By "multiple examples," D'Souza means ... two.

And for his "examples" he names historians who actually have addressed Democrats' past support for slavery, segregation, racial terrorism and lynching -- Eric Foner and Robert Dallek.

Let's take a look!
Here's the podcast, and you should listen, if only to see D'Souza claim that he's not going to engage in credentialism before mocking me for attending a state school for my undergrad and a lesser Ivy for my PhD (around 49:00)

True? #GoHeels #Cornell

rumble.com/vd94zj-erasing…
Now, if you missed it, here are some of the examples I and others provided of "progressive textbooks" that note the simple fact that Democrats were the party of slavery and segregation.

In response to that list, D'Souza has provided two names ... one of whom is on that list:

Eric Foner, the historian who said the Klan was "a military arm of the Democratic Party."
The other is Robert Dallek, whose biography of FDR -- according to D'Souza -- hides FDR's refusal to push for anti-lynching laws and Southern Dems' racism.

These are a few passages from it. The first two on FDR's cowardice on lynching; the third is about Sen. E.D. Smith (D-SC).
So ... that's the big response.

Two historians who actually do the very thing he insists none of us do.

Once again, the patented D'Souza combination of ignorance and arrogance comes through. It never fails, though he always does.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin M. Kruse

Kevin M. Kruse Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KevinMKruse

26 Jan
🚨🚨🚨WARNING: This is not for the faint of heart! 🚨🚨🚨

Dinesh will sneer about the fact that I went to a public university as an undergrad.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!!
Did he delete it, or did Twitter take it down because he went FULL SAVAGE on me for getting my PhD at a “lesser Ivy”? Image
Yep, deleted.

Here it is for posterity. Image
Read 4 tweets
23 Jan
In case you missed it, my creepy stalker @DineshDSouza is back, repeating his bizarre claim that "progressive historians" never write about how the Democratic Party was the party of slavery, segregation and white supremacy.

Let's all dig in on this one.

It's a laughable claim, as anyone who took US history in college or even high school knows, but it seems D'Souza never did that.

He's been pushing it for years, and whenever I ask him for examples -- like this thread from July 2018 -- he runs away.

D'Souza has repeatedly promised he'll show examples of this trend he insists is incredibly widespread -- examples that are surely at his fingertips! -- but it's been years now.

(He *does* apparently have plenty time to tell everyone else in his replies how very important he is.)
Read 14 tweets
23 Jan
It’s just so very sad. Image
So, so, so very sad. Image
So, so, so desperately sad. Image
Read 4 tweets
18 Jan
This is somehow even worse than I expected it to be.
I mean, check out these dire threats to America ... slavery, fascism, communism and (squints) progressivism and identity politics?
The idea that affirmative action was somehow a repudiation of King's vision -- WHEN MLK EXPLICITLY ENDORSED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND CHARACTERIZED AS AN EXTENSION OF THE MOVEMENT -- is just insanely stupid.

And to release this ahistorical garbage on MLK Day? Goddamn.
Read 5 tweets
17 Jan
LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Read 5 tweets
4 Jan
The lesson that Nixon took from Ford’s pardon was his famous line to David Frost: "When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal."

Many of his successors took the same lesson.
As @julianzelizer and I noted here, Ford’s pardon — which he sincerely, I think, believed was necessary for the nation — set a horrid precedent for the presidency.

usatoday.com/story/opinion/…
It wasn’t an automatic shift. Indeed, as I detailed in my chapter in this volume, Jimmy Carter went to great lengths — even testifying before Congress in one inquiry — to show he was not above the law.

thenewpress.com/books/presiden…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!