According to the first Sikh Guru, Guru Nanak: "The lowliest of the lowly, the lowest of the low born, Nanak seeks their company. The friendship of great is in vain. For, where the weak are cared for, there Thy Mercy rains."
With the advent of the tenth Guru, Gobind Singh, & his establishment of the Khalsa, the original intent of Guru Nanak was finally fulfilled. The downtrodden embraced a Panth — path — in which they will never be victims, always be victorious, & constantly fight for the oppressed.
Guru Gobind Singh did this by uniting Panth & Granth — text — in a body called the Khalsa (sovereign) which could enrich the world at large.
In 1699, Guru Gobind Singh stood before tens of thousands of his followers who had traveled from far & wide to assemble at...
... Anandpur Sahib, the city originally planned by his father in 1665. Speaking to the assembly, he began by calling for five followers to volunteer their heads in sacrifice. He took the first volunteer inside his tent & returned, alone, carrying a sword covered in blood.
He requested another volunteer & repeated this process until, at last, he returned with all five, alive but now dressed as kings in turbans.
The five came from diverse castes & far-flung geographical regions.
One was from Delhi, one from Gujarat, one from Karnataka, one from Lahore, & one from Orissa. Four of them were originally members of the oppressed classes. Now, however, the differences & divisions of their old identities were to be abandoned as the Guru stripped them of...
... their caste names and baptized them all as “Singh” (lion). Instead of “worms” these men were to be lions.
“From now on, you have become casteless,” declared the Guru. In a single statement, he upheld the equality of men & women, the shared humanity of all people, the plight of the poor, & the distinctiveness of the Sikh religion.
He further declared: "No ritual, either Hindu or Muslim, will you perform and believe in superstition of no kind, but only in one God who is the Master & the Protector of all, the only Creator and Destroyer. In your new order, the lowest will rank with the highest & each...
... will be to the other a brother.... Women shall be equal of men in every way.... Serve the poor without distinction of caste, color, country, or creed. My Khalsa shall always defend the poor."
Then the Guru bowed, submitted himself to the five, & asked them to similarly anoint him a “Singh.” He had so much faith in the commitment of the Khalsa that he surrendered himself to the institution.
“Gobind exclaimed that the lowly should be raised, & that hereafter the despised should dwell next to himself,” writes Cunningham. In 1499, Guru Nanak declared that God’s path required seeking the company of the low born.
Occurring exactly 200 years after Guru Nanak began his mission, the establishment of the Khalsa was a graduation ceremony of summa cum laude students. As Cunningham states, “It was reserved for Nanak to perceive the true principles of reform, & to lay those broad foundations...
... which enabled his successor Gobind to fire the minds of his countrymen with a new nationality, & to give practical effect to the doctrine that the lowest is equal with the highest, in race as in creed, in political rights as in religious hopes.”
And, in context of the #RepublicDay2021#FarmersProtest, it's important to note that, even as the #NishanSahib was raised at #LalQila, protestors — many of whom were carrying the Indian tricolor themselves — left the national flag untouched & respected.
"The inspiration for the protesters’ act comes from Baghel Singh, the Sikh general who had hoisted the flag at Red Fort after emerging victorious in his conflict against Mughals."
#NishanSahib, flying over #LalQila, historically represents the spirt of the #Khalsa as they fought — like underdogs — against an oppressive empire. No matter who the ruling elite is, the spirit of Sikhism teaches it is the duty of the Khalsa to oppose oppressors.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I just, today, received an invitation by a Pakistan High Commission in an English-speaking country to participate in a seminar. I was humbled & honored. I declined it.
I am independent. I am non-partisan — both in my home country of the USA and in terms of any international action. On principle, ideologically, I will never participate in any event hosted by or collaborate with any political party or government — whether in America or abroad.
I'm an American citizen. I will have nothing to do with the Republican Party or the Democratic Party — or any other party in my country. And I will certainly have nothing to do with any non-US political party. I view it as foreign interference.
"As the years go by, those who champion the causes of others, particularly those of a demonised minority, will find themselves accused of being prejudiced, of having an agenda, of seeking to advance their careers, and of 'playing politics'."
"And if you insist on making something like an investigation into the 2002 Gujarat riots part of your life’s work, you will repeatedly, aggressively, be asked: 'Why won’t you let bygones be bygones? Why won’t you let people move on? Why do you have to be so negative?'"
"Every riot, every act of violence we have worked so hard to ignore, to 'get over' without a moment’s reflection or any attempt to seek understanding and reconciliation, has made us more debased as a society. The mob now believes it can act with impunity."
I'm humbled & honored by the chance to share with you some of the affirmations of my journalism & analysis from various reputable sources. My gratitude.
I was raised as a Christian fundamentalist and used to write - in full belief - in support of basing society on the laws of the Torah (first five books) of the Bible.
I was taught that the Confederacy (the pro-slavery rebels of the southern US) were the “right” side. I remember my paternal grandfather (who was later convicted as a child molester) praising me for articles arguing as much. I remember my family flying a Confederate flag.
I once wrote supremacist, homophobic, Islamophobic, and even anti-Semitic blogs, arguing a religious nationalist ideology that was patriarchal, discriminatory, and outright offensive.
Dear all, I've taken cognizance of all the evidence surrounding alleged Hindutva participation in the Wednesday insurrection. My conclusion? There's not much and it's not worth getting distracted from the bigger picture.
1) An Indian Christian raised an Indian flag. Yes, I think it's safe to conclude that's a sign of Indian nationalists backing Trump. There's some circumstantial evidence suggesting he's associated with Sanghis. But it's not significant.
2) A man, apparently a "Hemant Bhatt" from New Jersey, joined the rally. But there's no obvious connection between him and Hindutva. And the presence of a single individual is not significant.
I don’t like Biden. I didn’t vote for him. I have no faith he will end the American war machine.
Harris is a cop with a horrible history.
But Biden-Harris won.
Invading the Capitol, in insurrection, is not only despicable but gives more excuse for the Fed to gut our rights.
Trump was “not my president.”
But he did win, according to the rules of the system.
Biden is “not my president.”
But he also won.
Denying democratic results will only result in chaos in the country and the State ramping up domestic tyranny.
Democrat or Republican, the fundamental flaw of every President for decades has been advancing the agenda of the military-industrial complex. America’s constant wars of foreign aggression can be linked to virtually every major domestic problem in the country today.