The human rights argument for crypto as a balance against centralized power of all kinds, from nation states to corporations, is more obvious every day.
People tried popularizing decentralized systems like Tor without the economic component. It didn’t fully work, because these systems are tricky to build and maintain.
But digital assets now provide an offsetting term that more than compensates for the technical complexity.
Crypto allows open source developers to finally capture some of the value they create. They can choose how much.
But it’s an important and general tool to address the funding gaps that @nayafia talked about in her recent book.
The long-term consequence is the end of the 20th century regulatory state.
The SEC is set up to go after Goldman, not 1M retail investors. The FDA was built to regulate Merck, not 1M people with personal genomes. And the FAA is meant to leash Boeing, not 1M drone hobbyists. 🧵
For the SEC to go after all the countless sympathetic individuals on Reddit who profited off the back of a giant fund isn’t just logistically difficult.
It’s *reputationally* difficult.
It’s like the RIAA suing its own customers. You are pursuing the little guy...why exactly?
Lyn is very smart — but Ethereum really isn’t that early in development anymore. Just from a numbers standpoint, it’s a $100B+ platform hosting multiple billion dollar projects. See defipulse.com.
That doesn’t begin to touch the tech innovation, which is substantial.
I don’t think it’s persuasive to say “Ethereum is still rapidly innovating therefore it’s not worth $100B+”.
Actually, for a platform worth $100B+ to still be rapidly innovating is a very positive signal. Excessive risk aversion is the ultimate risk. businessinsider.com/amazons-jeff-b…
Perhaps the most important difference between a tech investor and a macro investor (like @LynAldenContact) is that Lyn explicitly says she wants to invest in “finished products”.
India will not be #1 in the currency game. But it could be #1 in the cryptocurrency game.
That is, given competition from the dollar and the digital yuan, the rupee will never be as strong.
So India could get behind the third international payment rail, the one neither America nor China can deplatform them from.
As can every other state that’s neither USA nor PRC.
This would obviously be a huge reversal from where the world is right now. India’s ban on crypto has taken its toll on a generation of founders, and other places have leapt ahead.
But crypto founders are mobile, and a U-turn is possible if seen as being in the national interest.
As a freedom maximalist, any point of centralization is a vulnerability. We need:
- multiple widely adopted clients for BTC
- tools to import the BTC ledger into other chains, like trustless versions of WBTC/RenBTC
- other coins as backups
- legal & activism
Defense in depth.
The idea of cryptocurrency will not vanish from this earth. But any insufficiently decentralized protocol will get attacked.
Bitcoin is highly decentralized in terms of hodlers, wallets, etc. But could use more at client & repo level. See this from 2017: news.earn.com/quantifying-de…
Employees of media corporations give each other Pulitzers for things like 1619 or Duranty’s chicanery.
They aren’t neutral observers, and wouldn’t be pleased if outsiders began rating them. nytco.com/company/prizes…
If Facebook was giving out Google’s employee-of-the-year awards, you might expect some disalignment of incentives.
Seeking the approval of direct competitors isn’t smart. And media companies are by their own admission direct competitors of tech companies. theinformation.com/articles/mered…