I am so privileged to have been vaccinated today. We are so privileged by science to have it available. With two 9/11 cancers, one 9/11 heart condition & a history of respiratory issues, I am a festival of preexisting conditions & a mark for this virus. I am relieved and grateful Image
I wish for a more equitable process of vaccination, which would require the state to prioritize based on vulnerability. They didn't gather that data beyond the obvious: age + a list of preexisting conditions. But I am glad many people are getting the shot. The more, the better!
I just happened into one vaccination site's schedule yesterday, found appointments, and grabbed one. Minutes later, they were all gone. It's so random still. I hope it won't be difficult to get my second shot on time.
In the event, the Middlesex County, NJ, health officials ran a very well-organized operation: from standing in line to getting the shot was just a half-hour.
The line around me was predominately white, which is a huge problem on so many levels.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Jarvis

Jeff Jarvis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jeffjarvis

28 Jan
Here's an unintended consequence from Facebook's independent Oversight Board: Does it make Facebook's judgment look good by comparison?
1/
oversightboard.com/news/165523235…
The key issue the Board's decisions raise for me is the set of laws it is interpreting and enforcing. The decisions, to me, expose the weakness in that set of statutes, giving the Board no higher principles to call upon. 2/
In one case, the Board allows what seems to be an insult to Muslim men as a group. In another, it disallows an insult to Azerbaijanis. Part of the problem is whether things rise to "hate speech" under FB's statutes. If FB had a standard of respect instead, both should go. 3/
Read 14 tweets
26 Jan
So now instead of paying attention to the deviant Trump, TV news is paying attention to his deviant conspirators. TV should be covering the views & needs of the *majority* who defeated him, including voices too long not heard in mass media. Media's worldview is deviant. Damnit.
By covering the deviants so much, TV news gives them exactly what they want: attention, amplifying their deviant conspiracies. By covering deviance over the majority, TV paints the entire nation as deviant. So the deviants set the agenda. The deviants win.
If you're wondering, I'm watching MSNBC this morning.
Read 6 tweets
19 Jan
This canceling of Trumpists is all well & good. But we in journalism must grapple with our devil & clean our house.
What is to be done about Fox & its claim to journalism?
Should we not shun & shame Murdoch's forces for the damage they have done to news & the nation? 1/ Image
What would it mean to shun Murdoch's Fox from journalism? First, we need to draw up an indictment for its crimes & their damage; media must report on media. Then shouldn't we refuse them a seat in every respectable news group, starting with the @RTDNA (née RTNDA) & @ONA? 2/
Respectable news organizations and their journalists should refuse to appear on Fox. (I turned them down not long ago.) J-schools should teach lapses of journalistic ethics & quality and start with receipts from Fox as case studies. 3/
Read 7 tweets
18 Jan
Oh, my. Former FT Editor @lionelbarber defends bothsideism, impartiality, objectivity and other recent journalistic tradition.
persuasion.community/p/lionel-barbe…
In it, @lionelbarber laments the loss of trust in Walter Cronkite; "newspaper of record." That was trust imagined by the institution & limited to white privilege & power. Now, on the net, we hear people never included in the institution, who never trusted it. See: #BLM, #metoo
Barber quotes @WesleyLowery, which is good, but misses his point: that these institutional notions of objectivity, impartiality, trust were fictions those in power told themselves because they had the power to do so. It was journalism's fatal tautology. 3/
Read 21 tweets
16 Jan
No, @TiffanyDCross, please don't apologize for being on Twitter. I am grateful you are there.
The "big social" your guest demonizes also made #BLM and #metoo possible because big, white, old, mass media did not.
Note both are built on the same, attention-based business model.
Note also that moral panic about social media is unhelpful as it finds an easy villain -- "big social" -- when big media are also culpable (see below). It also distracts us from society's true problem: underlying racism.
ft.com/content/b47b27…
Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
Watching right now. My Rep, @Malinowski, begins by recounting Jan. 6.
Yow. @Malinowski came to the Capitol to thank police there. One said he is also in the Army National Guard and that men in his unit this week said they thought Jan. 6 was "a fake."
.@Malinsowski said the mistake is too common in history: not believing people will do what they say they will do.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!