Improvements make things cheaper—better machinery, higher skilled labor, better division of labor all drive prices down. (1.xi.o.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Sometimes the cost of raw materials goes up so much that these improvements can’t compensate. (This is why SmithTweets are so pricey. You think this kind of pithy commentary grows on trees?) (1.xi.o.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Smith is really interested in watches, which is very 18thC of him. They’re his go-to example for increasingly good, increasingly inexpensive toys. It’s not clear he really approves of them. (1.xi.o.4) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Clothing manufacture hasn’t changed as rapidly, but if you look at what it was like in the 15thC you can see the improvements namely: spinning wheels, machine for winding yarn and warping loom, and fulling mills. (1.xi.o.5–12) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Sumptuary laws interfere with having a good sense of the real price of textiles. It's like drug prohibition, but for ruffles! (1.xi.o.9–10) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Yes, Elizabeth I wore knitted stockings. (You can see a pair @Hatfield_House!) but she also refused a patent to William Lee, who invented a machine to knit stockings. (1.xi.o.11) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
TL;DR: It might look like some (textile) manufactures were cheaper in the past than they are in a more advanced economy, but there's more evidence that they, like everything else, have gotten cheaper as economies get wealthier. (I.xi.o.13–15) #SmithTweets#WealthOfTweets
Improvements make things cheaper, but they also raise the rent of land, which makes landlords richer, and lets them purchase more labor. Neglect and decay, though, make everyone poorer. (1.xi.p.2–6) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Smith says landowners won't mislead the public about what’s in the public interest, because their interest aligns with the public interest. Also they're lazy and kind of dumb, because they don't have to do anything to make their money. (I.xi.p.8) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
OMG, it’s the Conclusion of the Digression concerning the Variations in the Value of Silver!! (with bonus digression about 🐄🐄💩 that digressed from the digression on silver.) (I.xi.n) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
We have to stop thinking about national wealth in terms of the amount of gold and silver we have. Precious metals are just one kind of commodity. (I.xi.n.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
(And if the past 65 pages didn't convince you, says Smith, you just wait til Book IV.) (I.xi.n.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The third sort of rude produce is the kind where human attempts to cultivate and improve it produce unpredictable results. Examples include wool and animal hides. (I.xi.m.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
It seems like the price of these should rise right along with the price of meat, but Smith says “Not so fast!” (I.xi.m.3) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The second kind of rude produce is the kind humans can produce more of in response to demand. This includes stuff like sheep, 🐄🐄, and fruits & veg that farm well.(I.xi.l.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
We don’t bother to cultivate this stuff until we reach a certain level of wealth because it reproduces well on its own. But as we get wealthier, we want more stuff and can pay for it, so it’s profitable to herd and farm these things. (I.xi.l.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Look, we aren’t complaining. We are TeamSmith. But we just want to mention, in passing, that this whole next section of #WealthOfNations is basically a Digression on the Digression on Silver. You only THINK it's about farming.(I.xi.j–m) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
When Smith says “rude produce” he doesn’t mean vegetables that question your life choices. He means plant and animal products that don’t need much technical processing to be useful. (I.xi.j) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
We, the SmithTweeters, understand you may have bigger fish to fry today than tweets about #AdamSmith and silver. We get it. But here's today's #WealthOfTweets, because--tough times or happy times--we think it's never a bad time to talk about Smith. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Wait. Still silver? Didn't Smith say he was talking about silver over 3 periods? OK FINE. FINE. It's fine. So the value of gold relative to silver was regulated by the mints of Europe until the Spaniards found those pesky American mines. (I.xi.h.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets