It's not ignoring anything. A power dynamic doesn't mean your manager is not a person. Nor does it mean they are unaffected by your unexpected departure. Just say you don't give a shit about managers. It's okay.
I mean I know this is the basic sentiment out there. I know bad managers (and even mediocre managers) cause a lot of damage. My only real question is how y'all expect to get better managers if you keep making it such a shit job?
I know a lot of y'all don't wanna talk about it. That's why I said nevermind. Just know that when you become a manager having power is not gonna make up for the fact that people treat you like you can't be harmed by their words and actions.
There's no good way to do it. If you've already decided, then just pull them aside and tell them. If they're part of the reason you're leaving then fuck em. If they are a decent manager, consider working with them before you get to the point of quitting.
You can have a decent relationship with a manager even if they're not very good at their job. It helps a lot if you understand and accept that keeping you happy is not their job.
I tell you what, the reactions to my simple suggestion that managers are people should be teaching us a lot. The way a lot of y'all are talking about power dynamic before you get it explains a lot about how you behave after you get it.
Middle managers have a lot of power. Many of them wield it clumsily because they don't understand it. It's true to say they don't have the power that people assume they do. But power is a wide space. Having a narrow view of it isn't helpful.
A lot of middle managers have also ceded much of their power. Or allowed themselves to become marginalized and ineffectual. That's a whole conversation too, but we probably don't have time today.
One of the most important lessons that @operaqueenie taught me is that *everybody has a boss*. This idea that somebody up in the top seat gets to make decisions without answering to anybody else? That is a fallacy.
Not to mention it's also a really bad idea to not have any checks on your judgment. No matter your position. We're learning that lesson in so many ways and in so many areas. So when people talk about having power in this way, I wonder how much they've considered the implications.
When you talk about climbing up management until you get to make decisions your way and don't have to answer to anybody, what are you asking for really?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Did y'all know that a lot of white people don't have the cultural concept of "real talk"? You know where you stop saying the diplomatic thing and tell people what's really going on. They just don't have it. You try to have a moment of "real talk" and they freak the fuck out.
It's one of the things that makes it difficult for PoC, and Black people especially, to form real trust relationships with white people. Y'all don't know what's going on because no one tells you. And no one tells you because you can't actually handle the truth.
I've come to understand that white people have their own seemingly convoluted way that they decide what's going on and what to do about it. I have a really hard time navigating those rituals. I think a lot of us do. And it damages our ability to be successful in white spaces.
This went pretty well. Thanks again to everyone who participated. Also huge thanks to @wwitzel3 who volunteered to take notes. I'm working with them to curate a bit, and then we'll share.
Similarly to last time, we talked about for about an hour and 45 minutes before officially closing out the discussion. I didn't track how big the room got, but bigger than last time. Maybe 40+ people at the largest? Good crowd.
It felt a little tougher to moderate the room and rotate participants through. I think that's largely because I was doing it on my own this time. Some folks ended up waiting for quite a while before getting to share. I don't love that, and I think it's a common problem on CH.
I want to continue the frontend discussion. Specifically I want to talk about "state management". It's phrase that gets used a lot. I think it's the source of a lot of complexity in frontend today. What's the right framing of a question around that?
Let's do 5pm Pacific time again. Nobody suggested big changes to the format, so I'm going to do it the same way and maybe we'll learn some more. I'm also open to a volunteer to do detailed note taking.
I want to get something off my chest. I’ve been spending today doing house chores while listening to technical videos and podcasts. After my Clubhouse experiment yesterday, I’m thinking critically about how we expect developers to learn and grow. And... it’s a mess y’all.
The quality of information out there is all over the place. The time commitment of doing all of this watching/listening is significant. There is so much content that is seeking people’s attention. And there’s no good way to know if what you’re gonna get is any good.
I’m not about to hop out here and put anybody on blast. People put a lot of effort into creating content. (I know because I started looking into doing it and I’m way too lazy for all that). The problem is there is no good way for people to navigate this marketplace.
So this turned out pretty great in my opinion. I wanna do it again. Thanks to everyone who participated and those who showed up to listen. Thank you to my brilliant co-moderator @betsythemuffin.
First let me apologize again to those who expressed interest but were not able to get into Clubhouse. What I learned is that they have intentionally made it quite difficult to bring more people onto the platform. To be fair, it is a closed beta. But this was pretty disappointing.
I think at the maximum we probably had 30 or so people in the room. Not huge. I think it was good that the room stayed small enough that there was plenty of space for anyone who wanted to talk. I can imagine that not being true as the audience grows.
Does anybody want to have technical conversations on Clubhouse? Not podcast style. I mean real in-depth discussion about experiences building real things. There's not enough of that, and there's a real opportunity with the clubhouse format.
Sounds like there is interest in technical discussion. Here are some completely self-serving topics I wanna talk about.
- When is it time to abandon your ORM?
- Was the redux pattern a mistake?
- Kubernetes? But y tho?
That's how Clubhouse is set up. You join a room centered around a particular topic. Most people are in the "audience" to listen. The people on the "stage" can discuss. People can move back and forth between audience and stage.