Gendered abuse and disinformation are terrifyingly widespread. Of our 13 subjects, 12 faced gendered abuse, and 9 faced gendered disinfo. The overwhelming majority of abuse was posted on Twitter, and targeted @KamalaHarris (78% of our data!).
Here are the most prevalent keywords supporting gendered disinformation targeting the subjects in our study, including @KamalaHarris, @IlhanMN, @GovWhitmer, and @AOC. Women were targeted with abuse across party lines.
Common disinfo narratives were racist, transphobic, or sexual. Women of color faced compounded abuse. Here you can see how users who pushed sexual narratives about @KamalaHarris also posted other abusive content. (Network by @APavliuc of @oiioxford)
The biggest challenge in identifying this content both for our team and for platforms is what we’ve dubbed “malign creativity” -- the coded language, memes, and context-based content which allow harmful posts to avoid detection.
Other challenges:
Platforms lack a coherent definition of “targeted harassment;” as a result, a lot of the abuse women face doesn’t violate terms of service and thus requires no action on the platforms’ part.
Platforms also need more intersectional expertise in content moderation, as abuse toward women, POC, and other marginalized communities too often goes undetected and unaddressed.
Unfortunately, targets bear the onus of detection and reporting. Managing an onslaught of abuse on social media requires time to block, report, and mute abusers. These burdens are discounted and affect their daily lives offline.
If this hasn’t convinced you we need a change, gendered abuse and disinfo is a national security issue. We spoke with @LetaHong, @nicoleperlroth, and @YeganehSalehi, who were targeted by Chinese, Russian, and Iranian state media with gendered disinfo and smear campaigns.
We propose several pages of solutions in the report. Most important: introducing incident reports, allowing targets of abuse to group many pieces of content/campaigns together and giving moderators more context than a single tweet/post, reducing the efficacy of malign creativity.
We also encourage lawmakers to lead by example and end the gendered rhetoric we see some politicians using in Congress and on campaigns. We also hope VAWA will be reauthorized in the new Congress and include provisions to mitigate online abuse.
Finally, too many employers, from newsrooms to universities to think tanks, do not provide enough support for women who might be exposed to abuse as a result of their work-related public engagement. It’s a critical reality of the digital age that has gone largely unacknowledged.
We looked to @Sobieraj’s Credible Threat (which you should all read) and work by @NDIWomen as well as many other trailblazing women scholars as we conducted this research. Check out our citations and support their work!
Good morning! Lots of men among my followers were giving me suggestions about how to deal with online misogynists in responses to this thread yesterday.
Here are a few reasons why it's not particularly helpful or constructive.
1. If you're a man telling a woman how to deal with online misogyny: nope. Just stop. You may as well be giving me tampon advice. Intellectually, you may think you understand what online (or real life) harassment is, but you can't understand the effect it has on the target.
2. It's highly personal; everyone deals with this differently. Not every target will choose to react the same way. Responses can range from righteous indignation to disengagement to direct response to trolls, and that's the target's choice, not yours.
Andrew is reporting from the unsanctioned protest in Moscow in support of oppositionist Alexei Navalny, arrested last week upon his return to Russia after the FSB tried to poison him.
Events like this happening all around Russia today, and police are beginning to crack down.
A friend in St. Petersburg writes, "I haven't seen such a huge group of people since 1991. A lot of people have come out [to protest] for the first time."
"A Russian politician can only be a Russian politician in Russia," says Vladimir Kara-Murza of Navalny's decision to return to Russia after recovering from the Kremlin's attempt to poison him.
@tvrain now streaming the arrest of a young female Navalny supporter at Vnukova Airport. Police dragging her away by her limbs, reporting that arrests are happening "periodically" every few minutes as Navalny supporters chant "Russia will be free"
I have received more scrutiny and been treated less politely entering the Capitol building on official business than these men who planned executions and the overthrow of our democracy.
It bears repeating over and over and over again: how many POC would have died in this circumstance?
I've also said this over and over, but it's what I keep coming back to:
Congress is a remarkably open institution. You can watch proceedings. You can literally walk into your Rep's office on any given day. It enrages me that has been jeopardized because these individuals...
I see a lot of "Putin is happy tonight" tweets and they're misleading at best. I fear that to people without all the context, they support the narrative of Russian collusion, or tacitly insinuate that Putin had a hand in today's events.
Nope. Today was uniquely American. But...
Putin is pleased to see a divided America, to see images that can fuel his whataboutist propaganda and policies, that he can use to undermine the US on the international stage for years to come. He did not engineer it, but he and other adversaries will cheer it.
Please don't @ me with your conspiracy theories. I've had enough of them for a day if not a lifetime.