Update from the European Commission: they are indeed considering export notifications for vaccines.
"This is not about blocking, this is about knowing what the companies will export,” says a spokesman.
But what if the EU doesn’t like the information that has been notified?
The spokesman will not elaborate at this time about whether the export notification could then result in an export restriction.
But based on what they’re saying (and also what national ministers are saying), that does seem to be the plan. Otherwise what’s the point of notifying?
“The EU and others helped with money. Large sums were invested to build research capacities and production facilities early...and now the companies must deliver.”
“[The pharma giants] must honour their obligations. And this is why we will set up a vaccine export transparency mechanism. Europe is determined to contribute to this global common good, but it also means business,” Von Der Leyen said.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Update from MEP @peterliese, health spokesman for the largest party in the EU Parliament (thread):
He maintains #AstraZeneca is treating people in EU as "2nd class citizens" and that doses have gone from the EU to the UK.
"They gave 3 different explanations in less than a week"
Carrot: He's says objections are with AZ behaviour, not vaccine's efficacy
"There's been a lot of talk about AZ being a bad vaccine - very strange fake news in German media. It's definitely not true"
"If someone offered me AZ, and it’s my turn, I wouldn’t hesitate for a minute"
“The AstraZeneca vaccine has not as good data as the vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna but still it is a good vaccine. In October, we would have been happy to have a vaccine that has an efficiency well above 50%."
Barnstorming press conference from EU Health Commissioner @SKyriakidesEU, responding to #AstraZeneca suggestion UK gets vaccine priority because it signed deal earlier.
"In our contract it is not specified any country, or the UK, has priority because it signed earlier."
"Let me be crystal clear: the 27 EU member states are united AstraZeneca needs to deliver on its commitments in our agreement. We are in a pandemic."
"The view that the company is not obliged to deliver because we signed a best effort agreement is neither correct or acceptable."
"We reject the logic of first-come-first-served. That may work at the nieghbourhood butchers, but not in contracts," says the EU's health chief.
"There is no priority clause in the advance purchase agreement, and no hierarchy of the 4 production plants - 2 in EU and 2 in UK."
The EU Commission says that it helped finance the development of the #AstraZeneca#COVID19, and in return it was supposed to get guaranteed access to 300m doses.
Now, the Commission suggests those doses appear to have been given to someone else.
The EU may prevent Pharma companies from exporting vaccines made in facilities in EU countries that have been promised to the EU.
Questions are also being asked why AZ didn't apply for EU authorisation until 12 January. EU approval expected Friday.
Commission President @vonderleyen told #Davos2021 this morning the pharma companies "must honour their obligations".
But what are those obligations? We don't know exactly because neither EU or UK are making these contracts public.
EU lawmakers are furious with #AstraZeneca today. Some suspect that politics are behind company saying it will deliver less vaccines than promised to EU in coming weeks.
German centre-right MEP (and doctor) Peter Liese asked today why deliveries to EU are impacted but not to UK.
Belgian PM @alexanderdecroo has tonight announced a ban on non-essential international travel, starting Wednesday 27 January and lasting until 1 March.
People coming in to or leaving Belgium will need to be doing so for one of these essential reasons: brusselstimes.com/news/belgium-a…
At the same time, the PM announced a schedule for a relaxation of Belgium’s 2nd lockdown, in place since 2 November.
“The coronavirus situation in our country has stabilised,” he said. “Our figures are better than in most other countries in Europe, thanks to our perseverance.”
“Let this be clear: we are not building a wall around our country,” De Croo says. “Coming and going is still possible, but there will have to be a good reason.”
This could throw both Commission's procurement process and EMA's approval process into crisis.
It's essentially a gentleman's agreement not to pre-empt those two EU-level processes. Now that one country has broken ranks, will others follow?
Germany already flirted with idea.
I was told that at last night's #EUCO video summit all prime ministers and presidents expressed continued support for the Commission's joint procurement and the EMA's regulatory independence. Even Orban 🤷♂️.