Paul has a funny question, so let's look at the epic short squeezes and artificial market cap created. You're in for a few surprises. 1st, we're all talking about GameStop.
Chart is for Frankfurt trading. Mkt Cap 15bn€, so +14.7bn€ since the meteoric rise.
Some of you probably remember the epic Volskwagen short squeeze created by Porsche. Full story there ft.com/content/0a58b6…
Nice chart, hey ! Price at 714€, that's 269bn€ created ! WOW.
But there is BETTER
And now we turn to my favorite babies, EU banks. Meet Bankia: it was put into "resolution" and hybrids converted 2 equity b4 the IPO. For some reason there was a massive short squeeze before hybrids could sell.
From 140 to 1.3 that's 428bn€ of paper money!
But there's BETTER
AIB ! Also in resolution, government had 99%+ but a tiny float still out there - poor shorts. And boy, that was a short squeeze. the bank was literally worth 0 and went all the way up to.... 58bn ! Ok, that's less than Bankia, but crazier because the real value was 100% clear
By the way, none of those calculations mean anything, they're just fun
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A thread on the German data on the efficiency of the AstraZeneca vaccine because I’m reading a lot of VERY bad takes. Is there any kind of statistical significance on the 6.9% efficiency? Is it total crap? It’s not that simple as I’ll try to show.
First of all, forget the absurd “Confidence interval” – it’s useless and based on assumptions that are almost by definition false. So let’s look at this problem differently.
The basic data is this 5829 ppl in the control group, 5807 in the vaccine group, of which 319 and 341 above 65. But the major problem is this: the control group had only case over 65 (101 in total). What is the implication of this surprising number?
Cyprus is truly a fascinating country. Have you heard of the ESTIA scheme? What is happening there is extraordinary. A quick thread.
The general idea of the scheme is great! The purpose is "to deliver a socially acceptable and financially sustainable restructuring solution to vulnerable borrowers who have mortgaged their primary residence".
Indeed, that sounds like a great idea. But how ?
Very straightforward.
"The government subsidizes part of the repayment instalments by 1/3 of the restructured loan."
It took me a while to write this thread about the ECB’s Financial Stability Review, but that is because (thanks to @michaelsteen and his great team), I got clarifications on some important points.
A lot has been said already, so I’ll try to focus on items which are not obvious.
On the macro front, I will just mention this chart, which looks at the phase-out of measures I believe are the most important for GDP/Banks: in the periphery Spain looks better than Italy, in Core, Germany is stronger.
But there are dozens of other interesting charts in the report, there is just no point reproducing them here. Let’s look at banks, now.
We all know one reason banks are doing well since the beginning of the Covid crisis is that so much has been swept under the rug with guarantees and moratoriums.
So it’s great to actually have a look at what is hidden under that carpet! Thanks, EBA.
Let’s start with the basics: the numbers, in % of loan book. And the differences in the EU are huge.
THE GOLDEN CARPET AWARD GOES TO CYPRUS
(And it's not even close even if Portugal, Hungary or a few others are really worrying.)
But one should be careful: EBA moratorium are not the only measures, some banks took measures that were not “EBA compliant”. Is this significant? Well, in some countries it’s up to 40% of all Covid measures.
Indeed, this strange phenomenon turned out to be the key to unlock one of the biggest mysteries of the universe: the wave-particle duality!
But it took a while to get there, because, unlike reflection or refraction, diffraction is hard to observe.
Let’s start with the basics: a shadow. Surely, that’s how you think a shadow works. The shape of the shadow is exactly the shape of the object because light travels in straight lines.