So, 30 hours of battery storage for $660 / kW comes down to $22 / kWh.
That's less than one tenth of the cost of today's leading $300 / kWh Tesla "Megapack" utility battery storage product. 🤔
#modelling #assumptions #magicalthinking #antinuclearism
That's less than one tenth of the cost of today's leading $300 / kWh Tesla "Megapack" utility battery storage product. 🤔
#modelling #assumptions #magicalthinking #antinuclearism
https://twitter.com/DrChrisClack/status/1353610441671499777
Why am I challenging Dr. Clack?
Because he is selling antinuclear have-your-cake-and-eat-it renewable energy studies that he asserts "find" least-cost energy systems with little or no nuclear energy, while in fact he simply assumes it, hidden in the fine print of his papers.
Because he is selling antinuclear have-your-cake-and-eat-it renewable energy studies that he asserts "find" least-cost energy systems with little or no nuclear energy, while in fact he simply assumes it, hidden in the fine print of his papers.
Note how I try to evaluate Clacks storage cost assumption by comparing to the *best* current storage cost quote I could find.
In his effort to support his nuclear cost assumptions, he refers to the *worst* project he could find.
This is not fine.
In his effort to support his nuclear cost assumptions, he refers to the *worst* project he could find.
This is not fine.
https://mobile.twitter.com/EnergyJvd/status/1353622701823426560
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
