Tony Yates Profile picture
26 Jan, 42 tweets, 7 min read
@bbclaurak asks what went wrong. Many things....
1. The government and particularly the PM was complacent in getting into gear as the virus gathered pace in China and Italy.
2. The March lockdown came far too late. A fault that may lie with the govt and the scientists advising; perhaps the latter were incorrectly assuming a lockdown would not be agreed to and so did not recommend it early enough.
3. The first lockdown was arguably too stringent and inefficient, and possibly even too long. IMO it was a reasonable precautionary design. But a case can be made.
4. Test trace isolate was a total disaster. Including the hiccoughs developing the app[s], and the non digital side of the operation. Time spent lockdown, and enjoying low transmission in Summer, was wasted.
5. Senior figures gave terrible messages of compacency early on by failing to socially distance in front of the camera, and protect themselves, threatening the continuity of the power to make decisions as the PM succumbed.
6. The govt risked a collapse of consent for the lockdown in failing to sack Cummings, and being complicit in the lies about his lack of compliance with the regulations. Luckily this collapse did not happen, but it may yet come to bite.
7. Instead of using the Summer to build test/trace/isolate, there was a catastrophically bad shift in messaging urging people to go back to work, and even subsidizing some risky activities like eating out.
8. The November lockdown came too late, many weeks after the SAGE 21 September recommendation.
9. That lockdown was unwound too much, too early, and in particular the determination to encourage mixing at Christmas and New Year boosted infections and created the 3rd wave.
10. And of course the current lockdown began too late. Punctuated by the chaos of sending primary kids to school for one day, subsequently closing.
11. Persistent failure to properly finance self-isolation for those who test positive.
12. Allowing universities to encourage students back to campus [most likely so that they could collect rent and fees from the students].
13. Aggravating the financial uncertainty for firms and individuals by making the support schemes such that they end at cliff edges, to be revised at short notice, rather than tying them to the state of the virus.
14. Compounding the uncertainty of covid by keeping open the possibility of No Deal until the last minute, when there was the option of settling earlier, or negotiating an extension to the transition.
15. General failure to appreciate the broad lack of a trade off between the economy and the virus; a view that tilted policy most recently before the November lockdown.
16. Witty mentions the 'learning' that took place over the usefulness of masks, and the importance of asymptomatic transmission. I need convincing that in the face of uncertainty the precautionary approach was to recommend masks and assume the worst about transmission.
17. Haphazard and apparently corrupt procurement procedures for PPE, documented so graphically by @JolyonMaugham and the @GoodLawProject
18. Inappropriate involvement in the officially independent processes of SAGE with Cummings participating in the meetings.
19. Failure to interdict foreign travellers properly and put in place proper testing and quarantining measures, that worked so well in the success countries. [Still ongoing].
20. Many small but significant errors during the period of regionally differentiated lockdowns, including: 1) inadequate financial compensation [remember @AndyBurnhamGM 's stand off] 2) failure to share local data on infections [remember Leicester]
21. The pre November lockdown powerpoints as Gupta presented to Sunak and Johnson... access to someone who had made multiple bad calls on the virus, circumventing SAGE synthesis of the science.
22. The 'design a new ventilator from scratch' saga. Which yielded no ventilators.
23. Giving up on testing and tracing very early on in the pandemic. [Treating this as separate from the failure to build capacity between the first and second lockdowns].
24. Perhaps not a distinct failure, but.... not attempting 0 covid over the late Spring/Summer period.
25. Awful Comms failures, briefing possible future changes in policy via trial balloons launched by Peston, Kuenssberg, The Telegraph, Mail and other friendly outlets.
26. Much suffering caused early on by the failure to encourage people into hospitals in the first lockdown.
27. Bit cheeky, but will lodge as a line item a failure to listen to me and others calling for a Centre for Econ and Epidemiology to do transparent, joined up econ and epi analysis and forecasting.... theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
28. Circling back a bit over old ground, but giving weight to the argument 1) that there would be lockdown fatigue [ok a fair error in hindsight] but 2) that if there was going to be fatigue you should lock down later! [In fact opposite is the case].
29. Pouring scorn on a Labour policy suggestion that became govt policy soon afterwards, namely the November lockdown.
30. Clearing hospitals of old patients back into care homes, and failing to protect care homes early on. Subsequently lying about when this was done and blaming care homes for the disaster.
31. Putting Brexit/nationalism ahead of our citizens by opting out of the EU equipment procurement plan, and then lying about having done so afterwards.
32. Perhaps this, although some of this is scientific hindsight?:
33. Threatening some schools with legal action if they did not stay open in Dec, in the face of rising infections and the inevitability of closure, amidst incorrect binary remarks that 'schools are safe'.
34. Heavy handedness in regulations and policing regarding outdoor, distanced activities which are extremely low risk.
35. A torrent of lies and dissembling and nonsense from politicians, not necessarily amounting to a 'thing' that went wrong, contributing directly, but given that the whole strategy relies on consent [to if push came to shove unenforceable lockdowns], potential disasters...
...including today from Jenrick: [sic] 'there will come a time when we can look back and ask with hindsight what we could have done better, but that time is not now'
..this being obvs bollocks, since as @xtophercook pointed out the main need to identify mistakes and correct them is to make policy better now, when it can make a difference; plus there are also errors clear at the time, not just with hindsight, see most of 1-34 above.
37. Others may correct me on this but I think that PPE shortages, and the improvization this necessitated, led to the deaths of healthworkers in the early phase of the pandemic.
Not a separate offence, but goes under 36 - lying - but this is an example. Several times the govt pointedly ignored its scientific advice, most notably, the SAGE 21 September call for a lockdown:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tony Yates

Tony Yates Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @t0nyyates

28 Jan
The fuel injected Brexiter comments on the EU's vaccine problems miss many points.
1) no-one wanted to get out of the EU or the single market to protect ourselves better against a pandemic. See Brexit Tory controlled government policy 2016-2020 regarding the NHS and pandemic preparedness.
2) we could have, and, perhaps thanks to the need to genuflect to nationalists, or out of pragmatic needs, chosen to go our own way on procurement even within the EU.
Read 11 tweets
28 Jan
1. IMO there is a very clear near-term benefit to not exporting vaccines. Fewer UK people die/left with long covid, travel restrictions excepted, life returns to normal faster.
2. The cost benefit analysis in the longer term is less clear cut; the EU could retalliate during the endless vaccine tweak and top-up phase. Or with other measures.
3. In general, vaccine nationalism - like any trade nationalism - is a bad thing. Cooperation better. Unvaccinated foreigners will infect us and incubate mutations that infect us and render our clung onto domestic vaccines obsolete faster.
Read 7 tweets
26 Jan
Also interesting is how one country choosing not or unable to control the virus creates negative spillovers [raising the chance of generating a new more malign variant] for other countries.
How would you combat this? Carrots and sticks for those choosing not to control the virus [sanctions, conditional aid]; aid for those unable to control it.
Another interesting issue arises that if you pursued a vaccine nationalist strategy to the great detriment of a country you are connected to this could rebound on you and others by allowing new variants to incubate and eventually unravel your suppression strategy.
Read 4 tweets
26 Jan
Not always the mouthpiece of govt; sometimes the mouthpiece of other anonymous persons working for interested parties. Why not wait until you have a corroborated and sourced story weighing it all up and then write that?
Like an economist tweeting 'I've just opened Matlab and initialised some parametes and matrix entries!' 'Anonymous sources say there might indeed be a paper here'.
I don't understand Robert's incentives. He's at the top of his game. A superstar. Book deals when he feels like it. Pime time tv shows when he wants on what he wants. Why bother with this. There is no race that needs to be won that these 'get there first' tweets can help.
Read 4 tweets
24 Jan
In a parallel world, the Virus Policy Commitee of the Centre for Economics and Epidemiology has just voted options for vaccine prioritization and trajectories for lockdown release.
The voting helped focus Government and 'Covid Recovery Group' minds on the consequences of early relaxations, given stark forecasts for the number that would die or be left long term disabled by covid under each of the options.
Although the government was left to choose its own vaccination and lockdown policy, and the VPC's votes were advisory only, the death numbers printed in black and white made it hard for the government to choose the high numbers of deaths.
Read 4 tweets
24 Jan
‘Sociologists have no compelling theory of society’.... ‘philosophers have no compelling theory of knowledge’.... ‘theologians have no compelling theory of religion’... send tweet
For clarity... given some of the replies. I don't actually believe any of those statements. They just illustrate the vacuity of someone [like me] who is obviously not from those disciplines and demonstrates no history of grappling with primary contributions, tweeting out.
'finance has no compelling theory of finance'.... 'banking has no compelling theory of banks'.... 'anthropology has no compelling theory of human behaviour'.... this is fun!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!