Alright John. You do know that big supermarkets don't work the same as little shops? Telling your supermarket you want more UK produce isn't the same as the supply chain existing for it, as you well know. Wholesale foodmarkets are great, but they supply yer smaller shops
And yes, I know shorter supply chains are better for the environment, but they aren't what we have now, not really. A 'buy british, I'm backing Britain' movement isn't going to change the lack of supply of goods in shops if there's no infrastructure to supply them
Supermarkets aren't going to let shelves go empty. But they can't buy british produce to sell if that produce isn't there. You can't just expand production. The raw materials grow, you know. Expansion in product making isn't the same as greater utilisation of grown product either
Will we buy more british produce? Yeah, I reckon so, especially if there's nowt else to buy. But british production isn't just going to click into providing what is uneconomical to purchase and process right now. Food traditionalism isn't the same as a healthy food economy
We've made the shift from being part of a massive, harmonised food production and distribution block to being an island which will either be casting further afield for supply or trying desperately to keep food prices from rising at the same time as industry stagnates
It'd be lovely to think that just buying some butter with a union jack and a geordie cow on the wrapper will solve this problem but it won't. Organic and short supply chain stuff has always been a reality more in comfy shires than on the underheated, underpaid breadline
"Whey aye bonnie lad, my butter is udderly belter' will make a lovely James Dyson / Yeo Valley type good news story about the british food economy but it's not going to solve our problem. But then it'll be craven consumers to blame, won't it, for not worshipping british parsnips

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Brown

Mark Brown Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkOneinFour

25 Jan
It's incredible to me that we find it easier to discuss the political implications of continuing lockdowns than the political implications of 100,000 people being dead.
But the bereaved don't have a political presence, do we? Nor do those most at risk. We're a policy issue. And policy issues are difficult to discuss.
People who have died because of covid-19 are just sands in an hour glass measuring the time until we can get back to normal. It's unacceptable to be angry for those who aren't here anymore because, somehow, to speak of that result of political decisions would be uncouth, messy
Read 12 tweets
24 Jan
Being a commentator and writing opinions for money is often used as a reason why people who are commentators who write opinions for money shouldn't be held accountable for the what results from being a commentator and writing opinions for money. You are responsible for every word
With brexit, with Trump, with covid-19, whiney commentators are going back and erasing tweets, having articles removed, headlines tweaked. No. You said those things and you don't get to declare you are being mobbed by people when they want you to apologise for being wrong.
You make your living based on the assrtion that what you say matters. Then, when it turns out you were wrong, you declare that what you write and broadcast doesn't matter. It does. Anything any of us write or say helps shape reality. Take responsibility. Take ownership.
Read 6 tweets
18 Jan
Know what? Looking at amount of people who have died from Covid-19 in the UK, abject failure to take steps to prevent this, refusal to make it possible for people to be safe and muddled triangulation of policy against imagined public opinion: it does matter who is in government
'Ah, Mark, nobody could have prepared for this, it's unprecedented' A better government could have been better unprepared and could have taken action based on not being fucking shit at things that didn't involve playing to their own gallery like shit toastmasters at a charity do
Every government fails in ways that are both universal and predictable and in ways that are idiosyncratic and theirs alone. Other governments have made their own mistakes. But this government have made mistakes that are entirely their own. They have failed at using the state
Read 4 tweets
18 Jan
I think there's a couple of things here. If your history goes working class, then parents not, then you not, it doesn't necessarily follow you are more secure than your parents. Or that you have joined a settled, middle class world. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I'll be the first to say that I don't really 'get' middle class people. I really don't. So I'm just guessing about their motivations. Access to capital is for me one of the big things where class is a divider when young, but sometimes less so when people are my parents age
When I was in my 20s I couldn't understand where people of a similar ages money came from. There was a similar perplexity at my lack of it. I went from working in social care to university with no saving and stuff. But even then my dad, who was unemployed paid my rent for a year
Read 16 tweets
17 Jan
"Pandemics are by definition situations where infectious diseases outstrip capacity of our modes of social organisation to control their transmission. The built environment we need to reduce transmission of this potentially lethal virus doesn’t exist yet" tribunemag.co.uk/2021/01/in-def…
We have a virus which is transmitted in certain ways. Then we have the disease the virus causes, the effect of which is influenced by numerous factors of social organisation. Covid-19 is ripping through the world because we are not changing things needed to prevent both
The reason why covid-19 is a pandemic is because the way we organise our world is what this particular mutation fitted to spread easily. In the UK we have lost so many because we have held back from change because those who make decisions assumed change needed is harder than loss
Read 6 tweets
12 Jan
You know the shitty free school meal scandal? Companies taking contracts like that to offer a service to the public in need used to bank on those people being so invisible they'd never get a complaint out into general public knowledge. This is now an epic miscalculation.
Everything that is bad about the web is also what's good about the web. The web and social media allow the very quick aggregation of people's experiences as they occur and then the quick dissemination of the things aggregated. This changes things greatly
Those paltry free school meals parcels seemed to be acceptable to send out to company because 1) the people commissioning them and the people receiving them were once shielded from each other 2) the people commissioning them would in the past never seen the end product
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!