It is always so disappointing when really good journalists seem to be shocked by the Spectator engaging in racism, promotion of the far right, or attacking brown or black people.
It is entrenched in the Spectator.
Please listen to those who have been highlighting this...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Shawcross said: “..Islam is one of the greatest, most terrifying problems of our future. I think all European countries have vastly, very quickly growing Islamic populations"
He supported torture & the worst breaches of law in the "War on Terror"
For those who want to see more about Shawcross and what he thinks, see this thread & it may make sense why there are few worse or more frightening people to have this role
On the day the "think tank" he is Director of Policy is at (Quilliam), has its report on gang-related CSE (used by the far right) so clearly debunked *again*, you'd have thought he might have some humility.
The blind spot Baldét and other pro-Prevent propagandists have, is they don't seem to have a clue why Palestinians might find it wholly offensive to be in such a presentation.
Why is "vocal support for Palestine" even relevant to be in such a presentation?
After Julie Burchill's Islamophobia towards @AyoCaesar, she appears to have lost her book contract
It appears her publisher realised the risk to its reputation to be associated with her racism & that Burchill may cross the line again during book promotion m.facebook.com/story.php?stor…
Some context on what Julie Burchill said to Ash Sarkar
The Home Office review on "grooming gangs" finally published concludes:
1. “links between ethnicity and this form of offending” could not be proven 2. “Research has found that group-based child sexual exploitation (CSE) offenders are most commonly white" independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
“Some studies suggest an over-representation of black and Asian offenders relative to the demographics of national populations. However, it is not possible to conclude that this is representative of all group-based CSE offending.”
The document said there were issues with the data used in existing studies, sample selection and a “potential for bias and inaccuracies”
Assume this is referring to studies like the Quilliam report that was widely debunked by experts at the time, yet was cited in national papers