It was with sadness that I chose to stop doing my long-form threads here at Twitter, but I know those of you who follow my work understand why and I won't discuss that any further. I am sharing formally that there will be no more post here.
2) Strangely, as soon as I stopped posting my normal stuff here, my account not only stopped losing followers but began to gain a few, again. Now there's a go figure, eh? I take it from that that obedience is rewarded. I'm pretty sure about that, actually.
3) I learned a new rule. Power can be probed. It can be tested. So, not having anything to lose, my next decision as you can see right now, is to continue to play with the rules of power, here. I am posting over at Gab and have the same name there as here.
4) With just that much in place, I think I'll post something light here every once in a while, always working hard to be obedient and compliant. But obedient and compliant of what, exactly? Two things. The stated rules here and my guess at the unstated rules.
5) A few days work has shown both that Gab's design is not as rich as here, and its interface not as well designed. Also, imagine the strain on their servers of millions of us migrating there over a period of days. I will surely give them time.
6) I know, that was a non-sequitur. It connects somehow, but I won't worry about that. What I will do here, is simply post things randomly until they shut me down, if they do. I want to share a list of things I won't be doing.
7) As I said, no more long-form threads. Also, no more hashtags. No more links, at all. No more direct discussion of things that I believe Twitter's controllers do not approve of. Note the word direct. I won't talk about indirect today. Soon enough I may.
8) I won't be responding to comments any more, nor making any of my own on other peoples' postings. I won't be retweeting, at all. And no participation in DM rooms, either. Especially not that. Basically, I have to stop passing notes in class, you know? Principal says.
9) I hope that's helpful, for those of you still here until we're expelled from school completely. Oh, did I mention that I'm at Gab under the same name as here?
Short thread ends at #9.
And nary a hashtag anywhere. Ha!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Life often gives us signs and signals, and no matter how wrongly we may interpret them - and we truly do often misinterpret - we must still listen anyway.
2) By nature I am the most disobedient man you'll ever meet. When given a command my true nature is to do the opposite. When asked, politely, I behave very differently. My inclination is to say yes, wherever I possibly may. Commands, different story.
3) But this newly born day - it's just after midnight by not quite an hour yet - I received a crystal clear command from the Big Tech overlords and I have obeyed. One of the signals is that I am down about 1,400 followers over the past 6 hours or so. How about that?
“If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.”
Yeah. I watched the original Star Wars movie in the theaters when it came out, and I can't tell you how many times I went.
2) I had no idea back then that I'd ever become a swordsman. Watching that scene today, I'm both impressed with the quality of the fighting, as well as cynical about filmed swordsmanship vs the real thing. Still, it's an awesome scene to be sure!
3) It was my greatest criticism of the film that they let Darth Vader strike a kill shot when Obi Wan simply holds up his saber in seeming surrender. But that line, “If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.” That blew my mind.
2) "Trump has a number of goals over the next couple of years … winning back the House and the Senate for Republicans in 2022 to make sure that we can stop the Democratic craziness,” said Miller."
3) "He also said that Trump will “emerge as the nation’s leader on ballot and voter integrity.”
"In the month leading up to the riot, Mr. Trump was devising his own plan: He and a Justice Department official plotted to oust the acting attorney general to try to advance baseless election claims, interviews showed...
2) "...and only backed down after top department officials threatened to resign."
Now you know, I don't believe for one second those claims were baseless. But, the information about the DOJ supporter is critical! So, where did this tidbit come from?
3) I get a daily email from the New York Times. The quote is from the email. Here is the article itself:
So, you're telling me 155,000,000 legal voters voted in 2020, are you? You really believe this, and it's the lawful truth? Uh huh. Tell you what, throw in a bridge to Manhattan and you've got a deal. I'm buying. Oh yeah.
I mean that hashtag very literally. I believe that the election was won by a landslide and then stolen. And I believe this speech was the beginning of his second term.
2) Under my new commitment to 30 tweets or less in a thread, I approach this speech in a new way. First, as there is so much to quote, I will not be commenting on the points as I roll, and as I have done consistently, previously.
3) Second, I am breaking his speech down into tweet-sized points and numbering them. I will select exactly 25 of them to tweet within my thread. I don't know how far down the same path you want to go, but I want you to know about it! Why?