With large percentages of healthcare workers opting not to receive the vaccine, I called my son’s orthodontist and asked if their assistants were vaccinated ahead of his appointment this week
They said HIPA prevented them from disclosing that info
(THREAD)
(2) The ortho office said they couldn’t require the assistants to get the vaccine or disclose whether they had received it.
And while I get that, I’m starting to wonder how we are ever going to make it safe enough out there that people can get the healthcare they need.
(3) Utah is running a 20% daily average positive rate, and 25% of the population can’t be vaccinated because they are under 16.
Given current allotments, we’ll only be able to vaccinate the over 70 population for the next 3-4 weeks and people over 65 could take another month.
(4) Meanwhile, as a high risk household, we’ve been in virtual lockdown for 314 days.
We’ve had to take significant risks just to seek essential healthcare and treatment while Republicans allow the virus to rampage through the state.
When will it ever be safe for us again?
Obviously, I meant HIPAA. Apologies to all the HR professionals out there who are cringing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In today's #ThursdayThread, we're looking more closely at the Dem strategy moving forward. Will Democrats continue to fall for promises from the other side of the aisle or will they govern with the power of the mandate they've been given?
(2) There are some good indications that Schumer and Senate Democrats outmaneuvered Mitch McConnell quite neatly on the filibuster issue earlier this week and that they plan to move forward on stimulus without regard to GOP dissent.
(3) It's important to note that as much as the wins in Georgia provided Dems control of the Senate, they hold the slimmest of majorities in both chambers and that hampers their agenda.
Because of the filibuster, passing legislation requires 60 votes.
What if it’s more like big tobacco where the industry obscured the fact that their product was dangerous for decades and now can be held responsible for the effects of continuing to market something dangerous to the public under false pretenses.
Hell, even alcohol has warning labels about health risks. And strict rules about who, where, and how they can market their product to the public.
Where’s the warning for Fox News?
I don’t know ANY industry where you can market something with demonstrably false claims. In other industries you’d face fines from the federal government for misleading the public about your product. (Think FDA, EPA enforcement, etc). It should be the same for media.
This #thursdaymorning we're taking a closer look at some of Trump's last-minute directives extending secret service protection to his family and members of his administration.
(2) To be clear, these sorts of extensions are not unprecedented, but presidents in the past such as Bush and Obama have only extended secret service protection to teenage and college-age children, not full-grown adults and their families.
(3) The cost to taxpayers for 24-hour protection details for the next six months for such a large group will likely be enormous, especially given the family's lifestyle and extensive travel.
It's estimated theTrumps took 4,500 trips between 2017-2019.
As the wheels of justice grind forward and we prepare for Biden to take office, it's worthwhile to get a bird's eye view of the mess we still have to clean up.
Who was responsible for the Capitol Riots and how will we hold them accountable?
Here's what we know so far.
(THREAD)
(2) First off, the arrests have really ramped up in the last few days. More than 100 have been arrested for their role in the Capitol Riots, but there are 200 or more open case files.
Prosecutors have been clear they plan to charge many with felonies.
This #SundayMorning we're asking ourselves...
coup or no coup?
That is the question.
The next 30 days loom before us.
Will Trump's attempts to install himself as a dictator succeed?
(THREAD) theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
(2) Now that Trump's legal options have run out & the electoral college has voted to cement Biden's victory, Trump's options to overturn a fair election have narrowed.
This week, Flynn floated imposing martial law, the very definition of a military coup.
This #SundayMorning we're asking what can be done about House Republicans who signed onto a lawsuit to overturn an election and install Trump as a de facto dictator.
Isn't this sedition? Do Dems have recourse to punish an obvious attempt to undermine the constitution?
(THREAD)
(2) First off, it's been absolutely terrifying to watch a majority of House Republicans sign on to essentially overturn an election and install a dictator. I mean I thought they couldn't surprise me anymore but they succeeded with this seditious nonsense.