislative agenda since...LBJ?

washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
Read 7 tweets
22 Jan
I respect disagree with this thread. The idea that hyperinflation results from a regime change is an unproven hypothesis. It's something we should be studying, yes, but for now it's just a guess.
That was supposed to be "respectfully", dang it
In particular, if we stop worrying about austerity like we used to, and then at some point we DO experience hyperinflation, the Tom Sargents of the future will look back and call our attitude shift a "regime change". And who will be able to disprove them?

Read 8 tweets
22 Jan
1/Lots of people ask me: "Noah, how much can the U.S. government borrow before bad things start happening?"

In this newsletter, I try to give a definitive answer to that question.

Unfortunately, the answer is: No one knows.

noahpinion.substack.com/p/no-one-knows…
2/Some people say that we're already heading into the danger zone with respect to debt.

My instinct is that these people are completely wrong, and we're not in danger. But I can't *prove* them wrong, because we don't actually know how much is too much.

ft.com/content/d49b53…
3/How can we think about what the government's borrowing constraint really is?

Well, it helps to do a thought experiment. Let's imagine if the government kept borrowing exponentially more. $100 trillion. $100 quadrillion. Etc.

What would happen?
Read 22 tweets
21 Jan
Biden's vaccine target should be 200 million in 100 days, not 100 million in 100 days.
I guess with only 235 million adults in the U.S. and a large fraction hesitant about taking the vaccine, 200 million probably isn't possible. But 100 million seems like a lowball.
Also, vaccine production is running at about 2 million doses a day (enough to vaccinate 1 million people), so 100 million in 100 days is probably close to the limit of production capacity unless we approve the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

nytimes.com/2021/01/21/hea…
Read 5 tweets
19 Jan
1/OK, so. Let's talk about Left-NIMBYism.

We all know about Right-NIMBYs, rabidly protecting their white-flight suburbs from Those People. And there are plenty of liberal NIMBYs too.

But NIMBYs of the Left are also a force to be reckoned with.

noahpinion.substack.com/p/the-left-nim…
2/Left-NIMBYs have developed a canon of interlocking, mutually reinforcing beliefs about housing and urbanism.

These beliefs are mostly false, but they form a powerful "canon" that quickly ossifies into a hardened worldview.

It looks something like this:
3/Fortunately, Nathan J. Robinson of Current Affairs has written an article that perfectly encapsulates the Left-NIMBY worldview (and quotes me in it!).

So this is a teachable moment.

currentaffairs.org/2021/01/the-on…
Read 20 tweets
16 Jan
1/Today in @bopinion, I talk about the legacy and career of Jim Simons, the founder of Renaissance Technologies, who is stepping down as the hedge fund's chairman.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/Simons' fund beat the market -- consistently, by huge percentages, after fees.

That's an astonishing accomplishment.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
3/How did he do it?

Basically, by being relentlessly smarter and better-managed than the competition.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!